My Corel Endeavour did not include any reference to bumpkins in the kit, so now I have to make them. I see what they are , I have the Karl Heinz Marquardt book but I don't know how to make them. They are fastened into square metal fastenings on the deck then round off and are bowed down with lashings to the hull. The kit is 1/60 scale. Any help would be great. Thnx.
-
Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. -
PRE-ORDER SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.
NOTE THAT OUR FIRST ISSUE WILL BE JAN/FEB 2026
If you don't mind can you post a couple photos of the boomkins in the drawings in the Marquardt book. This really has me intrigued. THANK YOU
Are you sure she carried bumpkins? Marquardt's works are fantastic sources, but I can find no evidence based on contemporary sources that she had any bumpkins. Endeavour was a converted Whitby collier, which featured a broad, bluff bow. As a result, the catheads were positioned to point nearly forward and served to work the anchors as well as serve as a convenient, point for the fore tacks, eliminating the need for bumpkins.
If you look at the contemporary drawings of her a on the RMG site, there appears to be no need nor room for bumpkins. MAYBE she still had them but there is no evidence there. The replica in Australia, which many consider an accurate copy has no bumpkins. Your choice, but if you do not add them, you have a lot of evidence that they were not on this ship.
Allan
Are you sure she carried bumpkins? Marquardt's works are fantastic sources, but I can find no evidence based on contemporary sources that she had any bumpkins. Endeavour was a converted Whitby collier, which featured a broad, bluff bow. As a result, the catheads were positioned to point nearly forward and served to work the anchors as well as serve as a convenient, point for the fore tacks, eliminating the need for bumpkins.
If you look at the contemporary drawings of her a on the RMG site, there appears to be no need nor room for bumpkins. MAYBE she still had them but there is no evidence there. The replica in Australia, which many consider an accurate copy has no bumpkins. Your choice, but if you do not add them, you have a lot of evidence that they were not on this ship.
Allan
Have sent photos. Please check below