I think any ship purists should stay away from this scale and opt for a larger one. This kit looks fantastic for this scale.
The detail and attention to build is incredible.
The detail and attention to build is incredible.
Hi , with all due respect to your work but , this drawing does not convince me, Thank you.FrankView attachment 493946According to the original drawings of the enterprise account, the ribs were not spliced in the opposite direction
Hi , with all due respect to your work but , this drawing does not convince me, Thank you.Frank
Hi , I observed with enlargement that the posted drawing depicting the arrangement of the frames reversed from the middle of the hull, I attach your image and others.Thank you.FrankView attachment 493946According to the original drawings of the enterprise account, the ribs were not spliced in the opposite direction
Hi neilm , very much agree on YOUR opinion my point is only for information but since you always dispute here on my information I will get over it.As i said earlier. If you are a purist then go for a bigger model to get more detail. To me, if i could build anywhere near as beautiful as this model, i would be one happy man.
The majority of modellers try to build a nice looking ship and not too worried about museum pieces.
I just love this model.
Hi Frank, no offence meant. I'm sure designers and manufactures love precision information as you have shown. Fair play to you.Hi neilm , very much agree on YOUR opinion my point is only for information but since you always dispute here on my information I will get over it.
Frank
Hi Zoly, it may be, but I don't think I am confused. Never mind, this is a very nice and well made kit. Congratulations on the work.I think Frank were a little confused here,the frames are reveresed at midship in the kit too!!
Hi neilm, I posted what I felt about the topic (real historical documents).Even more confused now. Is there a clearer diagram and explanation. ?
The framing disposition plan may not be for the Enterprise, as it is identified as being for the Medea (1778) and Crescent (1779), both 28-gun sixth rates built at Bristol by Hilhouse. It MAY be the same on Enterprise, as these were in the Enterprise class of ships. High resolution copies of the Medea plan can be purchased from RMG. C ID designation is HIL0079 Lacking better information the drawing for the Medea I would be very comfortable using it for a model of any Enterprise class ship. Construction details can be found in various books such as Goodwin's The Construction and Fitting of the English Man of War. Scantlings of each futtock of each frame can be found in Scantlings of Royal Navy Ships which covers 1719 to early 19th century dimensions. For exact dimensions of all the parts of an Enterprise class 28 gun ship, the original contract I found with a little digging is probably the best source. The paragraphs pertaining to the framing follows. Spelling, etc is as in the original contract.Even more confused now. Is there a clearer diagram and explanation. ?