Thanks, Tobias. I am very familiar with Ricci's work. His skills exceed mine --- and he is working at 1:36.I am sure you know these pictures and have studied them carefully, this column finish would fit very well.
View attachment 489861
View attachment 489862
Image source @Giampy65
Thanks, Dean. I'm going to resist the urge to add more fancy stuff until I see what the stern will look like. The quarter badge and the stern decorations need to have some consistency to them...I do like the more ornate blocks at the top and bottom of the columns. And the ball at the top could be removed and another added with something floral above it. Just throwing out ideas.
Thanks, Peter. I trust I am not the only one who faces these sorts of challenges. Sometimes something just hits wrong, and it is impossible to ignore.While there is absolutely nothing wrong or dissatisfying with what you have wrought, I can certainly relate to a dissatisfaction arising from the desire to fulfill the concept of the model you envision. I which case I applaud your pursuit of it.
Thanks, Donnie. The boxwood is a joy to work with!Hi Paul,
its been a while since I checked in - your work (craftsmanship) is above my abilities along with you must be using some ultra quality wood and ultra quality tools.
Hi Paul, I don't feel like I'm being dragged anywhere, more accurately I am on a learning journey and get to see some 'out of this world modeling'. Thank you for the ride!I apologize to those following my work for dragging you into the murkier side of my personality and its flaws .
A very nice post Heinrich. You are very kind to stop by and share your encouraging words.I am working through the logs in their order of posting and here I am, Paul! I think the biggest asset of this model is the learning curve that it had demanded from you - it has put you on a fast track to become one of the very best builders of model ships. What makes it so special to me is the natural aptitude you have shown towards acquiring the advanced skillset required to build this model. Kudos, my friend - you are in your element.
Paul, while having a great appreciation for the quality of your work, I'm afraid I have a remark to make to your latest addition. What I perceive are discontinuous lines from the columns to the window sills to the columns, etc, and also the alignment to the other ornaments, including the upper and lower domes, which appear to be slightly off. The upper dome appears to be tilting aft and the top doesn't align with the lines of the hull. This is also more or less applicable to the lower dome.Thanks for the engagement, guys. The visuals are quite tricky. I had another version where the blocks at the top and bottom of the column (I'll call them plinths even though they aren't) were beveled but that looked even worse:
View attachment 489793
I am constrained by the very narrow lip above and below the columns (I did have another version that featured a molded upper and lower plinth but that extended outside/beyond the lip and drew too much attention to itself). I have not tried Dean's suggestion to do the shaping subtractively. Maybe the sides and the tops and the bottoms of the plinth ALL need to be angled?
I have seen only two models (swan class builds) that get this right. At this point I am struggling seeing and producing the geometry at scale...
Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Johan. I totally agree with you with regard to the columns. As for the domes - are you saying they should be more vertical or more skewed? If you mean more skewed, then I still agree with you.Paul, while having a great appreciation for the quality of your work, I'm afraid I have a remark to make to your latest addition. What I perceive are discontinuous lines from the columns to the window sills to the columns, etc, and also the alignment to the other ornaments, including the upper and lower domes, which appear to be slightly off. The upper dome appears to be tilting aft and the top doesn't align with the lines of the hull. This is also more or less applicable to the lower dome.
This would have me mulling it over for a couple of days, before committing to a redo.
My view on the domes is that the axis should be more perpendicular to the upper curves of the hull, so more skewered, in your words. I feel that would esthetically be the most pleasing, but might be historical incorrect.Thanks for sharing your thoughts, Johan. I totally agree with you with regard to the columns. As for the domes - are you saying they should be more vertical or more skewed? If you mean more skewed, then I still agree with you.
correct...but might be historical incorrect.