Hi Stephen
Very good building log.
Very good use of jigs-and construction techniques and I ticked many comments with whole hearted approval.
It’s a good looking working model, crafted!
Model engineer exhibition 1990’s approx. Judging put 1 chap as highly recommended (virtually 99% hand crafted). Gold medal winner used cnc / laser cutter or cam / off the shelf materials etc… says it all. Big discontent and I stopped showing my models + others.
But
The original picture sent in which I saw. Still there on site. Does not tally up.
Yes
There is a protection board and curvy but that was on the seaside. A secondary plank. It does not run inside.
Rivets or ?
Wood panelling? Etc….
As for the term originally questioned - it was answered.
Not going off point : just real-iterating drawings are not like today’s with plasma cutter machines to 1000mm accuracy.
I give another example from my experiences. If interested. Frigate in Portsmouth had rear end damage. We rebuilt to what was there. Surveyor said no and new Cnc/plasma kit arrived. Another crew (hi tec) attached it. Less than a week it was In dry dock and we had to rebuild it. It worked. Drawings fine but ships in water go out of shape. No spirit level please!
My personal view
Original drawing was inaccurate or failed to explain.
Specific boat, specific builder, specific yard… no ship in them days were like a T Ford.
Chapman tried and to large extent worked but … nothing fitted perfect so gapes was introduced for human error. This could not be built into the design.
As many said drawing can only tell you so much but in practice it changed but drawings not updated which survived.
We drew, wrote, stamped on site changes but hardly any was transferred to master copies.
imagine 1000’s + details changed.
Shipwright or docker needed to recognise these changes and understand. No computer or ask for help then… you was adult, professional.
Same old problem at Chatham and everyone has 12 letters after name but none actually held the tools.