What Brands Make Higher End Limited Edition/"Museum Quality" Model Kits and How Different Are They from a Standard Kit?

[Model Shipways]

I am currently building your Harriet Lane kit. I am enjoying every minute of it, and learning a lot, despite what I call eruptions of Model Shipways-itis - things that don't match the instructions or pieces that don't exactly fit. I learned how to build wooden boat models from your Shipwright of Old series, and recommend them as often as I can. I owe my enjoyment of my new hobby to you. A question: your instruction manuals all seem to illustrate prototype kits. Do you ever have anyone build a production kit for the instructions? Your customer service is top notch in terms of replacing missing or damaged parts. Is there someone we could correspond with about issues with instructions (there are several in the Pram, Smack and Harriet Lane) or faulty laser cutting (I'm thinking about the cockpit seats in the Lobster Smack and bulkhead 3 in the Harriet Lane)?

Please send me a message at rick@modelexpo-online.com and I'll put you in contact with our master modeler.

 

[Norgale]

Are we related? Ship modeling, military school, American Flyer instead of Lionel,..... anything else??

We are related in Spirit no doubt. You could throw in old cars, landscaping, photography and stirring the pot when things get dull around here. Just sitting in a parking lot near the market entrance on a rainy day with my backup lights on can be fun too.
About "Museum Quality" kits: No kits are MADE for that. The more expensive the kit is, is a guide to the complexity of building it. Whether or not it looks good enough for a Museum is entirely up to you as the builder. An exquisitely built dory is just as likely to end up in a museum as the most beautifully built clipper ship. Practice,practice, practice is the key and keep trying new things. It's always other people who decide what goes in a museum or not.

 

[KevinW]

the majority of kit makers assume the buyer is just wanting to have some fun and is not that interested in accuracy

I think you're spot on there Allan. Outside of our little niche there are many more people building kits out of the box, painting them with the paints and brushes that came with the kit, and enjoying every moment spent doing this. By virtue of being on this forum, we are probably not the primary target group!

 

[Dave Stevens (Lumberyard)]

I think you're spot on there Allan. Outside of our little niche there are many more people building kits out of the box, painting them with the paints and brushes that came with the kit, and enjoying every moment spent doing this. By virtue of being on this forum, we are probably not the primary target group!

so many times i come across the comment of "just having fun" or "just enjoying myself" is what kit makers are picking up on. So if the builders in general do not take model building seriously why should the kits makes? different levels of cost of a kit is to appeal to a bigger range of the market the expensive kits are no better than a cheap kit as far as historical accuracy or quality the kit makes just makes kits bigger and more complex to build.

i do not think better quality of materials add to the value of a model as much as workmanship would.

 

[DAWarden-(Jaager)]

To my eye:
One factor in producing a "quality" model - one that cannot be mitigated by any amount of additional work ---- is using wood species that scale effectively and have the necessary properties.

I have my list of suitable species and also of those species that are just plain trash. All of us with enough experience do. I will resist expounding my list.

 

[Dave Stevens (Lumberyard)]

I have my list of suitable species and also of those species that are just plain trash. All of us with enough experience do. I will resist expounding my list.

as it is said some man's trash is another man's treasure experts suggest the true number of trees likely lies between 70,000 and 80,000 species. So when someone posts you have to use Boxwood for ship modeling because it is the only wood with the necessary properties to work in small detail is just repeating what they heard and the truth is there could be 1,000 types of suitable wood. Yes that is a postage stamp in the corner and the models are not Boxwood or Pearwood or Applewood a wood you can buy by walking into most any store that sells lumber.



So a kit maker who advertises (for more money) you can get Boxwood which most likely is not actually boxwood or pearwood is suggesting a better-quality model or is it just hype?

 

[DARIVS ARCHITECTVS]

I have my list of suitable species and also of those species that are just plain trash. All of us with enough experience do. I will resist expounding my list.

as it is said some man's trash is another man's treasure experts suggest the true number of trees likely lies between 70,000 and 80,000 species. So when someone posts you have to use Boxwood for ship modeling because it is the only wood with the necessary properties to work in small detail is just repeating what they heard and the truth is there could be 1,000 types of suitable wood. Yes that is a postage stamp in the corner and the models are not Boxwood or Pearwood or Applewood a wood you can buy by walking into most any store that sells lumber.

View attachment 643173

So a kit maker who advertises (for more money) you can get Boxwood which most likely is not actually boxwood or pearwood is suggesting a better-quality model or is it just hype?

If they advertise boxwood and substitute it with anything else, it IS false advertisement. If they charge more money for a kit version which has a choice of wood above the quality of their standard kit, AND honestly describe which wood that is, such that you, buyers are properly informed, then the price is justified. And I would probably buy such a kit based on that material as provided, because that's how I roll.

 

[DAWarden-(Jaager)]

If they advertise boxwood and substitute it with anything else, it IS false advertisement.

Perhaps except for Mahogany, it would be difficult to find a name for a wood product more ambiguous than 'boxwood'. The more there is a demand for it, the more species there are that become 'boxwood'. If I could pass the law - only a Buxus could be named 'boxwood'. An ironic factor is that Buxus is more shrub than a tree. The bole is seldom large enough to provide stock that is practical for framing.
It seems that forever - what we have been calling 'boxwood' that is used for framing is actually a Calycophyllum which is a genus of flowering trees and shrubs belonging to the madder or coffee family, Rubiaceae,. most often Calycophyllum multiflorum -Castelo.

If they charge more money for a kit version which has a choice of wood above the quality of their standard kit, AND honestly describe which wood that is, such that you, buyers are properly informed, then the price is justified

In which case - the kit mfg should be required to provide something that they probably have not known themselves up to this time - the true genus and species of the wood that they are supplying.