Actually, here’s another photo from
America’s Privateer which shows more clearly the absence of a jibboom:
View attachment 322650
Compare that to the painting of the original:
View attachment 322651And the model:
View attachment 322652
You can see the extended jibboom in the latter that doesn’t appear on the current ship or in the painting.
Does it mean Panart’s kit is wrong? I don’t think so. Perhaps if we could consult the original admiralty drawings we might find out, but I think it’s safe to say the presence of a jibboom is more than a flight of fancy on Panart’s part. It’s most certainly plausible.
For my part, I tend to blend accuracy with visual appeal in my modeling, and I think the addition of a jibboom on your model definitely adds to the latter. It’s your model so the real question is: do you like it? If the answer is YES, then this whole discussion is quite moot.
Lynx on, Mate. Lynx on.