• Ships of Scale has incorportated an extra level of security when you log In. Please follow on-screen prompts to acknowledge that you are not a robot via a "Check Box" or a "Pictorial Check Box Puzzle". This is needed due to higher level of AI Activity Security.
  • SUBSCRIBE TO SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!

    The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
    Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.

    NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE July/August 2026
  • Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.

Another Airfix 1/72 Golden Hind Build Review – Part 1

Joined
May 10, 2026
Messages
21
Points
48

I note that there’s another in-progress Airfix Golden Hind build log in this forum (and very impressive it’s looking…). I don’t want to duplicate, but I believe that my build is sufficiently different that it may provide additional information/inspiration for anyone who is considering tackling this venerable (it’s coming up for 50 years old!) kit.

There are three versions of this kit. The original was released in 1977 and sold unchanged for 20 years. The Special Edition was sold from 1997 – 2018 when the current Vintage Classics version was released. The Special Edition and Vintage Classics versions differ from the original only in having additional detail on some mouldings, most notably raised lines on the hull exterior that define the pattern of coloured triangles. As far as I know, there is no difference in the mouldings for these two later versions other than that the Special Edition that I’m working on is moulded in dark, chocolate brown plastic while the more recent Vintage Classics version appears to be provided in a lighter, tan-coloured plastic.

gh6.jpg

I bought this Special Edition of the Golden Hind on eBay for an absurdly low price and I have no idea how old it actually is: the Special Edition was released in 1997, so this example could be anything from almost 30 years old to less than ten. The box has been opened, but almost everything seems to be there – the only part I can see that’s missing is the cover for one of the hawse pipes (Part 14) though I would probably have replaced those anyway. This is my first attempt at a sailing ship kit, though I’m a fairly experienced plastic modeller. I don’t plan to make major changes to the basic kit, though I will add some detail and at least attempt rigging.

I’ll keep these reports fairly brief, covering just the high (and low…) points of each stage of the build. If you want more information and additional pics, I will include a link to the more detailed build log on my blog site (Model Kit World) at the end of each part.

OK, let’s get started. I begin with the stand. The small plastic stand provided is, IMHO, much too narrow to be stable and the hull simply rests in two shallow indentations for the keel with two rather thin side supports that are intended to be butt-joined to the lower hull sides. I screwed the kit stand to a larger and heavier circular wooden base and replaced the kit side supports with heavy-duty replacements made from thick sprue from the kit – these were drilled and tapped at the top and bottom. They are screwed into the kit stand from underneath and I’ll also put screws from inside the hull into the top of these supports. I’ll be painting the stand and varnishing the wooden base eventually, but for the moment, this is what I have.

ghb12.jpg

Next, the hull halves. These are completely devoid of detail on the inside, where the hull interior will be visible above the main decks. I have added some simple internal structure using plastic strip and scribed some lines to represent planking.

ghb3.jpg

I then painted the inside part of the hull where it will be visible. I used acrylic paints and I generally use Vallejo products simply because these are widely available here in Spain where I live. I used the same approach I have used for wood in the past: I first painted it with a base coat of Vallejo Dark Sand (a very light tan) and added lighter and darker areas to provide visual interest – these will show through the translucent top coat. I then gave it several diluted washes using a dark brown semi-transparent paint, Vallejo Mahogany Ink. This gives a variable finish that I hope reproduces the look of aged wood. I then joined the hull halves which were slightly warped and it took a fair amount of clamping and taping to get everything aligned. I then screwed the completed hull to the base.

ghb19.jpg

I then work on the internal bulkheads. I use the same approach for painting as on the hull, but I have made some changes here. Airfix suggest that these bulkheads are painted in the same triangular coloured pattern as used on the hull exterior. I find that hard to imagine. This was, after all, a warship, and I just can’t see that the interior would have been painted with such elaborate decoration. This is one of the bulkheads, as provided.

gh15.jpg

I have filled and sanded the deeply engraved panel lines that delineate the coloured pattern, scribed some vertical planking instead and painted them to look like plain wood. I have also made gaps in the balustrades under which I will add access ladders – none are provided here. I also opened out the small windows in the aft bulkhead and I’ll be creating something to represent mullioned glass to use here. One of the nice things about working on a model of the Golden Hind is that we don’t know what it looked like, so having plain wood internal bulkheads is certainly possible.

ghb15.jpg

Then I turned my attention to the main deck. The principal issue here is that Airfix have moulded hatches on each of the four levels. I think that gratings would have been much more likely on at least the lower three decks, to allow light and air to the decks below. I obtained these plastic gratings from HiS Model in the Czech Republic (they stock lots of useful accessories for ship models and you’ll find a link to their website at the end of this article), and I think they will just about work in 1/72.

ghb8.jpg

I cut out the existing hatches, leaving the coamings intact and the front hatches, which I imagine would have given access to a ladder leading to the deck below.

ghb7.jpg

I then inserted the three gratings, using a little sprue goo to fill some small gaps at the edges.

ghb10.jpg

Then I painted the main deck using a similar approach to the hull and internal bulkheads, but using a lighter translucent paint, Vallejo Smoke, to give some visual contrast between the decks and the main structure. I installed the deck in the hull and discovered that it’s rather warped, perhaps due to the age of this particular kit? It took some wrestling and clamping to get it in position.

ghb17.jpg

I added the internal bulkheads to complete the main construction of this first part of the build.

ghb18.jpg

Finally, I added some simple ladders made from strips of plastic card to give access to each deck.

ghb20.jpg

And that’s it for this part of the build. Other than for some minor issues with getting the hull halves to join accurately and getting the warped main deck into position, there was nothing too challenging here. It’s entirely possible that both these issues are due to the fact that this is an old kit that may have been lying around in someone’s attic for the last 25 years – if you buy the more recent Vintage Classics version you may not have these problems.

In the next thrilling instalment, I’ll be working on the hull exterior and adding the stern, head and main deck fittings.

Thanks for reading. If you want to see more detail and pics of this first stage of the build, please see the build log on my blog site:

https://modelkitworld49141446.wordp...9258v-build-review-part-1-hull-and-main-deck/

Links

HiS Model
– in addition to a range of ship kits and accessories, HiS also provide useful information on a range of topics including rigging diagrams on specific ships and advice on things like choosing appropriate blocks and colouring brass cannon.

https://www.hismodel.com/en/

ghb18.jpg
 
Last edited:
Good day,
I like very much bright wood colors You made - it looks very natural!
Ladders from fore and aft superstructures leading to the waist , looks wrong here for me, consider this is potencial fighting area during close combat actions, and there shouldn't be free access from the waist deck area to the fore and aft platforms... there are massive doors correctly shown in the kit and ambrasures for the rifles cutted in the fore and aft bulkheads faced to the waist area which looks right in pkace but not these added extra ladders...
There are many ancient, contsmporary pictures( not modern interpretations) of galleons and non of them have ladders leading to the waist...
 
Last edited:
Good day,
I like very much bright wood colors You made - it looks very natural!
Ladders from fore and aft superstructures leading to the waist , looks wrong here for me, consider this is potencial fighting area during close combat actions, and there shouldn't be free access from the waist deck area to the fore and aft platforms... there are massive doors correctly shown in the kit and ambrasures for the rifles cutted in the fore and aft bulkheads faced to the waist area which looks right in pkace but not these added extra ladders...
There are many ancient, contsmporary pictures( not modern interpretations) of galleons and non of them have ladders leading to the waist...
I'm glad you like the wood effect, and you could be right about the ladders... To me, it just looks wrong not to have easy and rapid access from the main deck to the fore and sterncastles but it's quite possible that I have overdone the number of ladders.
 
Good day,

You are right about easy and rapid access to the fore and aftercastles from main deck, this could be suggested from modern point of vew I could guess :)))

But absence of such ladders on the contemporary galleon pictures could be explained by contrary purpose - to make this eccess as much difficult as posible for enemy boarding team, which was very common tactics in that time of XVI th for Spanish Navy especially, to board enemy vessel after one broad artillery shot and to attempt amborcation enemy vessel and continue fighting on board to get it as prize...

In my signature there is a link to museum site with plenty galleon pictures of Dutch, Spanish and other origins... no these kind of ladders could be seen

From other point of vew, to have such details as ledders on the ship model make it more attractive for vewing...I ve heard that Mayflower II galleon replica had even steering wheel installed instead of whipstaff and ladders as well , during her cross atlantic voyage...so what... :))) this is just our plastic models which we could assemble in any way we prefer with more or less artisric license...
 
I completely agree - we're creating visual illusions that are representations of much larger objects, not necessarily perfect reduced-size versions of the originals. Ultimately, I think that the only thing that really matters is that you are happy with your build, or at the very least, that you learn something from every build...
 
Very nice work so far. Looking forward to see your upcoming progress. I love your technique in making the plastic look like wood. I also like the idea of screwing your stand to the base. Regarding the ladders, the spaces in the upper deck railings, look like ladders are expected. And to me they are esthetically pleasing. One question. Are you using an airbrush or hand painting?
Thanks
John
 
Great work so far. I love what you did to the bulkheads. I wish I had thought of that!

And I agree - HiSmodel have good stuff and the service they give is excellent. My GH is my second ship, and Radimir (at HiSmodel) helped my introduction to rigging by preparing a reduced set of rigging for my first ship model, the Endeavour. (Like you, I am experienced at other plastic models but new to ships.)

Radimir suggested adding a reduced set of running rigging which included :
stays
lifts
clews
braces
sheets
(and vangs)

This was fun and a good intro. The final rigging looks OK except to an expert who will notice the lack of bowlines etc.

Pic-1738.jpg

And I fixed the *way* too long anchor cables after I took the picture :-)

As an intro to rigging, it was perfect. You could consider something similar for your GH? I am hoping to add more rigging on my GH now that I have practiced on the Endeavour.

Here is a pic I made to help me understand the rigging - all the names were new to me! I have many notes and if I can help at all, let me know. (That said, I am near the bottom of the "knowledge ladder" on this forum!)

Pic-1737.jpg


Oh...I decided to use the *plastic* deadeyes and lanyards. They are ugly and I will not be doing that for the GH! But the Endeavour was a step toward better models so I can justify this simplification to myself! I used the Airfix/Heller jig/loom to make the shrouds but I screwed it up pretty badly. The top of the shrouds did not always fit under the top on the mast....I did not know what I was doing at the time! I won't be using that for the GH.
 
Very nice work so far. Looking forward to see your upcoming progress. I love your technique in making the plastic look like wood. I also like the idea of screwing your stand to the base. Regarding the ladders, the spaces in the upper deck railings, look like ladders are expected. And to me they are esthetically pleasing. One question. Are you using an airbrush or hand painting?
Thanks
John
Hi John,

There were no gaps in the balustrades in the internal bulkheads as provided - I added those to work with the ladders. To me, it just looked wrong without ladders, though given that this was a warship and I hadn't considered the need to prevent boarders from being able to move from deck to deck, I may be completely wrong...

Everything here is brush painted. I have considered getting an airbrush, but it would be something that I would have to learn how to use and, my main objection, it would add another layer of technology between me and the model. For the moment, I'll continue using hairy sticks... I'm glad you like the wood effect. It comes from experimentation on other kits (though on aircraft and AFVs there isn't much that's made of wood) to get something that includes a range of colours and tones. IMHO, unpainted wood is never just one colour, and I wanted a technique that reproduced that, though I think I may have overdone it. For the sake of consistency, I plan to continue to use the same technique for the rest of the model, and we'll see how it looks when it's done.

Cheers

Steve
 
Great work so far. I love what you did to the bulkheads. I wish I had thought of that!

And I agree - HiSmodel have good stuff and the service they give is excellent. My GH is my second ship, and Radimir (at HiSmodel) helped my introduction to rigging by preparing a reduced set of rigging for my first ship model, the Endeavour. (Like you, I am experienced at other plastic models but new to ships.)

Radimir suggested adding a reduced set of running rigging which included :
stays
lifts
clews
braces
sheets
(and vangs)

This was fun and a good intro. The final rigging looks OK except to an expert who will notice the lack of bowlines etc.

View attachment 637870

And I fixed the *way* too long anchor cables after I took the picture :-)

As an intro to rigging, it was perfect. You could consider something similar for your GH? I am hoping to add more rigging on my GH now that I have practiced on the Endeavour.

Here is a pic I made to help me understand the rigging - all the names were new to me! I have many notes and if I can help at all, let me know. (That said, I am near the bottom of the "knowledge ladder" on this forum!)

View attachment 637872


Oh...I decided to use the *plastic* deadeyes and lanyards. They are ugly and I will not be doing that for the GH! But the Endeavour was a step toward better models so I can justify this simplification to myself! I used the Airfix/Heller jig/loom to make the shrouds but I screwed it up pretty badly. The top of the shrouds did not always fit under the top on the mast....I did not know what I was doing at the time! I won't be using that for the GH.
Hi,

Thanks for the comments and, for what it's worth, I think your Endeavour looks great - I'd be very happy if the GH ends up looking as good as that...

Rigging is the part of this build I'm most nervous about. The shrouds and ratlines provided here look, to me, horrible, and the simplified deadeyes and lanyards aren't much better. I had always intended to replace the shrouds, ratlines, lanyards and deadeyes with something better, but how it will look when it's done I have no idea. I do intended to go for something that's at least a little simplified in terms of the rigging, but I haven't yet got a firm plan. The GH rigging diagram on the HiS website looks very helpful, but I still don't know a clew from a sheet (and I had never even heard about a vang...).

But hey, that's half the fun of this hobby and one of the reasons I wanted to tackle a sailing ship. I feel that I learn a little with every build, and in this case, the learning curve is going to be steeper than usual.

I look forward to seeing how your build comes together. Reading the early parts of your experiences was an inspiration to me in choosing the Airfix GH as my first sailing ship build and I very much look forward to seeing your progress. I have a feeling you'll get there long before I do...

Cheers

Steve
 
Good day , Steve, John,
Please consider said bellow as kind of joke or mostly rytoric questions Of my "internal dialog with myself"...:
...The only question remains here for me,
not entirely understandable - where we need to stop, depending on our expectations and aesthetic preferences?
Consider situation while we are busy with assembling the model of the vessel, which supposed to be a model of Elizabethian galleon, for example, and how do not finish in the end with creation of some fantastic sailing ship as a result of more and more historical inaccuracies accumulated because of authors preferences or lack of knowledges?
... as an example - these beautiful models, should represent galleons in theory, and they have hull made very close to some of the famous votive models , but for some reason they were rigged in style of much more modern period than supposed to be belongs to Galleon's Golden Age and as results they looks like funny fantasy models than serious museum models ...?
There is very thin line sometimes , by my opinion, between historic accurace and our rich imagination switched on when we are busy with our models, line which could be easily broken up ...
But we are lucky nowdays, there are a lot of information we have presently as a results of many archeological researches and findings of last decades about galleons construction and rigging specifics etc. which are in common public access now...and note, were not in such extends but much more less in the days of Anderson and other classic authors when they wrote their world famous books of ship modelling!..
There are excellent books straight connected to these, galleon questions, I have mentioned at least 3 of them - R.C .Anderson " Rigging in the days of...", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1u9Mx4BgjJCHFg3W_Xc8XHYxupB1LxQr1/view?usp=drivesdk
"Mayflower and other colonial vessels" by Baker
with many technical details approached when they were busy with design and building end of 16th english galleon replica and moreover, there is given a list of all, totally completed list of riging lines with their names and sizes( which could be copied for GH model rigging but need to be scaled proportionaly) - it is very helpfull for galleon rigging understanding when reading together with R.C.Anderson book, You can easily follow description of each rigging line described in Anderson book and see how it was introduced on Mayflower replica!
Very interesting and fastinating process...
and 3rd, most juicy book by my opinion it is "The Galleon The Great Ships of the Armada Era" by Peter Kirsch...it is just great to read it and to watch illustrations!
I have to mention 4th one more book - "Susan Constant 1605 anatomy " by Brian Lavery - very good souce of information about many aspects of galleon ship construction , works well in combination with Baker's book" Mayflower and other colonial..." and RC Anderson book...
Mondfeld gives very good GH rigging plan with bellaying point of riiging lines in his model ship making enciclopedia, this plan later on many times reproduced in various shipmodelling books, and as far as I can see , Radek also using his rigging drawings when he offers various rigging staff in his ship modelling shop...
There is one more very good book , close description of which could be named Dutch style galleon , Ship of Abel Tasman written by Ab Hoving, it would be very interesting, in respect of how to rigg your galleon model, most of the rigging lines are common for England and Europian styles, and a few different , and Hoving gives step by step guide how to rigg vessel ...

TLM_5124ka705_MVUKS.jpg



TLM_4574ka651_MVUKS.jpg
 
Last edited:
There are a few drawings of GH which could be usefull in your building, as I rejember they are from 1970th made by R.Hoeckel and authors... there are much more drawings in this book
And I would like to reccomend one more book to be under hand when rigging galleon model or earlyc17th model - also book written by R. Hoeckel... it is like short condenced version of RC Anderson book, most of all imporrant info regarding rigging in small book " Buolding ship models of 16 -17 th" it is in german, but having google translator under hand it is easy for reading...

Фрегаты _Golden_Hind_1575_1.jpg

Фрегаты _Golden_Hind_1575_2.jpg

Фрегаты _Golden_Hind_1575_3.jpg

Фрегаты _Golden_Hind_1575.jpg

Fregats 16-17 v_0001.jpg

Screenshot_20260920_164104_Drive.jpg
 
While on the topic of warped decks...I had a lot of trouble with the gallery at the rear of the GH. I painted it and assembled it, but then I could not fit it to the hull. I don't know if I made some error somewhere. The pieces are cambered and there is perhaps a lot of room for a few degrees error in joining, and the result was that I could not get it to fit.

I disassembled it and then repaired, as best I could so that the pieces fit. Now the result looks OK until you look carefully...no (scaled) adult could walk around it without hitting their head on the ship!

Pic-1740.jpgPic-1742.jpg

So beware of whatever errors I made!
 
Last edited:
If you are basically going with the kit as it is in the box, then you have a foremast stepped way forward and it comes through the beakhead rather than the forecastle. Most GH models have it going through the forecastle. (The deck from HiSmodel has two versions so you can pick whichever you are using.) There are many galleons from this period showing the mast in both positions...Kirill posted many on my build log. I am going with the Airfix version (beakhead rather than forecastle) because it is different to the later ships (eg Endeavour) so it is more distinctive and it is not clearly wrong :-)
Pic-1741.jpg
 
Good day John,
Im not sure but looking at your pictures - port and sbs railings of balcony need to be cganged place location to each other , or better - all construction including rear panel, need to be just turned upside down( turned around in 180 degree) to fit in proper position and angle to the hull/ rear superstructure...

Pic-1740.jpg

Pic-1745.jpg
 
Good day John,
Im not sure but looking at your pictures - port and sbs railings of balcony need to be cganged place location to each other , or better - all construction including rear panel, need to be just turned upside down( turned around in 180 degree) to fit in proper position and angle to the hull/ rear superstructure...
Maybe. I am fairly sure that I checked the right way up before building it. But...something went wrong! Maybe that is the problem. I am not going to disassemble to check though :-)
 
Good day John,
Im not sure but looking at your pictures - port and sbs railings of balcony need to be cganged place location to each other , or better - all construction including rear panel, need to be just turned upside down( turned around in 180 degree) to fit in proper position and angle to the hull/ rear superstructure...
They only fit together the one way, I think. And it matches the instructions. I dunno what went wrong! I will be more careful on the next Golden Hind!!!
Pic-1745.jpg
 
FM position ,what I saw on the contemporary early galleon pictures , on most of them which we have free access in the net, have FM in front of fwrd bulkhead, looks like in later period , started from 17th begining, it shifted to the forecastle and remains here ...
 
There are a few drawings of GH which could be usefull in your building, as I rejember they are from 1970th made by R.Hoeckel and authors... there are much more drawings in this book
And I would like to reccomend one more book to be under hand when rigging galleon model or earlyc17th model - also book written by R. Hoeckel... it is like short condenced version of RC Anderson book, most of all imporrant info regarding rigging in small book " Buolding ship models of 16 -17 th" it is in german, but having google translator under hand it is easy for reading...

View attachment 638046

View attachment 638047

View attachment 638048

View attachment 638049

View attachment 638051

View attachment 638052
Hi Kirill,

Thank you so much for the links and images - they are really useful. And thanks also for the images of your completed build. It's beyond impressive and I'm not sure if it inspires me to do better, or if it makes me want to take up pottery instead of kit-building because I know I'll never get to that level...

Cheers

Steve
 
While on the topic of warped decks...I had a lot of trouble with the gallery at the rear of the GH. I painted it and assembled it, but then I could not fit it to the hull. I don't know if I made some error somewhere. The pieces are cambered and there is perhaps a lot of room for a few degrees error in joining, and the result was that I could not get it to fit.

I disassembled it and then repaired, as best I could so that the pieces fit. Now the result looks OK until you look carefully...no (scaled) adult could walk around it without hitting their head on the ship!

View attachment 638164View attachment 638165

So beware of whatever errors I made!
Thanks for that. I was aware of potential problems with the gallery after reading other build logs. I appears that in order to fit, the rear part should be curved, but Airfix have supplied it as straight. I haven't got that far yet, but I'm aware that it may take some fettling...
 
Thanks for that. I was aware of potential problems with the gallery after reading other build logs. I appears that in order to fit, the rear part should be curved, but Airfix have supplied it as straight. I haven't got that far yet, but I'm aware that it may take some fettling...
Oh... so others have had this problem?

I hadn't seen that...
 
Back
Top