![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE July/August 2026 |
![]() |
![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |

Thank you!SHIPSHAPE! Excellent scale on the masting, spars, and rig; for me, the defining elegance of the real ship. The project is really coming along beautifully.









No Jon, if you look carefully, you'll see that in both drawings the blocks connected to the yard are double blocksPeter, I am no where near this point in my build, but I got curious and checked my limited references. Rigging Period Ship Models by Lennarth Petersson pg 35 shows the jeers as a pair of triple blocks. The Constitution All Sails Up and Flying by Olof A. Eriksen pg 298 and 299 show a triple block and a double block lashed to the yard. Why one method over another, no clue.


Hi Peter, another solution for you; if you don't have double blocks, you can use triple blocks and you can leave one of the sheaves empty.am 90% certain that your implementation is the correct option. (Though now, I have to buy some 3/16" double blocks from Syren. I mostly have triple blocks in that size). What I am curious about is what Ken did here? Would you venture a guess? Where are those thicker tan lines going, since they don't seem to be rigged to the triple block? Is there an alternative rigging plan that I'm unaware of?
Mustafa, our apologies for disturbing you about this on your holiday! But, I replied to Peter privately with that same page 298 drawing reference from Olaf Eriksen's ASUAF book that Jon Gerson did above. And it pretty clearly shows that the top block of those jeer blocks is three sheaves. Is this not the same rigging that Peter was asking about? I'm just clueless as to where the line would fall to.No Jon, if you look carefully, you'll see that in both drawings the blocks connected to the yard are double blocksPetersson used double blocks in the yard too.


Hi Greg, it's undisputed that the top blocks should be triple. Peter is just undecided about the bottom blocks connecting to the yard. They should be double blocks.Mustafa, our apologies for disturbing you about this on your holiday! But, I replied to Peter privately with that same page 298 drawing reference from Olaf Eriksen's ASUAF book that Jon Gerson did above. And it pretty clearly shows that the top block of those jeer blocks is three sheaves. Is this not the same rigging that Peter was asking about? I'm just clueless as to where the line would fall to.
View attachment 622904
As I said to Peter, this rigging is all foreign to me right now, but Olof Eriksen's book has been an interesting read. Enjoy the remainder of your holiday, sir!
Ahhh, my apologies! I read his concerns wrong then about which block he was questioning! I did find the discussion that Olof had in his ASUAF book regarding the details of that DWG-RIG-51 drawing with the references to the double block and triple block. I will send to Peter in a DM if he is interested so as not to continue to clutter your build log, Mustafa. Again, enjoy the remainder of your holiday time!Hi Greg, it's undisputed that the top blocks should be triple. Peter is just undecided about the bottom blocks connecting to the yard. They should be double blocks.

Thank you so much Greg!Again, enjoy the remainder of your holiday time!

Peter, the thicker tan lines are truss pendants.Where are those thicker tan lines going, since they don't seem to be rigged to the triple block? Is there an alternative rigging plan that I'm unaware of?
You are are right!! That's why I need 3 pairs of glasses: trifocal, computer, and reading glassesNo Jon, if you look carefully, you'll see that in both drawings the blocks connected to the yard are double blocksPetersson used double blocks in the yard too.

