My 2 cents, joined NRG and MSW, posted a couple of build logs Maine and Constitution, somewhat compulsive about it, with much time invested. Still have the pics, if MSW does come back, will not go back to it though, because I saw and agree with the issues Bob talks about. I had no idea they banned people - just for mentioning or discussing something. Can’t run with folks who do that.
Left NRG because of proposed and implemented rules about “bootleg” kits. How on earth can you pass rules about ownership of property, what a member can buy, or speak about? How would this be enforced? Secondary to this was the motto about better shipbuilding through research - better shipbuilding comes through learning the techniques of craftsmanship, in my opinion - that’s ok to each his own.
Back to MSW, the commercial influence became obvious, so creating an extensive build log, creating deep content, benefits who?
Anyway, happy to be over here, see familiar faces. Not sure about another build log, will at least post finished work. Maybe post pictures of USS Maine build as the subject may be unique.
Finally not having an off site back up of an enormous amount of priceless data, well that speaks for itself.
Have a great day,
-Rich
I get where you’re coming from, but some of the points you raised cut both ways.
Creating a build log doesn’t just “benefit the site” it benefits everyone involved. It helps the builder document their own work and receive praise or support, it helps others learn, and it adds to the collective knowledge of the hobby. That’s true here on SOS, on MSW, on Reddit, or anywhere else people share their work. What do you have to say about SOS literally having PayPal payment links right on the home page. If anything, that seems more 'commercially influenced' than anything MSW was doing. If the logic is “why contribute if it benefits the platform,” then the same question applies to every forum on the internet. By that standard, why even converse with other hobbyists at all.
On the MSW banning issue; I agree that some of the historical bans were questionable, but that’s not the MSW I joined or have seen in the last couple of years. The current moderation has been pretty hands off and consistent. Criticizing past decisions is fair, but painting the entire community with that brush doesn’t match the present reality.
I wasn’t aware the NRG had rules about what members can or can’t own. If there’s a specific rule about that, I’d be interested in seeing it, because that’s a bit concerning. As for their motto; it’s been around since 1948. If the goal was historically accurate modeling, then research naturally had to be part of it. I wouldn’t read too much into the wording.
What I
have noticed here on SOS over the last few days is a lot of negativity directed at MSW and its members. Some posts almost sound celebratory about the loss, which in turn represents the fact that thousands of hobbyists lost years of logs, references, and techniques. That doesn’t really line up with the idea of SOS being a “safe place” or a community that’s above the drama. Pfalzer summed it up well: acting like rival factions in a sport doesn’t help anyone.
Bottom line is nobody here is better than the people who were affected by the MSW crash, and nobody on MSW is better than anyone here. Both communities have strengths and weaknesses. Criticizing bad admin decisions is fair; dismissing an entire community because of them isn’t taking the high road; it’s just mirroring the same behavior people claim to be against.
I expected this to be an information thread and maybe a place where I'd come across some friendly faces I used to chat with over at MSW and I have, however, at this point, this thread seems to have mostly turned into bickering about how bad MSW is and how great SOS is so I'll stop following this thread.
P.S. If anyone has had contact with David Lester from MSW (looks like he has an account here to but I can't message it) it would be nice to get back in touch with him.
Edit: To be clear, this whole thread has at least opened my eyes to some of the previous banning that was done by MSW and I wholeheartedly disagree with it. When it comes back on line, I would hope they would welcome back some of those members should they wish to re-join and I won't have a second thought about defending that 'free speech' and freedom to do with your money as you please.