Without a doubt, and that accomplishment isn't limited to the modelers on this forum alone. It needs also be said that many modelers do mediocre work, and worse, in spite of their owning the finest of tools. Beyond that, what's the relevance of your comment?
An inferior tool may serve to excuse mediocre work, while a fine tool leaves no question as to the cause of shoddy workmanship. The inferior tool inevitably limits the user, while the fine one creates no impediment to the user's pursuit of excellence, which, after all, is the essence of the ship modeler's craft..
It is of no moment whether one pursues any endeavor for love or for money, as a hobby or a job. If it's worth doing, it is worth doing well. Anyone who seriously aspires to be a craftsperson, regardless of their current level of expertise, strives to do the common thing uncommonly well in a continual pursuit of their "personal best." Even the first efforts of the youngest apprentice are to be valued as benchmarks for measuring their future improvement. The true craftsman is the harshest critic of their own work. The modeler who seeks to lower expectations by calling their efforts "just a hobby, not a job" fools no one but themself. Indeed, the "hobbyist" has less excuse for substandard work because the hobbyist has all the time in the world to do it right.
Most all of us are constrained by the cost of tools we might buy. However, the most expensive tools are not those with the highest retail price, but rather the tools we have to buy twice, or worse, prove useless for their intended purposes. Any craftsperson worthy of the title has an extensive knowledge of the tools of their trade and aspires to acquire the finest tools they can afford.