![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE MARCH/APRIL 2026 |
![]() |
![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
Here's a few places you might look:Not sure what to do about the bowsprit position! out of the box build or modify, can't find a whole lot about modifying the kit. I bought myself a book hope it helps![]()
I'm interested in the problems you had ? care to share?I will be interested to see how you solve some of the difficulties I had.
Paul Thanks for adding my log hereHere's a few places you might look:
HMS Sovereign of the Seas - Bashing DeAgostini Beyond Believable Boundaries
HMS Sovereign of the Seas - Bashing DeAgostini Beyond Believable Boundaries - by DARIVS ARCHITECTVS Well, I just finished La Couronne and its display case a few hours ago, and swore that I would take a break before starting another project. That didn't happen. On to Ship #2. Research on...shipsofscale.com
Sovereign of the Seas - Sergal 1:78 (with hopefully many added details)
Hi Everyone, I have wanted to build this kit for a longtime; I will “attempt” to super detail this project beyond the “out of the box” kit – as excellent as it is. I have the McKay book (filled with excellent line drawings and images; it will be an excellent guide, along with stunning museum...shipsofscale.com
17th Century Ship Design and the Sovereign of the Seas (1637)
Hi All, I am going to start posting about 17th century ship design and the Sovereign of the Seas (1637). I hope you’ll find it interesting. Although the focus will be on the Sovereign, there will be a lot of material on how ships of its time were designed. This might interest folks who aren’t...shipsofscale.com
There are others on the forum, but these might be of interest to you.
I will also follow along - PS: I did some detailings with bowsprit - The kit really misses here IMO.Not sure what to do about the bowsprit position! out of the box build or modify, can't find a whole lot about modifying the kit. I bought myself a book hope it helps
View attachment 613794
Couldn't resist making a start
View attachment 613795View attachment 613796View attachment 613797
???PS; Big YES on your blocks and ropesAfternoon guys, just finished getting the model room ready for the SoS this will be another long build diary hope you can pull up a chair.
View attachment 613783View attachment 613784View attachment 613785View attachment 613786View attachment 613787View attachment 613788View attachment 613789View attachment 613790View attachment 613791View attachment 613792
Hi Brian,Afternoon guys, just finished getting the model room ready for the SoS this will be another long build diary hope you can pull up a chair.
View attachment 613783View attachment 613784View attachment 613785View attachment 613786View attachment 613787View attachment 613788View attachment 613789View attachment 613790View attachment 613791View attachment 613792
Never mind, found it!Following along! Now tell me more about that framing jig! Is that custom or commercially available?
Yep mine is in the front row Brian. Another monster build to gleefully watch. Cheers Granthope you can pull up a chair.
I take a humble backbenchYep mine is in the front row Brian. Another monster build to gleefully watch. Cheers Grant












The Royal Navy began transitioning to the widespread use of belaying pins in the early 18th century, with pinrails fully adopted by the mid-1700s. Before this era, sailors tied off their running rigging using cleats, fixed bitts, and rails.Seeing belaying pins in the kit is a surprise and may give pause.![]()
You are correct Brian,She would not have had belaying pins. Same issue with the hearts which appear to be for the stays. She would not have had any of these, but rather there would be deadeyes.she was built in 1637 and wouldn't have used them is this correct?



