• Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.

Hms Sussex - A dockyard model made of card

Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Messages
608
Points
403

Location
Alkmaar, Holland
Possible, madness of both?

Although the process of rigging a ship model becomes more and more a problem for me as a result of my fading eye-sight and shaky hands, my urge to keep on building models has no tin the least disappeared. So I went looking for 17th century ship types where no or almost no rigging was involved. After several try-outs with one-masted vessels with comparatively simple riggings my eye fell on the glorious models with which the English shipbuilders tried to seduce the king to commission them to build the full-size ship, the so-called Admiralty or Navy Board dockyard models. These models were usually not rigged at all, but they were lavishly decorated and showed much of their interior and construction. As a result they belong to the most beautiful and intriguing models man has ever made.
In my bookcase Gilbert McArdle's book:Building a Navy Board Model of HMS Sussex 1693, (published bySeawatchBooks in 2010) holds a prominent place.

1.jpg

The book was written during and after McArdle built a flawless copy of the third rate Sussex model in the collection of the US Naval Academy Museum in Annapolis, Maryland. The book contains, apart from the heavily illustrated building report, also a pile of excellent drawings of the original model, containing not only the body plan, elevation plan, top views with decks, sections and various bulkheads, but also every one of the 70 frames in the model has been drawn, both in 1/48 and in 1/96 scale.

Building a paper model of a Navy Board model that still shows some of the beauty of its original example surely is a first grade challenge. Not only the method of building, but also the choice of card is crucial. As a coincidence a colleague at the Rijksmuseum, who knew I am always on the look-out for suitable sorts of card for my shipbuilding activities, collected a pile of beautiful left-over cardboard sheets, used for making pass-partouts for drawings, prints, photographs and whatever belongs to the RM Prentencabinet's collection. I think it is called ivory card. It is made out of textile fibers, has a soft-white color and comes in various thicknesses. My colleague was kind enough to provide me with a lot of 0.5, 1.1, 1.8 and 2.4 mm thick material.

As we all know card has, like every material, apart from a large number of advantages, also some limitations, one of which is that it usually can not be sanded. It will become fluffy and all the sharp edges will disappear. But sanding is precisely what you need when building a dockyard model if you want to show all the open frames in a convincing way. So I made a test piece, consisting of 24 layers (12 midschip frames) of 1.8 mm card and exactly as expected, sanding appeared to be a necessity, even if the cutting was done as precise as possible. I sanded and filed the blok and it appeared that sanding the sides of the card was no problem as long as all layers were as closely pressed to each other as possible, thus avoiding the chance to mess up.

2.png3.png

Scanning my card stock I calculated that if I chose the 1.8 mm thickness ivory card for the frames, Iwould end up with a 30 cm long model, which was about the maximum size I wanted. The scale would then be about 1/200, for me a most unusual number, because all my paper models so far were on a 1/77scale. As every frame consisted of two layers of card, no less than140 frames had to be cut to shape the hull.

Now it was time to design a strategy.The block I made as a test clearly showed that at this scale making a hull out of complete card frames, like in full model size, was not possible because the tops of the frames would end up too narrow tosupply any strength and rigidity to survive the rest of the build, leave alone the expectation of a reasonable life span. So I divided the hull into two horizontal parts, separated by the lower deck, which was, like the frames, cut from 1.8 mm card. Below the deck I vertically divided the hull into two parts, a left and a right one. In separate temporary mountings quarters of frames were to be fitted until both halves were filled with frames, only partly glued together. Indeed it appeared to be possible to sand and file these blocks into shape, almost as if they were made out of wood.

4.png

The part above the lower deck was easy to cut. Both the ship's sides were made out of 0,5 mm card, copied from the side view on McArdles' draught. I cut the port holes, shaped the sides by hand into an S-shaped curve as much as possible, provided them with wales, channels and stairs, laid the basic provisions for the decorations, planked them with latex strips and painted them.

5.png6.png

Though the lower deck was draughted in the book, the upper deck could not precisely be copied from the drawings. I'm afraid I made it too wide, which had a clear effect on the width of the ship between the bulwarks. The model is too wide on top.
It belongs to this style of modeling to show open decks like can be seen in the original model, but the lower deck of my model will be closed, because I need the strength of the 2.4 thick lower deck for the overall rigidity of the model. Besides, practically nothing of it will be visible in the end result.
The deck clamps on the inside of the ship's sides were glued in to fit both the decks on the correct height. The masts could provide sufficient orientation and enough stability to get everything temporarily in place.
7.png

Then keel, stem and stern were cut from1.8 mm card and the whole upper works could carefully be glued together.

8.png9.png10.png11.png

In the mean time the frames-block belowdeck were completed, and sanded into shape. After precisely marking the locations of the interruptions between the frame parts, all frames were separated to cut the inside to shape, taking care that the horizontal top sides were maintained to be glued to the underside of the lower deck in order to get everything back in place.
12.png13.png

Even the sanded block had to be sanded again after all frames were glued in place, but no real problems showed up. It went better than I expected. The next problem to be solved was the lining of the openings between the frames. However precise I tried to be, small deviations from the markings showed up and had to be filed to keep the lines fair. Therefore I modified an old lock file in a way that the thickness was diminished to 1.5 mm and the narrow sides still held their filing profile. A drop of AC glue brought the necessary sharpness back to the joints.
14.png15.png16.png17.png

A real problem is painting the model. I like to build models of ships that are, let's say, halfway or at the end of their career, so wear and tear show up. Therefore I use plastic strips with wood imprint (c-d-fix) for planking and treat it with Humbrol 63 and Van Dijks brown, which produces a nice 'used' look. But a dockyard model does not represent an old ship. On the contrary, the model should look like an ornament, a thing of beauty, adorned with as much golden carvings as possible. I had to invent another way of painting.
On top of that I was stupid enough to forget to spray the plastic planking with primer before I hastily painted it, which caused the paint to wear off as soon as it is touched. I had to remove the paint as much as possible and invent another color to meet the demands.
Special attention had to be given to the stand of the model. Normally I make a very simple card stand, because it serves no other function than to keep the model up right. In this case the model was presented to the king as a thing of beauty and the stand had to meet the same purpose. So I kneaded some dolphins supporting the lower hull with their tails on both sides and gilded them. Inside was a brass tube and a fitting piece of brass wire made the connection. The first couple I made appeared to be too big, so I made a second pair, with a slightly better result.
18.png19.png20.png

I don't know where this will end. Some real problems still have to be tackled. I'll keep you posted.
 
Possible, madness of both?

Although the process of rigging a ship model becomes more and more a problem for me as a result of my fading eye-sight and shaky hands, my urge to keep on building models has no tin the least disappeared. So I went looking for 17th century ship types where no or almost no rigging was involved. After several try-outs with one-masted vessels with comparatively simple riggings my eye fell on the glorious models with which the English shipbuilders tried to seduce the king to commission them to build the full-size ship, the so-called Admiralty or Navy Board dockyard models. These models were usually not rigged at all, but they were lavishly decorated and showed much of their interior and construction. As a result they belong to the most beautiful and intriguing models man has ever made.
In my bookcase Gilbert McArdle's book:Building a Navy Board Model of HMS Sussex 1693, (published bySeawatchBooks in 2010) holds a prominent place.

View attachment 542972

The book was written during and after McArdle built a flawless copy of the third rate Sussex model in the collection of the US Naval Academy Museum in Annapolis, Maryland. The book contains, apart from the heavily illustrated building report, also a pile of excellent drawings of the original model, containing not only the body plan, elevation plan, top views with decks, sections and various bulkheads, but also every one of the 70 frames in the model has been drawn, both in 1/48 and in 1/96 scale.

Building a paper model of a Navy Board model that still shows some of the beauty of its original example surely is a first grade challenge. Not only the method of building, but also the choice of card is crucial. As a coincidence a colleague at the Rijksmuseum, who knew I am always on the look-out for suitable sorts of card for my shipbuilding activities, collected a pile of beautiful left-over cardboard sheets, used for making pass-partouts for drawings, prints, photographs and whatever belongs to the RM Prentencabinet's collection. I think it is called ivory card. It is made out of textile fibers, has a soft-white color and comes in various thicknesses. My colleague was kind enough to provide me with a lot of 0.5, 1.1, 1.8 and 2.4 mm thick material.

As we all know card has, like every material, apart from a large number of advantages, also some limitations, one of which is that it usually can not be sanded. It will become fluffy and all the sharp edges will disappear. But sanding is precisely what you need when building a dockyard model if you want to show all the open frames in a convincing way. So I made a test piece, consisting of 24 layers (12 midschip frames) of 1.8 mm card and exactly as expected, sanding appeared to be a necessity, even if the cutting was done as precise as possible. I sanded and filed the blok and it appeared that sanding the sides of the card was no problem as long as all layers were as closely pressed to each other as possible, thus avoiding the chance to mess up.

View attachment 542973View attachment 542974

Scanning my card stock I calculated that if I chose the 1.8 mm thickness ivory card for the frames, Iwould end up with a 30 cm long model, which was about the maximum size I wanted. The scale would then be about 1/200, for me a most unusual number, because all my paper models so far were on a 1/77scale. As every frame consisted of two layers of card, no less than140 frames had to be cut to shape the hull.

Now it was time to design a strategy.The block I made as a test clearly showed that at this scale making a hull out of complete card frames, like in full model size, was not possible because the tops of the frames would end up too narrow tosupply any strength and rigidity to survive the rest of the build, leave alone the expectation of a reasonable life span. So I divided the hull into two horizontal parts, separated by the lower deck, which was, like the frames, cut from 1.8 mm card. Below the deck I vertically divided the hull into two parts, a left and a right one. In separate temporary mountings quarters of frames were to be fitted until both halves were filled with frames, only partly glued together. Indeed it appeared to be possible to sand and file these blocks into shape, almost as if they were made out of wood.

View attachment 542975

The part above the lower deck was easy to cut. Both the ship's sides were made out of 0,5 mm card, copied from the side view on McArdles' draught. I cut the port holes, shaped the sides by hand into an S-shaped curve as much as possible, provided them with wales, channels and stairs, laid the basic provisions for the decorations, planked them with latex strips and painted them.

View attachment 542976View attachment 542977

Though the lower deck was draughted in the book, the upper deck could not precisely be copied from the drawings. I'm afraid I made it too wide, which had a clear effect on the width of the ship between the bulwarks. The model is too wide on top.
It belongs to this style of modeling to show open decks like can be seen in the original model, but the lower deck of my model will be closed, because I need the strength of the 2.4 thick lower deck for the overall rigidity of the model. Besides, practically nothing of it will be visible in the end result.
The deck clamps on the inside of the ship's sides were glued in to fit both the decks on the correct height. The masts could provide sufficient orientation and enough stability to get everything temporarily in place.
View attachment 542978

Then keel, stem and stern were cut from1.8 mm card and the whole upper works could carefully be glued together.

View attachment 542979View attachment 542980View attachment 542981View attachment 542982

In the mean time the frames-block belowdeck were completed, and sanded into shape. After precisely marking the locations of the interruptions between the frame parts, all frames were separated to cut the inside to shape, taking care that the horizontal top sides were maintained to be glued to the underside of the lower deck in order to get everything back in place.
View attachment 542983View attachment 542984

Even the sanded block had to be sanded again after all frames were glued in place, but no real problems showed up. It went better than I expected. The next problem to be solved was the lining of the openings between the frames. However precise I tried to be, small deviations from the markings showed up and had to be filed to keep the lines fair. Therefore I modified an old lock file in a way that the thickness was diminished to 1.5 mm and the narrow sides still held their filing profile. A drop of AC glue brought the necessary sharpness back to the joints.
View attachment 542985View attachment 542986View attachment 542987View attachment 542988

A real problem is painting the model. I like to build models of ships that are, let's say, halfway or at the end of their career, so wear and tear show up. Therefore I use plastic strips with wood imprint (c-d-fix) for planking and treat it with Humbrol 63 and Van Dijks brown, which produces a nice 'used' look. But a dockyard model does not represent an old ship. On the contrary, the model should look like an ornament, a thing of beauty, adorned with as much golden carvings as possible. I had to invent another way of painting.
On top of that I was stupid enough to forget to spray the plastic planking with primer before I hastily painted it, which caused the paint to wear off as soon as it is touched. I had to remove the paint as much as possible and invent another color to meet the demands.
Special attention had to be given to the stand of the model. Normally I make a very simple card stand, because it serves no other function than to keep the model up right. In this case the model was presented to the king as a thing of beauty and the stand had to meet the same purpose. So I kneaded some dolphins supporting the lower hull with their tails on both sides and gilded them. Inside was a brass tube and a fitting piece of brass wire made the connection. The first couple I made appeared to be too big, so I made a second pair, with a slightly better result.
View attachment 542989View attachment 542990View attachment 542991

I don't know where this will end. Some real problems still have to be tackled. I'll keep you posted.
A PoF cardboard admiralty style model …… now that a big challenge and from what I see …… you are doing a great job, Ab.
Regards, Peter
 
Very interesting project. I'd imagine that dabing the frames with PVA, or very thin CA, would provide an advantage when fairing the hull and general sharpening of corners. Depends on the density of the card. I've done this on past card models with some success using polishing paper of between 1000 and 5000 grit and sanding very lightly. Needs to be confirmed on scrap pieces first.

20250908_171434.jpg
 
Hey,

I think that's pretty crazy. Making a model out of paper! Who does that? :D

Just great. I know that you can do a lot with paper. But it needs a lot of love and tenderness because it's very fragile. One mistake and it's broken, and mending isn't always nice, especially as you can always see that spot.

Hats off and also hats off to this scale ... I'm still with you ...Thumbsup
 
Another fascinating build, Ab. Thanks for sharing it with us.

I don't know if this will be helpful, but I've had success working with cardstock that needed to be shaped by sanding to saturate the cardstock with thinned shellac before sanding. This creates a composite paper and shellac material similar to that once commonly used by the electronics industry early on for insulated coil winding armatures, circuit boards, and the like. Once the shellac is dry, the material is quite hard and the shellac permits sanding without raising fuzz on the surface.
 
Thanks for the encouragement @GIG1810 . I think I am just as curious how the rest of the project will develop as you are :-).

@Bob Cleek: Thank you for the suggestion. So far sanding the sides of the paper went quite well, but there are areas of which I was wondering how to tackle the problem. My thoughts went in the direction of CA glue, but I am a bit reluctant about that stuff. Thinned PVA glue was another option, but thinned shellac may be the better choice, although I do not plan to use it in such quantities as it was done in the example you mention. Experimenting is one of the pleasures of this hobby. Even if it leads to failure. It's just a bit of card that is wasted.

@tomsimon: Thee are even many paths that lead to total failure, but it is not the resulting model that counts. My pleasure is in the action. But of course everyone is free to find satisfaction in in whatever stage of building, even in the end result, be it successful or not.
 
Wow, what a magnificent undertaking! I wouldn't even dare to build an admiralty model out of plastic. You mentioned above that you chose a different color than Humbrol 63 for the hull. May I ask which one you chose?
Schmidt
 
I'm very impressed with what you can make out of card stock. Looks fantastic, great build, thanks for sharing. I like the idea of showing the ship in midlife as you stated, not new, but just right.
 
Thank you for your reaction @Namabiiru, @Schmidt, @Hubac’s Historian and @dpktraf11.

@Schmidt: After doing some tests I decided to stay at Humbrol 63 for the upper works, sprayed with shining varnish. (63 itself is a matt paint and I wanted a shiny appearance) . As to the lower part with all the frames I havent decided yet. Perhaps I will paint them a little brighter by adding some yellow. But nothing decided yet. This project grows like a tree....
 
I see Bob beat me to it, but I would suggest shellac to give the card an additional hardness and make it both conducive to accurate abrasion and accurate work with the scalpel.

And as others have said, what a superb piece of craftsmanship to bring it to this state.

Jim
 
The more I build, the more I get convinced that the medium used hardly makes any difference. It's a matter of mastering the material one works with. That is sometimes tough, but I don't see any real difference with working in wood, metal or plastic.
Goedenavond, Ab. I agree with you, ultimately it doesn't matter what material you use. You do that perfectly. In general, it's a question of what you want to represent. For me, the decisive factor is whether the model accurately reflects the original. In Germany, we have a wonderful model maker, Werner Zimmermann. One of his core principles is, “it has to look like it.” But not to be. Of course, you have to have certain technical skills. But do I have to implement them to excess in every case? Why do I have to drill hundreds of holes at 1:64 scale when a few dots of paint will do the trick?
I build with wood, come from a family of craftsmen, and love wood as a material. For some time now, since I've been following your work, I'm no longer so sure whether wood is still the best way to build model ships in my old age. I admire what you conjure up from the material. Now I'm back to pondering. My eyes aren't so great anymore, and my heart sets limits for weeks at a time. That's life, but we will continue, I think.

All the best, Manfred

Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
 
Thank you @ceestoorn ,@Jim Fortnam and @Mash. Manfred: I am happy that other ripened builders start to agree with my choice of material. Actually it's partly just laziness. Just like you I built wooden ships all my life and thoroughly enjoyed it. Paper is just easier to approach and the time it takes to get results is much shorter.

As you can see work on the upper works and stern continued this week, but I left the lower part of the hull untouched so far, enjoying all the good suggestions that were made here. I gilded the stands, but I find them a bit too shiny in comparison with the model, which has no gilding yet (only gold paint) and I have many hesitations for using real gold for it. I really have to struggle to get rid of my love for worn out ships in this case. I seem to be a bit scared of brilliantly shiny images.

21.png22.png23.png

By the way, I am highly surprised by the amount of interest on this forum: 268 readers and counting. On Papermodelers.com there were all in all 6 reactions (and 597 views by the way), which may be a sign of disinterest in the subject, but of course that site is mainly about airplanes. Not many shipbuilders there (though some very good ones).

Another aspect I have postponed so far is the adjustment of the decks. I am afraid I will have to make some really destructive changes there, aiming at a narrower deck and still pondering about a way to show all the carlings and ledges in the open areas. I think I will have to practice a bit on the forecastle and quarterdeck to get the hang of it.

Thank you all for your interest and suggestions. Much appreciated!
 
Back
Top