Oh! For a table of saw, that would ascend.

Joined
Nov 4, 2021
Messages
539
Points
268

Assuming arguendo you were unable to source a Byrnes table saw, would you lean toward a Microlux or a Proxxon (or something else entirely, for that matter)? Has anyone had the opportunity to try and compare both?
 
I was thinking of Byrnes saw before the owner's death. Each time I calculated a total price my eagerness would vanish. I ended up buying a Proxxon FET. Proxxon has very bad fence which requires modifications to work as intended. I did this mod work and now am very happy with it. I learned that to get a proper cut on any table saw you must have: 1) good saw blades. Best ones I use now are not Proxxon. 2) learn table saw cutting techniques; 3) get some experience. All these do not require possession of Byrnes saw.
 
That's great input. I have plenty of experience with full-sized table saws, but now no longer have room for one.
 
I learned that to get a proper cut on any table saw you must have: 1) good saw blades. Best ones I use now are not Proxxon. 2) learn table saw cutting techniques; 3) get some experience. All these do not require possession of Byrnes saw.
I have four table saws: 1) A Harbor Freight piece of junk micro-saw, 2) A King-Seely/Craftsman 8" table saw, 3) A 5hp 10" Delta Unisaw cabinet saw, and 4) a Byrnes Model Machines 4" table saw with the micrometer fence adjustment and the sliding table accessory. I can attest that all you say about using a table saw is accurate. To infer, however, that lower priced table saws will make "a proper cut" as conveniently or consistently within tolerances or be as well-built and long-lasting as a Byrnes saw would not be accurate. A Byrnes saw is accurate to .001" right out of the box without fettling or modifications and it will keep within those tolerances reliably. The Byrnes saw will also be much more powerful and capable of cutting the hard woods, metals, and plastics encountered in modeling ships. The only plastic part on a Byrnes saw is the spud for the sawdust vacuum hose. It's up to the buyer to determine whether the "top shelf" price of a Byrnes saw (or other Model Machines product) is justifiable for their purposes. This is sort of like deciding whether the additional money for a Mercedes-Benz instead of a Chevrolet is worth it to you. Everybody's mileage will vary.
 
It has been said elsewhere on this forum that 90 percent of ship models are built from kits. Good, and some not so good, ship model kits have always been expensive. Today, it’s not unusual for a kit to cost from $500-$1000 and some are priced at $1500.

By comparison, a $800 Byrnes saw is not such a bad buy as it will last a lifetime. I have had mine for over 20 years and it’s still cutting. I have NO purchased accessories other than the $15 thin rip guide purchased from the NRG. Others including a sled I have made myself.

Roger
 
All good info and no argument that Byrnes is best in show, but the entering argument was the assumption that a Byrnes saw is not available. Looking for info on the relative virtues and vices of other benchtop saws
 
In Europe the modelbuilders mostly use the Proxxon. I got the FSK version and I'm happy with it. The Fet seems to be better. But I did some modifications on mine and it does the job. Actualy very accurate after the mod. The FET is better like I said. It also looks that the FSK is sell by Micro-Mark. Just in black plastic not green. It's the same machine.
I'm making this upgrade
and I'm almost done.
 
Not withstanding the shipping costs to Europe and the exact status of the availability of the Byrnes why would anyone purchase something that would require modifications to make it useful.
The one major downfall of the Byrnes in my humble opinion, is the lack of angle cutting ability. Yes, I know there is an angle cutting accessory for the Byrnes however, I find it to be very cumbersome to use.
As one who owns the Byrnes saw with every attachment available including the extended table I wouldn't sell mine if someone offered $10,000 for it. That goes for the three other Byrnes machines which I own. They will certainly outlast my lifetime.
 
purchase something that would require modifications to make it useful.
It is not necessary to do, the saw cuts perfect without. It just takes a little longer to adjust properly. The proxxon and the older fsk/micromark can cut under an angle.
 
cheap plastic construction and not anything near the quality
The housing is plastic, but the saw table and the attachment of the sam, motor and all turning parts are metal. The plastic isn't cheap but strong enough to hold everything. The byrnes is maybe all metal. But the price is to it. When I look to a table saw like Festool, the housing is also plastic.
 
Can anyone point to an information source for the mod that appears to be needed for the Porxxon table saw??
This is what I did.

 
I've been researching these saws for years. The Proxxon FET is a fine saw. The only thing that comes close and yes better is the Byrnes. I'm still struggling with the smaller Proxxon. Its fine for very small parts, very small and balsa. The blades even the carbide tipped from Proxxon don't last, Remember we're cutting hard woods usually. Big difference than pine. Actually if you're not scratch building a band saw would fit the bill just fine. I'm going to get one because the mini table saws that are any good aren't cheap. Anything else Ill use the 8" if I have to. JMO
 
By the way. Guys. This micro-mark model looks exactly as Proxxon FET but had a ripping fence with no seeming problems as Proxxon saw has. Fence looks simple and reliable. Does anyone owns this model? Could they share their opinions about this model. If I did not own a Proxxon FET I would probably took a risk buying this saw. Today it is also much less expensive to Proxxon.

Do not forget the Proxxon FET and this model of micro-mark saw they have tilting saw feature which Byrnes do not have. ;)

Yeah, yeah, I know Byrnes has some expensive attachment to do tilted cuts.

 
By the way. Guys. This micro-mark model looks exactly as Proxxon FET but had a ripping fence with no seeming problems as Proxxon saw has. Fence looks simple and reliable. Does anyone owns this model? Could they share their opinions about this model. If I did not own a Proxxon FET I would probably took a risk buying this saw. Today it is also much less expensive to Proxxon.

Do not forget the Proxxon FET and this model of micro-mark saw they have tilting saw feature which Byrnes do not have. ;)

Yeah, yeah, I know Byrnes has some expensive attachment to do tilted cuts.


G'day YT, I had the Proxon Version which is Identical, great saw, when I bought the proxxon saw I went to Micro Marc and also bought the this fence for it,


accuriser-ii-671743.jpg

This fence locks at both ends and has a sliding scale to allow to adjust for the widths of cuts, The saw has I said is identical to the Proxxon ,

hope this helps you,

best regards John.
 
G'day YT, I had the Proxon Version which is Identical,
Thanks, neptune. This fence is "temporarily out of stock" at micro-mark site which normally means forever. Can you clarify? Do you own a Proxxon FET or a Micro-Mark which looks like ProxxoneFet?
 
For any of the Aussie builders here is a great starter package, I have the table saw, AUD 299 plus shipping,


minitablesawmain_533x.webp

and I am very happy with it,

but they also have a combo deal, for AUD 350, plus shipping,


https://www.ausee.com.au/products/h...saw-bundle?_pos=1&_psq=table+saw&_ss=e&_v=1.0


table_saw_and_scroll_saw_bundle_533x.webp
 
Thanks, neptune. This fence is "temporarily out of stock" at micro-mark site which normally means forever. Can you clarify? Do you own a Proxxon FET or a Micro-Mark which looks like ProxxoneFet?

I did have a Proxxon exactly like the Micro Mark one which has the variable speed control,

best regards John,
 
Back
Top