![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
they didn't intend to transit the bridge. they were out of controlWhy did they try? Surely they knew the height of their masts and the height of the bridge at a given state of the tide.


This video gives some insight to what happened.Why did they try? Surely they knew the height of their masts and the height of the bridge at a given state of the tide.



1. You do not have to be very bright or be a very experienced OD to realize that YOU SHOULD HAVE THE GD TUGS TIED TIGHT TO YOUR VESSEL WHEN TRANSITTING A TIGHT, TORTUROUS ANDok guys here's my speculation on the accident. many variable pitch propellers go to full astern when there is a malfunction. this is my guess for the cause of the accident
Looks like the tug was assigned to push her bow around so that she was headed south away from the bridge. If her engine and propellor had been operating properly she would have been able to power south safely and we wouldn't be discussing her departure. However, it seems that a basic rule of safety was ignored: you should consider what could go wrong* and plan for that. As Bill points out, the tug could easily have been secured to the vessel and kept control if there was a malfunction. My thoughts are with those who grieve.1. You do not have to be very bright or be a very experienced OD to realize that YOU SHOULD HAVE THE GD TUGS TIED TIGHT TO YOUR VESSEL WHEN TRANSITTING A TIGHT, TORTUROUS AND
UNPREDICTABLE MANEUVER such as they were undertaking. My guess is that ANY USN DECK FORCE E1 WOULD KNOW HOW TO HANDLA THIS PROBLEM.
2. This problem was created through pure stupidity. PERIOD! No excuses accepted.
3. IF their propellor was in reverse due to incompetent maintenance that just makes their excuses all the more pathetic and unacceptable.
