- Joined
- Oct 9, 2020
- Messages
- 2,287
- Points
- 488

I love following your work. It`s inspiring me to do better. Pls don`t stop.
![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE MARCH/APRIL 2026 |
![]() |

Thanks, Cap'n Jack. I enjoy following your work as well!I love following your work. It`s inspiring me to do better. Pls don`t stop.
Perhaps I don’t know the definition of a sycophant, but I thought it was boot licking behavior aimed at personal gain? In which case this isn’t a proper use of the word, since I fail to see how us complimenting Paul has any personal advantage or gain?Waldemar,
I’ve read the entire exchange carefully, public posting and direct message, and I feel compelled to reach out to you (publicly and direct).
It seems you misread Paul, plain and simple. His message to you was respectful, appreciative, and honest about his own limitations. There was no mockery, no hidden agenda, and certainly no demand for flattery. What you interpreted as insincerity says far more about your expectations than about his intent.
Paul did something that is not always easy in a technical discussion - he acknowledged expertise while also admitting where he stands. That is not dishonesty; that is humility. Dismissing that as manipulation or “narcissistic adoration” is not only unfair, it undermines the very kind of exchange that keeps a community like this alive.
You speak of experience and age, yet you chose to respond with suspicion rather than generosity, and with accusation rather than guidance. If every sincere expression of thanks is treated as deception, then meaningful dialogue becomes impossible.
Let me be clear, Paul did not need to “justify himself.” He was already on solid ground. The only thing that shifted in that exchange was the tone, and it did not shift because of him, because of you.
You are, of course, free to disengage. But stepping away after mischaracterizing someone’s intentions and labeling others (us) as sycophants is not a position of strength; it’s simply closing the door after creating unnecessary conflict (not the first time), with other members, perhaps. Paul treated you with respect and dignity. He deserved the same in return.


A perfect explanation, nicely said.I think we discussed before that in text we are often misconstrued because we don’t see body language or hear a voice. So people don’t always know how to take words by themselves.

@Dean62 This is a superb posting - a lot of wisdom is contained herein.I will say one last thing Paul. I often become discouraged and even upset by the disrespect, selfishness and inconsideration of my own children. It’s not frequent, but even in small doses, it stings. I expect the people of the world around me to behave this way, but even my loved ones are guilty. And then I have to remind myself that perhaps my expectations of others is not realistic. And I ask myself have I not been guilty of the same at some point in my life? So I understand your upset, but keep your expectations of others realistic and you won’t be so disappointed. And I think we discussed before that in text we are often misconstrued because we don’t see body language or hear a voice. So people don’t always know how to take words by themselves.
...and if there are different languages being translated, that exacerbates the problem! Being an international forum, we must also keep this in mind when communicating by text.






Here's something unexpected - right in the middle of a lover's spat - a ship model showed up...
This is the third deck of this beast of a stern section shown as a work in progress. Ledges (and more dovetails) are up next.
View attachment 586774
View attachment 586778
View attachment 586776
View attachment 586777
View attachment 586773
View attachment 586775
Once again, I am on a pace for this deck to take about a month.
I thought about this for a bit today. This particular stern section model is roughly 1/4 of the total ship length. This means that each of the full decks would take something in the four-month range to complete if I was building the full ship. Multiply that by three full length decks and it turns into one year. One year just to build the full-length decks. To that we would need to add the quarter deck (which is a bit simpler) and the small poop deck (simpler still). In other words, well over a year (year and a half?) just to fabricate deck infrastructure with no waterways, decking, hatches... no staircases, rooms or doors... no deck furniture or fittings...
It's mind blowing to consider the time and effort to build a full-size POF ship of this size.

In that time they build the complete ship in real lifeHere's something unexpected - right in the middle of a lover's spat - a ship model showed up...
This is the third deck of this beast of a stern section shown as a work in progress. Ledges (and more dovetails) are up next.
View attachment 586774
View attachment 586778
View attachment 586776
View attachment 586777
View attachment 586773
View attachment 586775
Once again, I am on a pace for this deck to take about a month.
I thought about this for a bit today. This particular stern section model is roughly 1/4 of the total ship length. This means that each of the full decks would take something in the four-month range to complete if I was building the full ship. Multiply that by three full length decks and it turns into one year. One year just to build the full-length decks. To that we would need to add the quarter deck (which is a bit simpler) and the small poop deck (simpler still). In other words, well over a year (year and a half?) just to fabricate deck infrastructure with no waterways, decking, hatches... no staircases, rooms or doors... no deck furniture or fittings...
It's mind blowing to consider the time and effort to build a full-size POF ship of this size.

But they didn't have all those wise guys standing around the construction site having all those debates; they just kept right on working.In that time they build the complete ship in real life![]()

True enough, Dean. But the finish for me is anticlimactic - I much prefer the journey (or perhaps, the small finishes along the way).Beautiful!
Ship models can be very time consuming. I’ve said before, that’s why I build some of my plastic airplane models, that are completed in days or weeks… at least that way I remember what it’s like to finish something!![]()
"time is irrelevant" is a nice thought...Witaj
Pawle czas jest nieistotny liczy się efekt końcowy. a on na pewno będzie rewelacyjny. Pozdrawiam Mirek
In that time they build the complete ship in real life![]()
That's what I need! A workforce suitable for the Arsenal de Rochefort!But they didn't have all those wise guys standing around the construction site having all those debates; they just kept right on working.![]()

