I'm one of the disagrees Bryian. The lab results and methods do not mention degradation due to natural aging, salt water and UV light. All it did was identify pigments by composition. It is far from satisfactory, a half way study with no controls for comparison and no field tests. The new curator, unlike Pete Goodwin, is not a specialist. The ship has a disagreeable dull pink tinge to it, the new boy says he cannot see the pink (perhaps, as an artist, I have a better eye?) but trust me, from up close, it aint pleasant! I accept that the original ochre which had been used since it was dry docked was inaccurate and, in any case, does not tally with the paints carried onboard according to the manifest which Peter had been considering prior to his departing. There may also be some aspects to this that are political (?) There were clashes between the RN and Pete, Victory was still commissioned then with a ship's captain. the new broom that sweeps clean! In the Victory shop opposite the ship the book section has none of Pete's works!? Quite remarkable considering the large amount of his life spent studying Victory and his output which covers all of our book shelves! I make a point of asking for one of his books every time I go to the shop!!! Then I question why they are not stocked!! Anyway, it appears that all Pete's work on the ship's colours at Trafalgar have been ignored and scrapped along with his existence! If you ever have the chance of sharing a jug with him in a Portsmouth hostelry, I wouldn't mention Victory!!!