• Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.
  • PRE-ORDER SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!

    The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
    Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.

    NOTE THAT OUR FIRST ISSUE WILL BE JAN/FEB 2026

CAF Granado 1/48 PoF Bomb Vessel by Signet

I build the quarterdeck bulkhead as shown in the plans, but use thinner and smaller material for the vertical pieces. The decals went on fine, but are quite glossy. A few coats of Vallejo Mecha Matt Varnish dulled them down quite a bit. The outlines are still visible in this photo, but not so much in real life:
1767556520354.png
Even though I used Micro-Sol, I couldn't get the decals to meld into the planking. The half-doors to the cabin accommodation will be added on later and left open (but not hinged).

I've done the stern decoration at the wales line differently than the instructions show. The instructions show:
1767556934605.png
My problems were 1) I have been unable to produce the complex sections using the razor scrapers supplied, and 2) I felt unable to bend the 3x4 strip in 2 dimensions and glue it in place.

I bought some 1mm x 2mm double half round brass strip that I will use for the fancy section. I then cut a 2x5mm strip to use to replace the 3x4, and tapered it all sides to fit better. The little almost-triangular platforms that go on either side would be glued to this strip to assist in locating, gluing and securing the assembly.

Since the brass strip would be added later, the triangles needed to be larger. Here one's glued to the modified 2x5 strip:
1767557179381.png
I ended up remaking these triangles to be smaller later, but the procedure is the same.
1767557453556.png

With a triangle at each end, rubber bands can pull the strip and triangles into place for gluing.
1767557249339.png
The other clamps are to hold everything vertically.
1767557326983.png

This ends up a pretty secure assembly, ready for adding other decoration:
1767557543222.png

Speaking of other decoration, I haven't decided when to add this, but it's easier to paint off of the model:
1767557652068.png
If you think it doesn't look very good (as I do as well), you're sitting too close to your computer screen.

To be continued.....
 
Tom at CAF said he'd have a solution for me in a bit, so I'm going to continue with the rest of the build in the meantime.

I decided to work on the Belfry. The small brass bell included is nice, but the piece included for the ringer (?), uh, isn't. It didn't really work as a ringer, or support, or anything, really, so I used a ring and nail instead:
View attachment 568296
A is the included "ringer". B are the rings and C are the nails, put together to make a ringer and bell support D.

The result is much better, and looks pretty good from the side, where you can't see the ring:
View attachment 568297

I then mounted the bell onto the bell pivot (the extension of the ring acts as a lever), and assembled it with the top:
View attachment 568300
The bell pivot actually "rings", using small nails as a pivot. I used a temporary spacer at the bottom to keep the vertical arms parallel. I also placed shims under each arm to center the top piece , which is wider, then weighted it while glue dried. BTW, the two vertical arms are different length because one side will sit on the main deck, while the other will extend through the deck structure to the beam below.
View attachment 568298
I was concerned it would be too flimsy, but ended up fairly strong, if not manhandled. I dropped it a couple times, of course, but it survived.

I then checked the fit in the required location, and found a problem:
View attachment 568302
There isn't room for the belfry to fit between the foredeck and the windlass shaft. Okay, what have I done wrong now? I knew from doing the foredeck planking that it was a bit long, compared to the plans, but it was all based on the windlass support, so still should have been okay for the belfry.

Taking the plans, I determined that they do indeed indicate an problem interference at this location:
View attachment 568305
In blue is the belfry uprights, red is the windlass shaft (rotated to its maximum width) and magenta is the interference. Same in below:
View attachment 568307

So, I checked out Goodwin's side cross section:
View attachment 568308
It appears that the windlass should have been further aft, or the foredeck further forward, creating clearance rather than interference.

I decided to fix the problem by moving the belfry forward into the foredeck by notching the uprights to clear the foredeck cross beam and deck:
View attachment 568310
This isn't realistic, of course, because this would severely weaken the uprights, and we wouldn't want to cut into the crossbeam. But it should look okay, and be far preferred to rebuilding everything.

After mounting the belfry as well as the windlass assembly, we have:
View attachment 568311
And while there is very little clearance between the windlass shaft and the belfry uprights, there is at least some:
View attachment 568312
View attachment 568313

I'll end this chapter here, and begin a new post.
Smart recovery here!
 
Hello ,The kit includes two fasteners for the bottom of the masts, one for the main mast and the other for the mizzen mast. If you still want to try this installation plan, I can mail you another set of these parts。
Hi Tom, its me Daniel. I just sent you a PM. I hope you got it. I will be looking for your PM answer
Cheers
DANIEL

HI Signet

Sorry about this posting.

I keep trying to communicate with Tom by PM and every time his address at the bottom of the PM has a line over it. I am not sure what that means. So I just wrote a new PM and quoted his post with the aim to check if he got my PM. My aim is to have a private personal chat with Tom, that's all.

Nevertheless, if you want, I can delet this posting.

Thanks
Daniel
 
Back
Top