Victory - A comparison between the Occre and Caldercraft models

Any rating system (I've done something similar when buying new cars, etc.) should have each rating multiplied by an importance factor, or have larger numbers associated with them. In your example, Occre gets 5 points for including an oak stand, yet Caldercraft gains only 3 points for having better drawings and instructions. You'd really have a premade stand than good plans and instructions? I'd consider them MUCH more important than the stand. Maybe more like 0-3 points for the stand and 0-50 points for the plans and instructions.

You are right about weighting system -I had thought about it but is gets a bit complicated for a forum like this. Having used them in my IT career choosing systems I realised it does not really matter as points are only an indication of which system/model is best - as I pointed out its only an indication - after all an experienced modeller does not need such detailed plans as a beginner

Re cost - went to an Air show yesterday and people spend £10K on a model fighter aircraft (1/4 scale F16 - looks just like the real jet)- mind you they do go 200mph!
 
WOW! Both ship models are absolutely beautiful. However, I would have a very difficult time explaining spending $1600 (Caldercraft) or $1400 (Occre) on a model. Those costs are way out of my league.
I thought the same originally. But see the thread: Which "HMS Victory" kit - Caldercraft or Panart? started in Jan 2024.
 
In my humble opinion, both look great, but I would MUCH rather build the Caldercraft, sails or no sails. Beautiful work, though!
Rick1011
 
Bonjour, j'ai réalisé un modèle du Hms Victory à l'échelle 1/64e avec les voiles et le gréement. C'est un choix que j'ai fait avant la construction (sur plans du musée national de Greenwich et des livres de John McKay, Alan McGowan, Nepean Longridge et autres documents). Il est vrai que selon les angles de visions sur le modèle, le gréement est en partie caché par les voiles. C'est le choix que j'avais fait à l'époque et peut-être pas le meilleur.

Francis

Hello, I made a model of Hms Victory in 1/64 scale with sails and rigging. This is a choice I made before construction (based on plans from the National Museum of Greenwich and books by John McKay, Alan McGowan, Nepean Longridge and other documents). It is true that depending on the viewing angles on the model, the rigging is partly hidden by the sails. This is the choice I made at the time and perhaps not the best.

View attachment 472307

View attachment 472308
Very good work - maybe once you are able to show more details f.e. in a topic here:

 
Bonjour, j'ai réalisé un modèle du Hms Victory à l'échelle 1/64e avec les voiles et le gréement. C'est un choix que j'ai fait avant la construction (sur plans du musée national de Greenwich et des livres de John McKay, Alan McGowan, Nepean Longridge et autres documents). Il est vrai que selon les angles de visions sur le modèle, le gréement est en partie caché par les voiles. C'est le choix que j'avais fait à l'époque et peut-être pas le meilleur.

Francis

Hello, I made a model of Hms Victory in 1/64 scale with sails and rigging. This is a choice I made before construction (based on plans from the National Museum of Greenwich and books by John McKay, Alan McGowan, Nepean Longridge and other documents). It is true that depending on the viewing angles on the model, the rigging is partly hidden by the sails. This is the choice I made at the time and perhaps not the best.

View attachment 472307

View attachment 472308
Superb model, particularly the sails. Would you explain your photography method please? Black and white background, colour Victory.
 
Bonjour, j'ai réalisé un modèle du Hms Victory à l'échelle 1/64e avec les voiles et le gréement. C'est un choix que j'ai fait avant la construction (sur plans du musée national de Greenwich et des livres de John McKay, Alan McGowan, Nepean Longridge et autres documents). Il est vrai que selon les angles de visions sur le modèle, le gréement est en partie caché par les voiles. C'est le choix que j'avais fait à l'époque et peut-être pas le meilleur.

Francis

Hello, I made a model of Hms Victory in 1/64 scale with sails and rigging. This is a choice I made before construction (based on plans from the National Museum of Greenwich and books by John McKay, Alan McGowan, Nepean Longridge and other documents). It is true that depending on the viewing angles on the model, the rigging is partly hidden by the sails. This is the choice I made at the time and perhaps not the best.

View attachment 472307

View attachment 472308
I love the fact that you have sails, that is my preference. A sailing ship looks naked without them. Without sails, the running rigging loses it's purpose, and the storage locations of such rigging hide the purpose of those lines.
 
When I started the Occre Victory I thought it might be interesting to compare it to the Caldercraft Victory I made a decade ago. This might help people to decide which of the two models they should go for – it would seem that they are both represent the top of the Victory model range each with a cost in excess of £1k.

Anyway as I am now on the rigging stage of the Occre its about time to give my humble opinion of the plus and minus of each version
So here goes……………….

As you see below I have scored each model using a variety of categories, giving each a score or 1-5 (1 being low and 5 high). As you can see the Occre Victory comes out top with a score of 60 with the Caldercraft having a score of 53. In other words according to my scoring criteria they are both score almost the same. As any project manager would tell you (I am one from the IT world!) scoring is all very well but what counts is what one actually thinks

A big plus with the Occre are the Sails, Oak Hull and the small size. A big big negative is the lack of instructions and terminology just missing. Once you start making the model one forgets all about the posh box it came in (it comes in a custom made wooden box complete with limited edition medals etc). Having just started the rigging my knowledge of the terminology of the Victory is no further forward than when I started – they don’t even mention the various decks, catharpins and futtocks!. I build model to lean about the ship – its not just a collection of wood and metal which is the impression Occre seems to have.

The Caldercraft copperplated hull is a big plus – its really does look good. Also the instructions are simply superb. When I built it I was not an expert builder of models – the most complex model I had made was very simple model ships and planes in my youth. However the instructions enabled me to build it without too much trouble; when I got stuck - which was’nt very often a quick look at this forum put me right.

A comment on the Occre Victory by Neilm is worth noting – he says “Occre just abandons any detail after the main build. Poor customer care, loads of money on the kit and such poor instructions. Shame on them . Avoid this kit if you haven’t the skills to rig.”

He is right on all counts; however I have got to make my mind up. Which model is better..

I have to say for a modeller without too much experience the Caldercraft is the better one to make. This is due to the superb, easy to follow instructions and also the fact that you learn all the nautical terminology.

For the more experienced modeller I have to say its rather a toss up between the two. To simplify matters – if you want sails chose Occre, for a copper bottom choose Caldercraft
What do you all think??,. Let the debate start

I do like making a Victory – am very tempted to make a cross section – but that’s next years project as I guess the rigging on the Occre will take me into Feb/March next year.

Have put photos of the two models side by side so you can make your own mind up


Category

Details
O – Occre
C - Caldercraft

Occre

Caldercraft

Cost

O – approx. £1,250 – but you do get sails
C – approx. £1,050 – copper bottom

5

4

Size

O – Scale 1:87. 1172 long, 785 high
C – Scale 1:72. 1385mm long, 940 high

5

5

Hull - Ribs

O – Oak exposed so can see ribs construction
C – Plywood so more accurate and quicker to build

5

4

Main Cabin

O – Windows better and metalwork easier to fit (no individual items)
C – Metal work all pre formed so looks more accurate

4

3

Guns

O – Provide jig so easier to make carriages. Every gun has a gun carriage. However no side tackles
C – Lower guns fit into hole in plywood ribs. However side tackles are provided

4

4

Fittings

C – more metal fittings provided – ie Oars, hooks for rigging

3

5

Plans and instructions

O – Instructions do not mention any nautical terms and just do not cover the rigging at all
C – Very good instructions, really detailed ‘how to do’ . Plan also good complete with dimension’s for masts

2

5

Jigs

O – Lots of jigs provided (they are needed for the rib construction)
C – Cannot remember if provided. Does not matter as everything fitted.

5

3

Rigging materials

O – Not as many different sets of threads as Caldercraft

3

4

Sails

O – Full set of sails
C – No sails

5

0

Historical accuracy

Gun ports are not flush on both models
I do not know enough to make a comparison / judgement on either model

3

3

Bulwarks

O – Netting provided which make bulwarks look good

4

3

Masts and spars

C – Overwhelming advantage in making due to dimensions on drawings.
O - Do not provide large blocks for fitting spars.
Also mast cross sections not as detailed

2

5

Quality of materials

Cannot really differentiate between the two.
Yes Occre has oak ribs but Caldercraft has a copper bottom

5

5

Stand

O – Rather nice Oak stand with legs to mount the completed model on
C – You have to make your own!

5

0

Total score

60

53

View attachment 471530

View attachment 471531

View attachment 471532

View attachment 471533

View attachment 471535
Thanks for posting this comparison! It is very useful for choosing between the two kits. Many members debate the details of the scoring, but what's important is knowing the contents of the kit, and how the model looks when completed. The shape and proportions of the components is very important as Uwe pointed out if one is looking for accuracy in a model. Details like the windows, lack of sails, and other accessories can be replaced or scratch built, but for most modelers, accuracy comes first.
 
Back
Top