• LUCZORAMA SHIPWRECK SCAVENGER HUNT GIVEAWAY. 4 Weeks of Fun • 1 Legendary Prize ((OcCre’s Fram Ship)) • Global Crew Welcome!
    **VIEW THREAD HERE**

Staghound...Extreme clipper 1850 by rwiederrich 1/96

Hey Rob,

very nice realization of the roofs for the companionways. Looks even livelier this way. The work on the forecastle is excellent.
Question; Are those your self-made nails? They look fantastic. Why are they black?

Best regards
Günther Ship-1
 
Looking good, Rob! Thumbsup
Thanks Peter...

Rob
Hey Rob,

very nice realization of the roofs for the companionways. Looks even livelier this way. The work on the forecastle is excellent.
Question; Are those your self-made nails? They look fantastic. Why are they black?

Best regards
Günther Ship-1
It has taken lots of research to conclude that she had 2 companionways on her forecastle....leading down 3ft to her decks below, where her patent capstan driven windless was stored. Among the , "Lofty, airy, well lit" topgallant forecastle crews quarters. The *nails* you are referencing are called belaying pins. And they are blackened, because they are made from brass. I didn't want brass pins. Typically, they(older ones), would be made from a dark hardwood...newer ones were made from iron.

Rob
 
Rob,
When you put a human face on it, you can see why it makes sense that the portico roof would have a safety rail surrounding it.
Well after much analysis, we resolved ourselves to believe that this limited real state.....just under the boom needed access....thus safety for men working the boom/gaff, rigging. To have left this elevated space open would indicate a man had to climb on top of the unprotected roof to secure, said rigging. Not very practical on a heaving, pitching deck. It was the logical conclusion. And since we have no photographic evidence denouncing the conclusion.....we win.

Rob
 
Really nice detail, Rob. Very convincingly Victorian era style. The hulls of these ships had such an advanced dynamic profile that the mid 19th c. decorative taste is a little jarring in juxtaposition.
 
Well after much analysis, we resolved ourselves to believe that this limited real state.....just under the boom needed access....thus safety for men working the boom/gaff, rigging. To have left this elevated space open would indicate a man had to climb on top of the unprotected roof to secure, said rigging. Not very practical on a heaving, pitching deck. It was the logical conclusion. And since we have no photographic evidence denouncing the conclusion.....we win.

Rob
Rob,
Actually, we have documentary evidence to rely on. Seeing how ornately designed the main facade on the aft coach house was on Glory of the Seas is our photographic proof. Her entire coach house deck was surrounded by a safety rail. When these vessels are envisioned as real working ships on a human scale instead of mantlepiece decorations such details just become apparent.
 
Really nice detail, Rob. Very convincingly Victorian era style. The hulls of these ships had such an advanced dynamic profile that the mid 19th c. decorative taste is a little jarring in juxtaposition.
Staghound was very limited with her deck furniture....so her forecastle and poop bulkheads were pretty much all that was available to detail....not excluding her main house of course. Compare this to Glory of the Seas carriage house front.

cabin front3.webp
 
Rob,
Actually, we have documentary evidence to rely on. Seeing how ornately designed the main facade on the aft coach house was on Glory of the Seas is our photographic proof. Her entire coach house deck was surrounded by a safety rail. When these vessels are envisioned as real working ships on a human scale instead of mantlepiece decorations such details just become apparent.
I agree...we have documented evidence that such structures had protective railings.....just not any direct evidence on Staghound herself. We conclude by way of practice and what was evidenced on similar structures, from vessels made by the same shipwright. That indirect evidence can respectfully be projected to Staghound. I fully agree.

Rob
 
Back
Top