The Caravel

Han

Joined
May 19, 2024
Messages
6
Points
3

Hello all, new to the forum but would love to learn from everyone here.

I'm currently doing a bit of research on the Caravel but there's not a lot of good sources that I can find online. Specifically in terms of blueprints, layouts, sections, etc.

For some context, I am a game developer but also enjoys a lot of historical accuracy in depiction. Currently looking into designing a Caravel due to the ship being well known as an exploration ship.

If anyone can share images, information or where I can read it up, I'd love to take a look at it!
 
Which ship are you researching or is it a research into caravels in general? There is sometimes confusion between caravels, carrack,s and galleons, thus my question. Keep in mind these ships are generally from the 15th to the 16th centuries so there is a dearth of contemporary based information compared to 18th and 19th century sources. If galleons are your interest, books by Peter Kirsch and Richard Endsor would be of great help for you. Have you been in touch with the Museo Naval in Madrid, Spain? They may be able to provide some guidance. There are speculative drawings online of the galleon Nuestra Señora de Atocha 1620 which was discovered near Key West by the Mel Fisher team. They may also have more information at the Mel Fisher Museum in Key West. You can also contact the Universite de Montreal which has information on these types of ships that may be of interest to you.

Allan
 
Thanks for the response Allan!

It'll be caravels in general. You're right! There is a lot of confusion between caravels, carracks and galleons - especially from online sources. At least now I understand it wasn't just a weird suspicion I had whenever I googled for Caravels. They'd show me pictures of the Santa Maria as well, which after some digging it's a Nao/Carrack.

At least to my understanding, the Nina and Pinta were caravels.

I'm in the midst of designing a Caravel, but I have no clue about the layout of the ship. Some were obvious enough, say the captain's cabin nearly always being below the quarterdeck, or at least a room in the aft.

But would it have cooking stations? Where would it be placed? How about crew's quarters? To my understanding caravels are ships with a shallow hull so it wouldn't leave too much space for lower deck quarters. From my understanding, caravels rarely have a forecastle too, so that's out of the picture.

If there's any blueprints of the ship layout that you can share, or at least some readings that describes it, I'd love to take a look at it!
 
Thank you so much everyone! These are really helpful!

Regarding the cooking station, are there any close-ups on what could the setup look like? What could be the utensils used, what are placed around it, etc.

Will there be cured meat hanging around it? Or will food and cooking ingredients be stored near the cooking station?
 
The earliest information with any details may be from the Wasa wreck. The location of the hearths was controversial, at least in England up to the early 17th century when the Commission of Enquiry of 1618 decided cooking was to be done forward. I have not seen any drawings of cooking stoves or the like earlier than mid 17th century but would love to see some. Lavery shows pictures of stoves from the 17th-19th centuries in The Arming and Fitting of English Ships of War. Kirsch's book Galleon may be of help to you as well as the Treatise on Shipbuilding circa 1620. I understand there is a copy at the National Archives in Kew, England and they may be able to help you. Also, you might want to contact The Society for Nautical Research as this treatise was discussed among members about 8 or 9 years ago.
Allan
 
  • Like
Reactions: Han
Thank you so much everyone! These are really helpful!

Regarding the cooking station, are there any close-ups on what could the setup look like? What could be the utensils used, what are placed around it, etc.

Will there be cured meat hanging around it? Or will food and cooking ingredients be stored near the cooking station?
Screenshot_2024-05-22-14-55-51-052_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpgScreenshot_2024-05-22-14-55-14-667_com.google.android.apps.docs.jpg
 
a friend built an interpretation of a Santa Maria - photo made during the meeting in Augsburg

f93t9554p228514n9_TYlUqZXp.jpg

IMG_4956.jpg

 
a friend built an interpretation of a Santa Maria - photo made during the meeting in Augsburg

View attachment 448817

View attachment 448818

I see this model is based on Mondfeld's drawings, right? In its version, Santa Maria looks like a nao with a round stern. I have plans for the distant future to build a model of Santa Maria exactly according to these drawings (if I continue to do modeling, of course:))
 
The cooking stations look mobile. Can they be moved around or are they a actually fixture?

Another question I have;
Are there any caravels that had crew's quarters? If so, how would they look like? I'm assuming it'll be hammocks or hanging beds stacked.
 
The cooking stations look mobile. Can they be moved around or are they a actually fixture?

Another question I have;
Are there any caravels that had crew's quarters? If so, how would they look like? I'm assuming it'll be hammocks or hanging beds stacked.
Until 1492, there were no hammocks on ships. They were later adopted by Spanish sailors from the Indians - the inhabitants of the lands discovered by Columbus.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Han
With much appreciation to YouTube algorithms, I stumbled upon this video:

It's really awesome to be able to see the interior, and even potentially how the lower deck might've looked like.

Although it is a recreation and perhaps with some creative liberties, I'd love to inquire if it's as plausible of a design historically? This will help me understand how much I can push the interior designs of a caravel myself!

I'm especially impressed by the hinged whipstaff attached to the tiller.
 
With much appreciation to YouTube algorithms, I stumbled upon this video:

It's really awesome to be able to see the interior, and even potentially how the lower deck might've looked like.

Although it is a recreation and perhaps with some creative liberties, I'd love to inquire if it's as plausible of a design historically? This will help me understand how much I can push the interior designs of a caravel myself!

I'm especially impressed by the hinged whipstaff attached to the tiller.
Very interesting
imagine, that the old seamen sailed over the oceans with such a vessel - and not only during sunshine weather.....
Many thanks for sharing with us
 
  • Like
Reactions: Han
Hello Han and welcome to the forum.
In 2019, replica ships of the Nina and Pinta visited my town (Florence, Alabama, USA). The following is a summary of their information packet:
They were built by the Columbus Foundation. Following years of research the group first built the Nina as it had the most information and history available as she participated in Columbus' first three voyages. The Nina was built as a Caravel Redonda, with square sails on the fore and main masts for better sailing downwind. The foundation hired John Patrick Sarsfield to design and construct the ship. The building process called Mediterranean Whole Moulding, used by master ship builders in the 15th century was used in the construction. This process was in daily use in shipyards on the coast of Bahia in Brazil. The fishing village of Valenca was selected as the build site. Only traditional tools such as axes, adzes, hand saws and chisels were used. The timber was sourced from the tropical forests of Bahia.
Ships of this period were typically not built from a set or plans but from the mental template in the head of the shipwright who based the dimensions of the ship on a set of proportions. Fundamental factors as the number of masts and rigging specifics were clarified from recent discoveries of wrecks in the Caribbean.
Tragically, John Sarsfield was killed in a traffic accident in 1990 while on a trip to select a main mast.
As the hull was complete, the ship had yet to be rigged. British Naval Historian Jonathan Nash, one of the main researchers of the project oversaw completion of construction. John produced a sail plan for the caravel together with numerous drawings of blocks, spars, and other fittings.
No historical design information has been found for Nina but specific reference to her rig and gear survives in a document called "Libro de Armadas" which was discovered by Eugene Lyon.
It indicated that Nina may have been a four-master. The document also included an inventory of equipment aboard the Nina in 1498 when new Master Pedro Frances took over the ship. Nance's sail plan represents the Nina during the eight recorded busy years of her life following her departure from the Canaries in September,
1492.
In June, 1990, a group of marine archaeological researchers from "Ships of Discovery", based in Corpus Christi, Texas spent a week inspecting the project and were convinced of its authenticity. They published their observations in an article in the January 1991 issue of Archaeology magazine. I don't know if this article is currently available.
In December 1991 the Nina left the banks of the Rio Uno in Valenca, Brazil, rigged as a four-master. It carried a crew of eleven and arrived in Puntarenas, Costa Rica on January 23, 1992 to take part in the film "1492" directed by Ridley Scott. It's voyage of over 4,000 miles represents the first time that a discovery caravel replica has made a successful unescorted open ocean passage of any considerable distance.
Other info: the cargo hold was used for provisions, water, and armaments. Live animals included horses, cows, and pigs suspended in slings for the ship's motion; and chickens. The men lived and slept on deck, which was often awash. Cooking was done in a fire box located on deck in the bow of the ship. There are no ratlines, the crew climbed the ropes when needed. One of the ship's crew provided a live demonstration for us. Also, the man in the blue shirt at the tiller is a long term crewman who was a master storyteller. I wish I had gotten his name.
More information can be found at the following:
website: www.thenina.com
website: www.ninapinta.org
Twitter (now X): @ColumbusShips
Instagram: @ColumbusShips
Hopefully you may be able to find drawings or illustrations there

I'll try to attach some photos of my visit. Visitors weren't allowed on the quarterdeck.DSCF2495.JPGDSCF2496.JPGDSCF2497.JPGDSCF2503.JPGDSCF2504.JPGDSCF2507.JPGDSCF2511.JPGDSCF2528.JPGDSCF2523.JPGDSCF2512.JPGDSCF2552.JPG

DSCF2528.JPG
 
When I began building ship models eons ago it was widely accepted that the basis for a worthwhile ship model was a faithful representation of the actual vessel’s hull shape. Builders were therefore discouraged from building models of Columbus’ vessels as next to nothing was known about them. Since that time research into design methods has allowed somewhat more accurate reconstruction of the hull forms of these old vessels but major questions still exist. Nautical archeology has also provided some limited clues but areas of interest to modelers have long since been erased by Mother Nature. If you wanted to know what the mast step on a 1490’s Caravel looked like there’s lots of information! Replicas of these vessels are also misleading as the builders of these have no better information than ship modelers and some features must be changed to meet modern Safety of Sea requirements.

One area of the ship most in doubt would be its stern. During the 1400’s the hull form of these old vessels gradually changed from a “round” to a square stern. Round sterned hull forms were pointed at both ends (sort of like a Viking ship hull). Box shaped superstructure sat atop this pointed stern. During the century square sterned ships with flat transoms began to appear. Columbus’s caravel’s were built during this period, and there is no way to really which type of stern Nina had.

If you would like to explore what’s actually known, I recommend the book Vanguards of Empire by Roger C. Smith. He objectively explores known information about these ancient vessels.

Roger
 
Hi Roger, thanks for the great insight. This is definitely something that I have only learned from your sharing.

I'll look into the book you recommended. Cheers!
 
Back
Top