Does glue break lines long term?

Joined
Mar 17, 2021
Messages
461
Points
278

Location
San Diego, CA
My wife has people come to deep clean the house periodically and they seem to hate ship models (they aren't too fond of my lighthouse models either). I have a couple of rigged boats that aren't in cases and I think they flog them with the duster or knock them over trying to dust underneath, despite asking them to stay away from them. As a result, I get some practice fixing up damaged models.

I've noticed that the lines typically break where they are knotted. During building or repair, I usually add a small drop of PVA glue on the knots to avoid slippage. In fact, they seem to break more often than I think is common, unless the house cleaners are really giving them the business. I have also seen lines that have fallen away with time. Twenty years ago I built a beginner rigged model on a lark and then didn't build anything again for some time. I have found it far from the cleaning action and I find lines that have broken and they always seem to fall apart at the knots or tackle.

Are knots or glued sections of lines more vulnerable to breakage? Is there something unique that I could be doing wrong? I have used both the nylon rope from the kit (the 20 yo model) and high quality aftermarket line from a reputable vendor. The lines are rigged taut, but not bending anything. Is a little shellac on the knots and maybe the lines themselves a better way forward?

I just started a kit for a brig with more extensive rigging and really don't want to have to pull out the belaying plan frequently to figure out where the lines go or untangle a fallen yard from the lines to completely redo a section.

I know. Strange topic. Advice, input, information, experience, and speculation would all be appreciated. And if that brig I started turns out, I'll be sure to put in a case, maybe with some plexiglass panels, located in a room that can be locked when the cleaners come.

Thanks in advance.
 
Another reason not to rig a model :) Alas, my current project requires it so I too look forward to hearing what others have to say. I have had good luck using watered done white Elmers school glue in years past. Yellow glue has aliphatic resin which make it better suited for wood as it cures harder and sands better than white PVA. White glue remains more elastic and dries clear, maybe better suited for the knots.
Allan
 
Are knots or glued sections of lines more vulnerable to breakage? Is there something unique that I could be doing wrong?

Your reported experiences would seem to indicate that they are. While more research well beyond my capabilities would be needed to call my opinion "based on science," I have seen the phenomena you've described. I don't think there is anything "unique" that you are doing. Rather, what you are doing is quite common in the "monkey see, monkey do" world of internet-informed scale ship modeling. I was involved in a similar discussion some weeks ago and I've copied here in this post the comments I had back then. The reader can read them if they want to take a deeper dive into "the glue pot."

Deterioration of ship models most likely results in most cases from a variety of causes, the most common of which are: 1. The lack of suitably archival materials, 2. Adverse environmental exposure, and 3. collision impacts, i.e., "breakage." To some extent, these "insults" often overlap simultaneously. The first consideration any ship modeler who wishes their model to last for more than ten or twenty years is the "archival quality" of the materials they use in their model. Many modelers disregard, and even ridicule, the concept of archival quality. They will say that they've never had any problem with their models deteriorating with age over a period of ten or twenty years. This anecdotal evidence isn't compellingly probative because the range of variables is quite great. The accepted requirement of archival quality is a life span of one hundred years or more. Many modern materials haven't been around long enough for us to be sure. The original poster here reports that he's experiencing rigging thread deterioration in less than twenty years and wonders if his saturating his rigging knots in PVAc diluted in water may be th cause. In part, it probably is.

I don't know who started the fad of "sealing" or "coating" scale model rigging cordage with diluted PVAc adhesive but applying what we know about PVAc adhesive's archival effects, it appears to be a very poor idea. PVAc is an acidic material that attacks the fibrous structure of rigging thread, weaking it over time. PVAc is about the least archival material one could use fot such a purpose. PVAc is also the least reversable of any of the adhesives which are considered reversible at all. While it does a good job holding wood together when used as directed, the difficulty of its reversibility should preclude its use, save for the fact of its near-universal availability.

Other factors contribute to the loss of breaking resistance in rigging thread at knots treated with PVAc. The models in question aren't cased. There are archival pluses and minuses to casing models, which is another subject in itself. A model case that lacks sufficient ventilation can do more damage than good. Without a case, though, the rigging is subjected to environmental influences that promote thread breakage at knots. Without a case, the rigging is more subject to air movement which creates movement, however minute. Where the thread has been knotted and stiffened with PVAc, when the untreated thread moves, there is a repetitive stress point created where the "flexible" thread meets the "stiff" thread. Repeated movement at that strress point, exacerbated by the effects of PVAc's acidity, over time, just weakens the thread at that "hard point" enough that is breaks easily. When you add a malevolent maid with a feather duster into the mix, you've got rigging thread that breaks where knotted and saturated with PVAc.

Now, this is simply my hypothesis at the moment, and a peer-reviewed paper would be required before anybody would start paying out grant money for it, but, at the moment, it's my story and I'm sticking to it.


As for "what is to be done," the following post copies explain the options based upon much more science that my present theory of "the case of the breaking threads." What is very important of scale ship modelers to understand is that ordinary polyvinyl acetate ("PVAc") adhesive, such as "Tightbond" and "Elmer's" is not of sufficient archival quality to be suitable for use in high-quality ship modeling. Unfortunately, the term "PVA" is used incorrectly on just about every internet ship modeling forum. There are two types of polyvinyl adhesives with different archival qualities: polyvinyl acetate and polyvinyl alcohol. Both are referred to as "PVA" without distinction. If one is interested in using polyvinyl adhesive, only "archival polyvinyl adhesive" which has neutral acidity should be used. This product is addressed in greater detail in the discussion below.

**********************************************************************************************************************************

The original post thankfully illustrates the value of archival quality materials in high-quality scale ship modeling. A lot of hobbyist modelers seem to thing archival quality is something which, at best, is only relevant to models found in museums, if relevant at all. What follows is a discission from another thread beginning with one modeler's characteristic skepticism about archival considerations.


While we are on the subject of CA glue, it has been said, written, that CA glue only last for 5 to 20 years. I have been building ships longer than that and I have yet to see one of my models fall apart because the glue has failed. Granted I have given away scores of my ships, therefore I cannot attest to the derogation of my really old ships. The ships I still have that old are only about 40 to 50 years and I see no problems with them, except of course dust. Has anyone had a model fall apart because of glue failure? Or is this another "sea story".

Please bear with me while I expound to all and sundry in order to get a pet peeve off my chest.

"Anecdotal evidence," which in the social media environment is often only opinion stated as fact, comes to be repeated in "monkey see, monkey do" fashion until repeated enough that it becomes generally accepted as true. (As famously addressed sixty years ago by the pioneering electronic media theorist, Marshall McLuhan.) Those scale ship modelers who primary rely on the internet to learn the craft are particularly susceptible to the fallacious belief that what "everybody says online" must be correct. In the scale ship modeling arena, this communications phenomenon is particularly apparent concerning the subject of adhesives. Folks frequently post asking which adhesive they should use and just as frequently are given the same shopworn scientifically baseless, and frequently incorrect, answers. The current fad of "watered down `PVA'" is a case in point. The misconception that rigging threads need to be "coated" with diluted "PVA" for protection and to make them "stiffer" is so widespread one might expect "PVA" will soon be touted as a cure for erectile dysfunction as well! The fans of CA adhesive are no differently misinformed, notwithstanding that their "poison of choice" has worked for them... so far.

I don't doubt the accuracy of your reported satisfactory experience using CA as an adhesive on ship models. I haven't had any problems on the very rare occasions I've used it. Such anecdotal evidence is not entirely without merit, as far as it goes, but without scientific proof, it cannot be considered conclusively demonstrated. Fortunately, unlike too many others these days, you are blessed with healthy "critical thinking" skills and ask, "Has anyone had a model fall apart because of glue failure?" Questioning minds are the smartest minds!

The answer to your question is unequivocally, "Yes, I have seen many models fall apart because of glue failure." Having restored hundred-year-old ship models (though usually models no more than fifty years old,) which have been exposed to a variety of deleterious environmental conditions, I'd have to say that the first apparent deterioration in any ship model's fabric will usually be the adhesives. That said, the older the model, the less likely it will exhibit adhesive deterioration because the adhesives used in its original construction are usually those with very strong archival properties. Most pre-WWII vintage models are glued with hide glues, shellac, and/or nitrocellulose cement. Also, of course, most well-built older models will employ adhesives only as a secondary fastening element, with all joints primarily fastened mechanically with a peg or nail, creating a redundant "belt and suspenders" connection. Nevertheless, my anecdotal evidence that ship model glue joints fail is no more scientifically supported than your anecdotal evidence that CA joints don't fail.

Notwithstanding our similar satisfactory experiences, cyanoacrylate adhesives are universally considered unsuitable for meeting "archival" materials quality standards by professionals in the field on the basis of scientific testing. This isn't just some scientist's opinion, let alone yours or mine. It's a fact proven by observation and testing reviewed by peer scientists who have reached a consensus on the validity of the findings. A reliable service life of "one-hundred-years-plus" is the threshold "archival" longevity standard for artifact preservation used by professional conservators and restorationists. CA's primary advantage is its fast-curing time which permits its use for "tacking" pieces together and for this reason CA is best used in together with other slower-curing adhesives which have far better archival properties. The archival reliability of CA adhesives is dependent upon a variety of commonly occurring environmental factors to which ship models are customarily exposed, including, but not limited to, enclosed display cases, humidity changes, and UV light exposure. This fact explains why one "anecdotal observation" is contrary to another. "Correlation does not imply causation."

In addition to CA's archival vulnerabilities, its very poor "reversibility," i.e., the ease of nondestructive disassembly of joined parts for purposes of maintenance and repair, causes its near-universal rejection as suitable for any archival use whatsoever by curatorial professionals. The present consensus of professional curatorial scientists is that the "state of the art" adhesives for use on artifacts such as ship models are 1) Paraloid B-72, 2) clear shellac, 3) natural hide glues, 4) nitrocellulose cement, and 5) polyvinyl alcohol adhesive (primarily for the conservation of paper and cloth,) in that order with the most preferable first. Other adhesives, such as epoxies, may be used on occasion, for specialized applications, of course. Generally speaking, the first criterion for an archivally acceptable adhesive is "Does it stick?" The second, near equally important criterion, is "Does it unstick?" When it comes to adhesive choices, most amateur ship modelers have either "not gotten the memo" yet or for whatever reason don't care how long their work might last.

Since we're talking adhesives, let's resolve "Great PVA Debate" once and for all while we're at it:

On occasion, I've debated the archival properties of "PVA" adhesives such as Titebond and Elmer's Glue which are marketed in the U.S. I have maintained they're archival properties aren't all that good, owing in part to their acid content. Others, including some professional chemist-types, have argued to the contrary, citing multiple online posts and published articles in otherwise respectable ship modeling publications. I've used a lot of Titebond "PVA" in my day, just like almost everybody else. I never could reconcile the conflicting information on the archival qualities of the stuff until now. "The literature," as the academics say, was "all over the place."

After much research, I've discovered that, like just about everybody else who's ever posted online about ship model adhesives, I was a little bit right about "PVA's" acid off-gassing properties, and a lot wrong about "PVA" itself. The confusion comes from the similarity in the names of two different types of polyvinyl adhesive which everybody generically calls "PVA." We've all been like two guys arguing over whether Jello tastes good or not without ever knowing that Jello comes in more than one flavor!

THE WHOLE AMATEUR SHIP MODELING COMMUNITY HAS MISTAKENLY BEEN USING THE WRONG "PVA" ADHESIVE.

These two distinct "PVA's" are widely confused, even by AI search engines, which, of course, only repeat the balance of what data is on the internet, in this case, the blather of all of us in ship modeling forums who share the same "Big Mistake:" One "PVA" has good archival qualities and the other doesn't. The "PVA" that doesn't have good archival qualities is the one just about every amateur ship modeler around has used for years, many mistakenly believing that its archival properties were those of the other "PVA" they weren't using! Yes. I'm serious.

Just saying "PVA" is like just saying "cholesterol" because there's more than one kind. The "Bad PVA" is polyvinyl acetate adhesive, properly known by scientists as "PVAc" and "sold in the U.S. as Titebond and Elmer's Glue. It's also called "white glue" or "wood glue." It's used extensively for a variety of purposes, especially woodworking, but never by professional conservators and restorers because its archival properties are sorely lacking. In fact, it can actually contribute to the deterioration of a cased ship model over time.

The "Good PVA" is polyvinyl alcohol adhesive, properly known by scientists as "PVA" and by curatorial professionals also as "archival-grade PVA," or "archival PVA." This is the only polyvinyl adhesive professional conservators and restorationists use and it's the one scale ship modelers should be using to maximize the archival qualities of our models if we care how well they will withstand the ravages of time.

This confusion of the two types of polyvinyl adhesives extends well beyond the ship modeling community. Below, I have copied a couple of articles which explain far more clearly than I can what the differences between the two polyvinyl adhesives are. If it matters to you at all, do read them.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************
Navigating the world of adhesives can be confusing, especially when terms like PVA and PVAc are used interchangeably or with subtle distinctions.
While both Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) and Polyvinyl Acetate (PVAc) are polymer-based adhesives with significant overlap in usage, understanding their differences is key to selecting the optimal product for your needs. ...

PVAc, or Polyvinyl Acetate, is perhaps the more commonly recognized adhesive, often found in everyday 'white glue' or 'wood glue'
. It is synthesized directly from vinyl acetate monomer and is known for its strong adhesion, relatively fast drying time, and ease of use. Many common school glues and woodworking adhesives are PVAc-based. They are generally water-based, making cleanup straightforward.

PVA, or Polyvinyl Alcohol, is chemically distinct. It is typically produced by hydrolyzing PVAc, meaning the acetate groups are replaced with hydroxyl groups. This chemical modification imparts different properties. While PVAc is the direct product of monomer polymerization, PVA is a derivative. This distinction is crucial when considering applications where specific performance characteristics are required.

One of the primary differences lies in their properties related to water. PVA is generally more water-soluble than PVAc, which can be an advantage for applications requiring reversibility or easy cleanup, such as in conservation or certain industrial processes. PVA also tends to exhibit better flexibility and archival stability, meaning it is less prone to yellowing or becoming brittle over time. This makes PVA the preferred choice for archival quality glue for paper and delicate materials.

In terms of applications, PVAc is widely favored for general crafting and woodworking due to its strong initial bond and cost-effectiveness. However, PVA finds its niche in more specialized areas. Its water solubility and reversibility are beneficial in textile sizing and as a component in paper coatings. In conservation, the PVA glue properties of being non-yellowing and flexible are highly valued. The PVA glue vs PVAc debate often resolves based on the need for these specific attributes.

For users seeking a basic, reliable adhesive for everyday crafts or general woodworking, PVAc often suffices. However, when projects demand greater flexibility, superior archival longevity, or specific water-related performance characteristics, PVA emerges as the superior choice. Understanding these nuances allows for informed selection, ensuring that the chosen adhesive meets the project's demands. Whether you're a crafter, a woodworker, or involved in industrial applications, appreciating the subtle yet significant differences between PVA and PVAc is key to achieving optimal results. ...


Choosing the Right Adhesive: PVA Glue vs. Polyvinyl Acetate (PVAc)

Confused between PVA and PVAc glue? This article clarifies the differences, applications, and advantages of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) and Polyvinyl Acetate (PVAc) adhesives.
www.nbinno.com
*****************************************************************************************************************************************
In the delicate and precise world of art conservation and archival preservation, the choice of adhesive is paramount.
Materials must be handled with the utmost care, and the adhesives used must not compromise the integrity or longevity of the items being treated. Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) glue has long been the conservator's choice for these very reasons, offering a unique blend of properties essential for historical document repair, bookbinding, and artifact restoration. ...

The primary reason PVA glue is favored in conservation is its archival quality. Unlike many other adhesives, PVA is formulated to be acid-free and does not yellow or become brittle with age. This ensures that the adhesive itself does not contribute to the deterioration of the valuable materials it holds together. When working with historical documents, photographs, or delicate paper objects, the advantages of PVA glue in terms of long-term stability are non-negotiable.

Another critical property for conservators is the reversibility of the bond. PVA, being water-soluble, can often be gently reactivated with moisture. This allows conservators to painstakingly undo repairs, if necessary, without causing damage to the original material. This controlled reversibility is a significant advantage over more permanent adhesives that can trap materials permanently or cause damage if a mistake is made. The careful polyvinyl alcohol adhesive applications in conservation rely heavily on this controlled reversibility.

Furthermore, PVA provides a strong yet flexible bond. This flexibility is important for materials that might experience slight dimensional changes due to environmental fluctuations, such as humidity or temperature. A rigid adhesive could stress these materials and lead to cracking or delamination. The gentle bonding action of PVA ensures that the original item's structure is not unduly stressed. This is why PVA is often recommended as an archival quality glue for paper and other sensitive substrates.

The application process for PVA glue is also well-suited to conservation work. Its controlled viscosity, often achieved by mixing the powder with purified water, allows for precise application using fine brushes or other specialized tools. The PVA glue properties lend themselves to meticulous work, where only the exact amount of adhesive needed is applied to a specific area.

While PVAc glues are also used in some crafting applications, the specific requirements of conservation and archival work—namely, the need for pH neutrality, long-term stability, and controlled reversibility—often make PVA the superior choice.
The careful selection of adhesives is fundamental to preserving our cultural heritage, and PVA glue continues to be an indispensable tool in this critical endeavor. ...


The Conservator's Choice: Why PVA Glue is Essential for Archival and Restoration Work

Discover why PVA glue is the preferred adhesive for art conservators and archivists, focusing on its archival quality, reversibility, and gentle bonding properties.
www.nbinno.com
*****************************************************************************************************************************************

There's no point in responding to this post with a lot of excuses for why you don't believe the science (which you can fact check yourself) or don't care about your model lasting longer than you do. If that is where your head is at, there's no question that none of this information should interest you at all. There's no question that CA adhesive or polyvinyl acetate (or "PVAc," as it's properly called) will hold a model together for a good long time and quite often surely for longer than the model's builder will hold together. If you don't think anybody will be interested in enjoying your model after you are gone, I suppose there's no better judge of that than yourself.

If, on the other hand, you aspire to "run with the big dogs" and have an interest in producing the finest models you possibly can, I hope this bit of basic information on scale ship modeling adhesives will be of help to you in that endeavor.

Below is a comparison of the primary adhesives useful in scale ship modeling from a museum curator, restorationist and conservator's perspectives. Few of our models will ever be of interest to any one of those types of professionals, but I find building mine while fantasizing that it might makes researching, designing, and building them even more enjoyable. To that end, I try to pick the best materials for the job, but that's just me.


*****************************************************************************************************************************************

CONTINUED IN FOLLOWING POST BELOW
 
Last edited:
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST ABOVE


CYANOACRYLATE ADHESIVES
, often called “super glue,” are fast-curing, high-strength bonding agents that polymerize rapidly when exposed to trace moisture on surfaces. While they are valued for their speed and versatility, their archival qualities — i.e., long-term stability, resistance to degradation, and suitability for preservation — are limited compared to specialized archival adhesives.

Key archival considerations:

  • Chemical stability over time:
    Cyanoacrylates are generally chemically stable once cured, but they are not inherently archival grade. They can degrade under prolonged exposure to UV light, high temperatures, or certain solvents, which may compromise bond integrity over decades.
  • Brittleness and impact resistance:
    Standard cyanoacrylates are brittle and have poor shock or impact resistance, which can make them unsuitable for objects that may experience mechanical stress over time. This brittleness can lead to microcracking and eventual bond failure.
  • Gap filling and substrate adhesion:
    They bond well to many materials (plastics, metals, rubber, ceramics, wood, glass, paper, cloth, cement, tissue), but their poor gap-filling ability means they are best for flat, closely matched surfaces. In archival work, where surface irregularities or gaps may occur, this can limit their use.
  • Environmental resistance:
    They offer moderate resistance to water and heat, but archival materials often require long-term resistance to humidity, temperature fluctuations, and light. Cyanoacrylates are not designed for the extreme environmental stability needed in museum or library preservation.
  • Reversibility and removal:
    Once cured, cyanoacrylates are difficult to remove without damaging the bonded surfaces. This lack of reversibility is a major drawback in archival contexts, where non-invasive restoration or future disassembly may be necessary.
  • Specialty formulations:
    Some archival or conservation-grade adhesives use modified cyanoacrylates (e.g., elastomer-modified) to improve flexibility and reduce brittleness, but these are niche and not standard in consumer or industrial products.
Summary:
Cyanoacrylate adhesives are not considered archival adhesives in the strict sense. They are fast, strong, and versatile for many applications, but their brittleness, poor gap filling, and lack of reversibility make them unsuitable for long-term preservation of sensitive or high-value objects. For archival work, specialized adhesives designed for flexibility, reversibility, and environmental stability are preferred.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************
PARALOID B-72
is a thermoplastic acrylic resin (ethyl methacrylate–methyl acrylate copolymer) widely used in conservation for its durability, reversibility, and resistance to yellowing. Its archival qualities make it a preferred consolidant and adhesive for cultural heritage materials.

Key archival properties:

  • Chemical stability and reversibility – B-72 is a stable acrylic resin that does not require plasticizers to maintain durability, unlike cellulose nitrate. It is considered reversible in conservation, meaning it can be removed without damaging the underlying object.
  • Non-yellowing – It resists discoloration over time, preserving the original appearance of artworks and artifacts.
  • Adhesion and flexibility – It adheres well to a range of materials (ceramics, glass, wood, metal) and is more flexible than many other adhesives, allowing it to tolerate stress and strain without cracking.
  • Durability – Once cured, it forms a hard, wear-resistant film that is stable under normal environmental conditions.
  • Compatibility – It is compatible with vinyl, cellulosic, and silicone resins, and can be used as a barrier layer to protect against pollutants and moisture .
  • Environmental resistance – It is insoluble in water and oils, and its water absorption is minimal, making it suitable for use in varying humidity environments.
Limitations to consider:
  • Requires careful preparation and application to avoid compromising working properties.
  • Solvent choice (acetone is best) and ratios affect setting time and final film properties.
  • Not all inks are compatible; some may be disrupted by B-72 solutions.
In summary, Paraloid B-72’s archival qualities—stability, reversibility, non-yellowing, flexibility, and durability—make it a reliable choice for conservation work, provided it is handled and applied according to best practices.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************
SHELLAC
possesses several archival and preservation-related qualities that make it suitable for long-term storage and use in sensitive applications.

1. Natural, non-toxic, and biocompatible
Shellac is a natural resin secreted by the lac insect, composed mainly of polyesters of polyhydroxy aliphatic and sesquiterpene acids. Its biocompatibility and non-toxic nature mean it is safe for use in food, pharmaceutical, and archival materials without introducing harmful residues.

2. Chemical stability and aging behavior
In its acid form, shellac is pH-dependent in solubility and undergoes aging, which increases its glass transition temperature and reduces acid value and solubility. This aging process can make it more rigid over time, which may be beneficial for archival applications requiring dimensional stability.

3. Water resistance
As a water-resistant resin, shellac can protect underlying materials from moisture ingress, a key factor in archival preservation. This property was historically used in wood finishes and electrical insulation to block moisture and maintain integrity.

4. Dielectric properties
Shellac has excellent dielectric properties, making it useful in archival electronics or as a protective coating for sensitive components.

5. Film-forming and adhesive strength
Its ability to form clear, adherent films and seal surfaces makes it effective for encapsulating or protecting archival documents, artworks, and objects from environmental degradation.

6. Biodegradability and sustainability
Shellac is biodegradable and derived from renewable sources, aligning with modern archival practices that favor sustainable, environmentally benign materials.

7. Historical and cultural relevance
Shellac has been used for centuries in coatings, insulations, and decorative finishes, giving it a proven track record in preserving materials over long periods.

Practical archival considerations
  • Long-term storage: May require monitoring for stiffness changes due to aging.
  • Environmental control: Stable in moderate temperatures and low humidity; avoid prolonged exposure to high heat or strong alkaline conditions.
  • Application: Best applied in controlled environments to maintain clarity and adhesion.
In summary, shellac’s natural origin, chemical stability, water resistance, and biodegradability make it a viable archival material for protecting and preserving a range of cultural and scientific objects, provided its aging and environmental sensitivity are managed.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************
NATURAL HIDE GLUES
— made from animal collagen extracted from hides, bones, and connective tissues—possess several properties that make them valuable in archival and conservation contexts.

Reversibility and Non-Destructive Repair
One of the most important archival qualities is full reversibility. Unlike many synthetic adhesives, which undergo permanent chemical changes when they cure, hide glue bonds can be cleanly undone with heat and moisture. This allows conservators to disassemble and reassemble objects without damaging the original materials, preserving historical integrity.

Biodegradability and Non-Toxicity
Hide glue is biodegradable and free from synthetic chemicals, making it safe for use on organic materials such as wood, leather, and plant specimens. Its natural origin also means it does not leach harmful substances over time, which is critical for long-term preservation.

Compatibility with Delicate Materials
Because it bonds without damaging the substrate, hide glue is ideal for fine antiques, musical instruments, and botanical mounts. It adheres well to wood and other natural materials without causing discoloration or chemical degradation.

Aging Stability
While not as chemically inert as some modern adhesives, hide glue is stable over centuries when properly applied. Its protein structure resists degradation under normal storage conditions, and its reversibility ensures that future conservation work can be performed without compromising the object.

Historical Authenticity
In archival and museum contexts, hide glue is often preferred because it is historically authentic—it was used in the same way by craftsmen and conservators of the past. This authenticity supports the preservation of original materials and methods.

Limitations
Hide glue is not immune to environmental factors. It can be affected by high humidity, temperature extremes, and prolonged exposure to light. It also has a finite shelf life and can degrade over time, especially if stored improperly.

Summary
For archival purposes, natural hide glue’s reversibility, biodegradability, compatibility with organic materials, and historical authenticity make it a preferred choice for mounting, repairs, and conservation. However, its use requires careful handling and storage to maintain its long-term stability and effectiveness.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************
NITROCELLULOSE CEMENT
— a cellulose nitrate-based binder — has been used historically in archival and conservation contexts, particularly in early photographic emulsions, microscope slide sealants, and some early adhesives. Its archival qualities are shaped by its chemical structure, physical properties, and long-term stability.

1. Chemical and Structural Basis
Nitrocellulose is formed by nitrating cellulose with a mixture of nitric and sulfuric acids, replacing hydroxyl groups with nitrate ester groups. The degree of nitration (nitrogen content) determines solubility, flammability, and mechanical behavior. For archival applications, low-nitration grades (10.7–12.6% nitrogen) are preferred because they are less energetic, more chemically stable, and form durable, transparent films.

2. Film-Forming and Adhesion Properties
Nitrocellulose cements form hydrogen-bonded networks upon solvent evaporation, producing clear, flexible films with good adhesion to glass, metal, and some plastics. This makes them suitable for sealing microscope slides, preserving photographic emulsions, and bonding archival materials.

3. Long-Term Stability and Degradation
  • Stability factors: Properly purified nitrocellulose with stabilizers (e.g., diphenylamine) resists premature decomposition.
  • Degradation risks: Over time, nitrocellulose can hydrolyze, especially in the presence of moisture, heat, or acidic byproducts. This can lead to yellowing, embrittlement, and loss of adhesion.
  • Nitrogen oxide release: If residual acids remain, acid-catalyzed breakdown can occur, producing nitrogen oxides and further instability.
4. Environmental Sensitivity
Nitrocellulose is highly flammable (flash point ~4.4 °C) and sensitive to heat, light, and oxygen. In archival storage, it must be kept in a cool, dry, dark environment to minimize degradation and fire risk.

5. Archival Suitability
  • Pros: Excellent clarity, strong adhesion, and ability to form thin, uniform films.
  • Cons: Requires careful handling and storage; prone to hydrolytic and oxidative degradation over decades.
  • Best use cases: Short- to medium-term preservation where transparency and adhesion are critical, and where environmental conditions can be tightly controlled.
Summary:
Nitrocellulose cement’s archival qualities are good for adhesion and clarity but limited by long-term chemical instability. It is best suited for archival work when low-nitration grades are used, stabilizers are present, and strict environmental controls are applied to prevent hydrolysis, oxidation, and fire hazards. For long-term preservation, modern synthetic resins or acrylic-based cements are generally preferred due to superior stability.

*****************************************************************************************************************************************
POLYVINYL ALCOHOL ("PVA") ADHESIVES,
formulated for conservation (i.e., marked as neutral ph) are widely regarded as archival-grade materials due to their stability, reversibility, and compatibility with paper and other archival substrates.

Key archival qualities include:
  • Chemical stability and inertness: Archival PVA adhesives are typically acid-free and do not off-gas once dry, making them safe for long-term use in collections. They are chemically stable under normal storage conditions and do not release harmful volatile compounds.
  • Resistance to yellowing: Unlike some synthetic adhesives, archival PVA does not yellow over time, preserving the visual integrity of the bonded materials.
  • Non-brittleness with age: When stored in appropriate conditions, archival PVA remains flexible and does not become brittle, which is critical for maintaining the structural integrity of paper and other materials.
  • Lay-flat properties: PVA adhesives help minimize curling or waviness in paper by providing a strong yet flexible bond, which is important for preserving the original form of documents.
  • Reversibility and re-treatability: PVA adhesives are considered reversible, meaning they can be removed or replaced without damaging the substrate, which is a key requirement for conservation treatments.
  • Compatibility: They adhere well to most non-metallic surfaces and are suitable for use in mending, hinging, lining, and other conservation applications.
  • Controlled drying: Archival PVA can be formulated to dry clear and flexible, and can be mixed with methyl cellulose to slow drying if needed arcare.com.
Conservation considerations:
  • Always use archival-grade (Polyvinyl alcohol) PVA (acid-free, non-yellowing, non-brittling) rather than general-purpose PVAc (Polyvinylacetate,) which may contain additives that could be harmful.
  • Store in a cool, dry place away from direct light to maintain stability.
  • Avoid over-application to prevent cold flow or excess adhesive seepage into the substrate.
In summary, archival PVA adhesives are stable, reversible, non-yellowing, and non-brittling, making them a preferred choice for long-term preservation in libraries, archives, and museums

*****************************************************************************************************************************************
POLYVINYL ACETATE ("PVAc")
adhesives are not widely regarded as archival grade due to their instability, limited reversibility, and incompatibility with paper and other archival materials.

Key archival properties
  • Chemical stability: Non-archival PVAc adhesives are not typically acid-free and non-offgassing (Oddy tested), meaning they release harmful volatile compounds that could damage sensitive materials. This is of particular concern with artifacts displayed in cases lacking adequate ventilation.
  • Resistance to yellowing: PVAc adhesives may discolor over time under normal storage conditions, affecting the appearance of the bonded materials.
  • Long-term stability: When stored in an unstable environment, archival PVAc may become brittle with age and lose flexibility.
  • Reversibility: Although PVAc adhesives are considered reversible using isopropyl alcohol and/or heat, such reversibility is often difficult, depending upon the length of cure, which jeopardizes its safe removal or re-treatment if needed.
  • Lay-flat properties: PVAc's water content may cause paper curling or waviness or raise wood grain, which interferes with maintaining the flatness of paper and wood surfaces.
  • Compatibility: PVAc adhesive adheres well to most non-metallic surfaces.
  • Drying characteristics: Many PVAc adhesives do not dry clear nor flexible. Neither Titebond Original, Titebond II, nor Titebond III dries clear, and the colors they dry to are influenced by their water-resistance qualities. Titebond Original dries pretty much to its light yellow color; Titebond II will be a darker shade of yellow, and Titebond III will dry to a dark brown.
Conservation suitability
Non-archival PVAc is not approved for use by conservators. It is not considered safe for use on paper, board, and other non-metallic archival materials.

Storage and handling
PVAc adhesives should be stored in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight and extreme temperatures.

In summary, non-archival-grade PVAc adhesives are not sufficiently stable, reversible, non-yellowing, and non-offgassing, to qualify them as a reliable choice for long-term preservation in libraries, archives, and museums.

The adhesives I consider acceptable for use on a model include Roger's three "usual suspects" above, with some reservations, and some additions:

Titebond II (or equivalent PVA)
for wood to wood adhesion. Not suitable for paper or thread. Of all the adhesives I now use on models, I consider PVA to be the least acceptable.

Duco Original Formula nitro-cellulose adhesive for all purposes only with a mechanical fastener. Reversible with acetone.

Polystyrene plastic (e.g. Styrofoam) dissolved in acetone only with mechanical fastener - (equivalent to Duco Original Formula.) Reversible with acetone.

Clear shellac in a range of viscosities ("cuts") for all purposes, thin for sealing and for gluing paper-wood, thick for wood-wood but used as an adhesive only with a mechanical fastener. Easily reversible with alcohol.

Paraloid B-72 thermoplastic resin for all purposes except metal to wood, unless a mechanical fastener is used. (Used in a wide range of viscosities: thin as a finish coating through thick for adhesive.) Easily reversible with acetone. Full disclosure: I have not used B-72 as yet but expect I will be using a lot of it in the future. In recent years, B-72 has become the "go-to" sealer and adhesive for professional fine art conservators, restorers, archaeologists, and just about anybody else in the business of putting lots of little pieces back together. (See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paraloid_B-72)

Liquid hide and fish glues for wood-wood, wood-paper. I avoid these because I find synthetic adhesives more agreeable to use, but they could be preferred for restoration work on antique models at times. (Reversable with hot water.)

CAVEATS:

I only use epoxy resin adhesives when absolutely necessary because as a practical matter they are not reversible. Examples of acceptable uses would be repairing a pinned broken spar, assembling small metal to wood subassemblies, or laminating lifts for a solid hull.)

I never use cyanoacrylate adhesives ("Superglue") on models for the same reasons they are rejected as unacceptable by most all top-tier museum curation and restoration shops that now ban the stuff for a variety of reasons including, but not limited to a lack of easy reversal, poor shear strength, and archival uncertainties.


I have four overarching considerations when picking an adhesive for any particular purpose on a model, in order of importance with the most important first:

1. Is it reversible and if so, how easily?

2. What are its archival properties? How long will it last? Will it discolor over time? Does it have acidic properties that are detrimental to the model? Is it compatible with prior or subsequent finish coatings?

3. How good is its holding power for the given application?

4. How convenient is its "workability?" Does it dry too slowly, or too fast, or just right? Is its viscosity correct, or better yet, can its viscosity be easily adjusted? Does it require clamping or not?

With the exception of "the new kid on the block," Paraloid B-72, my above choices have been confirmed over the years by experience and keeping a close watch on the "state of the art best practices" of professionals in the fields of conservation and restoration. I am convinced without any doubt that the single most important quality of an adhesive used on a ship model is its reversibility. It isn't just that the builder may make a mistake that he wants to correct, but also, and perhaps more frequently, if (or when) the model suffers damage the repair of which requires deconstruction the damage can be repaired without further damaging the model.

I'm keenly aware there are those who will say, "I could care less how long the glue with which I build my models lasts as long as it outlasts me." I agree with them. If that's how they feel, there's probably no reason why their models need to last any longer than they do. :D
 
Thank you @ Bob Cleek for all this information. I just want to add that every knot or splice will weaken any thread/tow and be a potential breaking point, not only in modelling. Also the rigging thread itself will age and weaken or become brittle over time, some faster than others. So it isn't only the glue that's to blame for our 'problems'.
 
I think that the use of dilute PVA on line comes from those spinning up linen yarn.
It was suggested as a way to eliminate the fuzz and lock the yarns.
The PVA is Lineco pH7 bookbinders.

Titebond is essentially the same pH as 5% vinegar. III is more acidic than II is more acidic than I.
 
This is awesome. It seems like every other Saturday morning, there's an impassioned discussion on glue. I guess it's pretty central to the hobby and it was part of my question, but I think I know more about glue than I want to at this point. :)

Thanks @Bob Cleek for the awesome reply, as usual I learned a lot. Sadly, I'm not a monkey, despite what I see and do. I simply use the abbreviation PVA for PVAc because who uses polyvinyl alcohol on a ship model these days? I typically use Titebond clear, which is non-yellowing on wood and is the least acidic of the Titebond lineup at pH=~4-5. I know why you would never use Titebond of any kind for prints, books, or photos; cellulose yellowing ruins the party and isn't reversible.


For diluted PVAc wicked into a knot, the pH shouldn't be a problem, especially once dry, even for 100% cotton. Just from chemistry experience. And I think my older, failed line was out of the kit which was probably just polyester. I think you run a bigger risk with PVA on knots than PVAc. PVA is very hydrophilic, similar to paper, which makes a good match on archival print work. But in places like Southern California, PVA can get glassy and brittle in the drier parts of the year. The PVAc matrix is hydrophobic and a bit more gummy and won't be impacted by atmospheric changes in humidity. And I don't think you want a critical knot to be "reversible" due to changing environmental conditions when it's bearing a (hopefully small) load. I think prioritizing reversibility becomes more important in restoration.

@Pepite 1/60 , please tell us more about why every knot and splice makes a weak spot. It doesn't seem far-fetched for knots because you could be stretching and crushing fibers, but splices seem like they would actually be stronger.

Maybe I'm cinching the knots too tight? I just need these models to outlast me, not civilization. Any thoughts on choosing the right line, modern vs. traditional (poly blends vs. 100% cotton), for the reason Pepite 1/60 brings up?
 
Last edited:
Another reason not to rig a model :) Alas, my current project requires it so I too look forward to hearing what others have to say. I have had good luck using watered done white Elmers school glue in years past. Yellow glue has aliphatic resin which make it better suited for wood as it cures harder and sands better than white PVA. White glue remains more elastic and dries clear, maybe better suited for the knots.
Allan
You know @AllanKP69 , I have wondered for years why people (including myself) use yellow glue with furniture when the clear is not discoloring. I guessed it was strength at a magnitude beyond what was needed for a ship model. Of course it's the workability of the additional aliphatic resin! Thanks, never even thought to ask.

The timing is perfect, too. I have made several POF models with the customary natural finish that I love to do. This model is going to have a lot of basswood with primer and paint. What a great time to take advantage of the better workability of the yellow glue than for planking when I'm not going for a wood finish. Home Depot, here I come.
 
I think that the use of dilute PVA on line comes from those spinning up linen yarn.
It was suggested as a way to eliminate the fuzz and lock the yarns.
The PVA is Lineco pH7 bookbinders.

Titebond is essentially the same pH as 5% vinegar. III is more acidic than II is more acidic than I.
Thanks Jaagar, great points. I found this table for Titebond glue and pH. You are pretty much right on the money on the pH.
AdhesivepH
Titebond Clear / Quick & Thick~4.8
Titebond White Glue~4.5
Titebond Original~4.1
Titebond II~2.7–3.0
Titebond III~2.5–3.0
Neutral water7.0
 
Are knots or glued sections of lines more vulnerable to breakage?
Yes, of course they are. Take an electrical cord plugged into the wall. Some people (never me, of course) unplug it just by yanking on the cord. Oftentimes at an angle. And eventually, when the cord frays or breaks, it will be at the plug. Because the plug (or in our case a knot or glued area) creates a stress concentration, multiplying the forces at a tiny area. That's why may electrical cords have a reinforcement or wire coil or such to help prevent this.

With our glued joints and knots this same stress concentration exists. You have a sharp point of harder material (with the glue, especially CA, but also some with PVA), which tends to dig into the rope/string, almost cutting it.

But we can't do much about that. And just because the rope will break there when overstressed, doesn't mean it's normally overstressed. But a small hit on the middle of a rope of a rigged model can cause tremendous stress on the rope, causing it to break or loosen. I wouldn't change your rigging technique; I'd just protect it from being hit in the first place. And after all, we need to also keep dust from covering our precious builds, so a case or other protection is the way to go. And yeah, I know plexi or glass cases can get ridiculously expensive, sometimes exceeding the cost of the model. Which is why my latest Granado build is lying under a pillow case for the moment.
 
I have to admit i have not read all the info above, and personally i think glue makers probably do their best to produce glue which does not destroy whatever is being glued with it ( not great for the reputation), however my tuppence is that a knot will act as a humidity trap and dust trap in comparison with an open line , and it is therefore logical that these will become failure points, especially considering that most house dust is human skin and sweat, which is rather acidic. This is obviously much more relevant if you leave your models out in the open where humidity , dust, and "well meaning cleaners" can access them instead of placing them in a nice comfy cabinet....
 
@Pepite 1/60 , please tell us more about why every knot and splice makes a weak spot. It doesn't seem far-fetched for knots because you could be stretching and crushing fibers, but splices seem like they would actually be stronger.

Maybe I'm cinching the knots too tight? I just need these models to outlast me, not civilization. Any thoughts on choosing the right line, modern vs. traditional (poly blends vs. 100% cotton), for the reason Pepite 1/60 brings up?
Apart from the fibres, a big part of the strenght of a rope comes from friction, the force with witch these fibres are pressed against each other. The more regular and tight a rope is twisted together, the stronger it will be. This is especially true for natural fibres because af their limited fibre length. Now, any disturbace (fault) in the regular flow of these friction forces will weaken that rope. The sharp bends of a knot, together with the inevitable stretching/crushing tightening it, are great at this.
For splicing, you need to unwind part of the rope. That will reduce the friction force that holds the strands together at that part. If overstreched, the rope will break just at one end of the splice, never within (because of the bigger number of fibres there). However, a well done splice will fare a lot better than any knot.
For my modelling, I mostly use waxed polyester thread and try to avoid knots as much as possible. And as splicing such thin threads isn't practical (for me, some experts may succeed in this kind of endeavour), it's mostly up to seizings secured with PVAc glue to hold my rigging up.
And, if you want your models to outlast you, just wait until you're in your sixties to start with the hobby:D.

 
I'm not a monkey, despite what I see and do. I simply use the abbreviation PVA for PVAc because who uses polyvinyl alcohol on a ship model these days? I typically use Titebond clear, which is non-yellowing on wood and is the least acidic of the Titebond lineup at pH=~4-5. I know why you would never use Titebond of any kind for prints, books, or photos; cellulose yellowing ruins the party and isn't reversible.

I'm afraid we're all monkeys or at least related to them one way or the other. I did not even know that there was a difference between PVAc and PVA adhesives, nor that there was an "archival" neutral pH7 version (AKA "bookbinder's" type, as Jaager notes above) until I took a "deep dive" on archival adhesives after reading Rob Napier's great book, Caring for Ship Models A Narrative of Thought and Application (Seawatch Books, 2022.) This book is highly recommended. It's a bit pricey at around $75, IIRC, but it's one of those books that's just packed with useful information that you've probably never seen in print anywhere else. AFAIK, this is the only book on professional ship model repair and conservation that has ever been written. I found it especially helpful because not only does it lay out all the "hows," but it also provides all the "whys," as well.
 
And yeah, I know plexi or glass cases can get ridiculously expensive, sometimes exceeding the cost of the model. Which is why my latest Granado build is lying under a pillow case for the moment.

I use those thin plastic bags the dry cleaners put over your clothes after they clean them. They keep the dust off, but aren't as heavy as cloth.

There sure is a real necessity for a proper case. Many beautiful models have come to grief for want of a protective case. Glass and acrylic sheet is somewhat costly, but the case really should be factored into the equation from the outset. Smaller models call for smaller cases which are less expensive by orders of magnitude. The bigger the model, the more the square area of glass or plastic is going to be required to case it. Few people seem to plan for the cost of the case when they spend over a thousand bucks on one of those four-foot-plus 1:48 scale "cannons and gingerbread" kits. Building your own cases should not be daunting. Making a ship model case is far less of a woodworking challenge than building the model that it will protect ever was.
 
Back
Top