• Ships of Scale has incorportated an extra level of security when you log In. Please follow on-screen prompts to acknowledge that you are not a robot via a "Check Box" or a "Pictorial Check Box Puzzle". This is needed due to higher level of AI Activity Security.
  • SUBSCRIBE TO SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!

    The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
    Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.

    NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE July/August 2026
  • Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.

I have a question on models.

The question is why are there so many people doing models like constitution, bounty, Endeavor, Santa Maria, Victory but not Batavia or seven provicien? Is it not an interesting ship?

One reason could be that when you first get into the hobby, you’ll probably choose a model whose name or history is already familiar to you, such as the Bounty, Victory, etc. Later, as your skills develop, you start choosing models that you’re genuinely interested in for whatever reason.
 
Why so many HMS Victories? Apparently Nelson had a good PR guy. These 100 gun sailing barges are not blessed with attractive hull lines. They needed very full lines to carry all that weight, and Trafalgar was a hammer and tongs battle in barely enough wind to move them.

If you must build a Royal Navy sailing warship with its rows of cannons, how about something that fought at Quiberon Bay? That battle had huge impact on the outcome of the Seven Years and involved chasing the French Fleet into a rock filled bay in the teeth of a full gale. Real seamanship!

Roger
 
Why so many HMS Victories? Apparently Nelson had a good PR guy. These 100 gun sailing barges are not blessed with attractive hull lines. They needed very full lines to carry all that weight, and Trafalgar was a hammer and tongs battle in barely enough wind to move them.

If you must build a Royal Navy sailing warship with its rows of cannons, how about something that fought at Quiberon Bay? That battle had huge impact on the outcome of the Seven Years and involved chasing the French Fleet into a rock filled bay in the teeth of a full gale. Real seamanship!

Roger

or how about the biggest first rate ever built there are drawings as well as archaeological data to reconstruct the ship as a model



HMS St Lawrence
was a 112-gun first-rate ship of the line of the Royal Navy that served on Lake Ontario during the War of 1812. Built on the lake at the Royal Navy dockyard in Kingston, Upper Canada, she was the only Royal Navy ship of the line ever to be launched and operated entirely in fresh water, Constructed in 1814, the ship's arrival on the lake ended all naval action and St Lawrence finished the war having never gone into battle. Following the war, the vessel was laid up, eventually being sold in 1832 to private interests. The ship later sank and is now a recreational dive spot.

Description​

Master shipbuilder John Dennis and nearly 200 shipwrights built St Lawrence in under ten months, although several sources credit master shipwright William Bell as the designer and builder. Unlike sea-going ships of the line, St Lawrence was constructed without a quarterdeck, poop deck or forecastle. This gave the vessel the appearance of a spar-deck frigate. Furthermore, St Lawrence was not expected to make long ocean voyages and did not have to carry the same amount of stores and provisions. This allowed the designers to make savings in the vessel's capacity.[2] The shipwrights constructed a vessel larger and more heavily gunned than the flagship of Horatio Nelson at the Battle of Trafalgar, HMS Victory
 
Back
Top