• Ships of Scale has incorportated an extra level of security when you log In. Please follow on-screen prompts to acknowledge that you are not a robot via a "Check Box" or a "Pictorial Check Box Puzzle". This is needed due to higher level of AI Activity Security.
  • SUBSCRIBE TO SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!

    The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
    Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.

    NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE July/August 2026
  • Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.

Kits as waterlinemodel?

Joined
Sep 5, 2018
Messages
208
Points
113

I’ve accumulated quite a few model kits—probably more than I’ll ever have time to build.
One idea is to build some of them as waterline models; that would save both time and space.
Is it feasible to convert kits into waterline models, and what should I keep in mind if I do?
 
It is absolutely feasible. I presume you are referring to plastic kits. The main thing to be aware of is that when you cut away the bottom of a hull, you are increasing the likelihood of introducing slight A-symmetries to the hull, as various internal tensions are either released or exacerbated. The larger the scale, the more pronounced you can expect this issue to be.

For example, I cut away the problematic lower hull of Heller’s Soleil Royal. My mistake was in cutting each hull half separately, before gluing it together. This immediately created several problems that were challenging to overcome.

First of all, it was tricky to flatten that cut line without pulling the stem out of plumb. I happened to be widening the hull, at the stem, so there was a natural opportunity to correct that problem. It was hella-tedious, though, and it would have been so much simpler to have glued the hull together, first, so that I could get a consistent cut line all the way around the hull. Flattening all of this at once would have been much simpler.

Secondly, despite taking great pains to place the hull halves, clamped together at the stem, upon a base sheet of 1/16” styrene, so that I wasn’t introducing any additional tensions - I didn’t realize that the port and starboard sides were no longer following the same hull curvature: the starboard side had become a little flatter, now, and this only became apparent to me when it came time to make the new upper decks from scratch. As I was lining-out the planking strakes, I could see that the layout would be close, but not symmetrical. I’ve gotten to be very good at coping mismatched parts together, but I could have made this much easier, in the first place.

So, my advice to you - before you cut anything - would be to glue your hull halves together first. Cut ample internal bracing for the hull’s interior, so that the breadth and curvature of the hull remain consistent during and after the cutting; this bracing could take the form of full or partial bulkheads, which will add quite a lot of structural rigidity to the model. In larger scales, I would say this is essential. In smaller scales, you could probably get away with simple athwart-ships rod or stick bracing.

If you are building steel navy ships, it would probably also be advisable to glue-in the main deck, in order to preserve the hull shape.

For the cutting, access to a well-tuned bandsaw makes the quickest and easiest work of this. I would build a simple balsa carriage to hold the model’s waterline perpendicular to the bandsaw table.

Afterwards, you can tape 100 grit paper to either a glass table top or a metal circular saw table, or to a board that has been jointed dead-flat, to grind the rough edge down to a uniform waterline.

If you don’t have access to a bandsaw, you can achieve very good results with a Japanese-style pull-saw. Just mark off your waterline and use brightly contrasting painters’ tape along the waterline so that you can more clearly gauge your progress. Be sure to leave yourself a heavy 1/32”, away from the line, for final fairing. In larger scales, I would leave maybe a 1/16”.

Lastly, be sure to make some allowance for the hull to sit in whatever sort of diorama sea you have in-mind.
 
It’s not only feasible, it might be a good idea. Some kit manufacturers used to be what might politely be called “casual” about accurately reproducing accurate cull lines for specific named vessels. Cutty Sark? Thermopylae? Well they’re both clippers.

A waterline model eliminates a misshapen underwater hull form and allows focus on making a more accurate and possibly more artistic model.

Roger
 
I have both plastic and wooden models.
Reinforcing the hull before cutting off the lower section is likely necessary for a wooden model as well.
My plan here is that it should suffice to mount the frames onto the keel and glue in the false deck, plank a few strips along the top of the hull, and then mark the waterline on the frames and glue—for instance—pieces of plywood between the frames at the waterline level before cutting the frames with a Dremel.
Another advantage of a waterline model is that it is easier to handle, as the hull can be securely screwed onto a wooden board.
 
Back
Top