- Joined
- Dec 3, 2025
- Messages
- 13
- Points
- 48

![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE MARCH/APRIL 2026 |
![]() |


It's hard to pinpoint what the production was really based on. Personally, i would have made gallery more massive. Fortunately, there's a way to compare it, both to Allan plan and to the film prop. Vanguard models aft gallery is much better adapted.If you compare the side gallery roofs with a free download from the NMM draft, AL haven't got the shape correct, it's too 'domed'. Also the scalloped roof covering is too heavy. I would have to bash these, they are too obvious to the eye. Without the roof covering the shape might look a bit nearer to how it should be? I'd like to hear your conclusion on this when it comes to that part of the build.
Chris Watton got it right (of course) The Chinese kits have done pretty well. Why can't AL get it accurate? At over a thousand pounds I'd expect perfection.



You are welcome, it is my pleasure to help. There are also drawings signed by John Marshall of her deck plans that you may find helpful in comparing with AL's version (which hopefully are the same) RMG is a great source of both design and as-built plans for thousands of ships, including captures like the French ship Unité which was renamed Surprise. If there is any doubt that this was a French capture. not an English built ship, the shape of the body plan above is a dead giveaway.Thx Bob, I'll keep this one in mind when i get to that part.


Curious what you're writing. At the time of AL publication, i was certain they were releasing a french version of L'unite instead of Surprise. So muchso that, i specifically mentioned to a friend that it would definitely be l'unite model.I once bought the plans for the shtandart, the tsar's yacht from the RMG, they are superb. Checked out the site found the quarter and forecastle plan and the lines and profiles but i did not find the one above for the original l'unité - I also keep the belle poule from ancre near as that one is also an original french vessel that ended up in english service.



Hi Kuba, the belle poule you are building is the old one I believe, the plans i have is for the french napoleonic frigate that was captured by the british https://everything.explained.today/French_frigate_Belle_Poule_(1766)/ . It was my first one i bought from Ancre, ages ago.Curious what you're writing. At the time of AL publication, i was certain they were releasing a french version of L'unite instead of Surprise. So muchso that, i specifically mentioned to a friend that it would definitely be l'unite model.
It's hard to say to what extent British adapted this rigging after taking over the ship, but modeling it to La Belle Poule could be a great solution. I'd love to see how you handle this ship on Ancre plans, as i'm currently in the process of building La Belle Poule also myself.


They do give good service and up to now i always like building their ships, most model kits are not always super accurate that is true, but they are great in getting people interested in the hobby .As long as they have a market for their kits as they are, why would they invest their own company money in making them high quality?
Allan
Hi Kuba, the belle poule you are building is the old one I believe, the plans i have is for the french napoleonic frigate that was captured by the british https://everything.explained.today/French_frigate_Belle_Poule_(1766)/ . It was my first one i bought from Ancre, ages ago.
View attachment 591985

No Allen, this is their all new kit.As long as they have a market for their kits as they are, why would they invest their own company money in making them high quality?
Allan



AL may not have obtained authorization to use NMM's drawings, or perhaps never intended to do it seriously. Good news is that Mr. Passaro certainly won't condemn AL's kit, because it poses no commercial threat, comparing to some premium Chinese brand.No Allen, this is their all new kit.
With their new kits being made in China, and the replacement of the old poor quality Surprise this new one is supposed to be a prestige offering!? They've obviously put a lot of money and effort into it but just don't seem to be able to pin it? They've tried....and failed!

MSW's initial investigation into Chinese copies was based on thhe availability of a Lady Nelson kit. Since this never existed in reality and could only have been copied off Chris Watton's design (basically Sherborne renamed for Amati to avoid confusion with Caldercraft's/Chris' Sherborne) it's clearly pirated. But what none of us know is how many kits are produced without paying their dues? NMM has no idea but considers it to be a considerable 'wedge'! What of all the Euro' kits, The Mamolis, the Corels, etc? I know that Caldercraft is fully paid up, also Amati I think. NMM say it would take a lot of time to investigate and don't consider it to be worth the effort. Some kits we know are bona fide, and some Chinese are also bona fide. So is a blanket ban on Chinese kits justifiable?AL may not have obtained authorization to use NMM's drawings, or perhaps never intended to do it seriously. Good news is that Mr. Passaro certainly won't condemn AL's kit, because it poses no commercial threat, comparing to some premium Chinese brand.

