Thank you very much, Christian!Happy birthday, Sergey

**VIEW THREAD HERE** |
Thank you very much, Christian!Happy birthday, Sergey
Дякую!!! Allan.
You are right! But in the kit the manufacturer made it so that most of the beams do not fall on the frames and according to the city then they are fixed to the air. If you miss this point and trust the anatomy (in the image on the left), then you can see that the beams lie directly on the load board with their entire beveled plane. And here either the author of the anatomy is mistaken or on small ships on the deck above the hold it was possible. I understand that this is not logical ... but based on the fact that not all beams fall on the frames, the logic in fastening to the load board does not seem so wrong. Since the load board is 2-3 times thicker than usual, what could withstand the beams of the deck above the hold, where there were no guns or cargo, as on a cargo ship.That's a good point. Leaving a gap between the omitted celing and some of the inner structures, as knees or floor timbers, is absolutely right, but not (IMHO...) between beames and frames.
Antscherl's Hoy practicum seems to suggest they were rather mortised into the spirkettings and bolted directly to the main frame.
View attachment 523884
View attachment 523885
View attachment 523887
You are right! But in the kit the manufacturer made it so that most of the beams do not fall on the frames and according to the city then they are fixed to the air. If you miss this point and trust the anatomy (in the image on the left), then you can see that the beams lie directly on the load board with their entire beveled plane. And here either the author of the anatomy is mistaken or on small ships on the deck above the hold it was possible. I understand that this is not logical ... but based on the fact that not all beams fall on the frames, the logic in fastening to the load board does not seem so wrong. Since the load board is 2-3 times thicker than usual, what could withstand the beams of the deck above the hold, where there were no guns or cargo, as on a cargo ship.
Sorry, now I got it. In that case you are totally right. Anyway I agree no real shipwright of the XVIII century could be so dumb to nail a beam right into the celling alone. Smart recovery, though! Cheers
Good evening Sergey. Firstly a big happy birthday for yesterday. I hope you had a wonderful day.Friends, I am grateful to all of you for your congratulations!
I am very pleased with all your words and wishes.
And all of you are good, peace, health to you and your loved one!
Well, we continue the lower deck.
There is inconsistency and contradiction in anatomy.
View attachment 523870
In one plan, the beam of the lower deck lies on the board, and in the background there is a bar that is interrupted (purple). I tried to study the question. And by all standards, beams should come into contact with frames, but not in all cases! At very lower levels in small and medium-sized ships, where the angle of the frame at such an angle that it tends to horizontal, the beams could lie directly on the power boards of the inner skin.
In Alerta, this can be applied to the rear beams on the lower deck (where the powder magazine was). This level is slightly below the main level of the lower deck.
But on the main part of the lower deck, a little different. Since the frame also has a corner with a frame that is not vertical, the entire beam is wide enough to interrupt the skin boards so that we make the side more fragile. Therefore, it is more logical that only part of the beam lies on the frame (and a small board is interrupted. In this case, this is shown in the right plan, purple board). And part of the beams lay on the upper power board. Thus, beams touched the frames, but did not greatly interrupt the power boards.
That's why I did it.
View attachment 523871
On the lower level of the lower deck, I made a small gap between the beam and the frame, simulating the location under the beam of the board.
View attachment 523872
View attachment 523873
And on the upper level of the lower deck - it will be a little different, but more on that later. In the meantime, what it looks like.
View attachment 523874
To glue the transverse beams, you need to make suitable grooves and use a ruler to glue them at an angle of 90 degrees.
View attachment 523875
Then I tried everything on in place and clipped to the length I needed.
View attachment 523876
At the inspection, Nelson said that everything is ok
View attachment 523877
Without glue, I tried everything together.
View attachment 523878
By the way, how the perpendicularity and parallelism of beams is created, everything is simple.
View attachment 523879
And here's another fragment without glue is approximate in place.
View attachment 523880
As you can see, beams do not reach the frames as a whole, but I did this to simplify the fit. Only the upper part will be visible and will be in the air (there should be a board). And the area that should touch the frame will be closed by an interrupted board (bar, which is purple in the diagram).
I don't know if this was possible, most likely not (I haven't seen this in anatomies), I'm talking about the fact that beams did not coincide with frames. That is, beams should not logically be in the space between the frames, but in the kit so. I do this because I do not want to deal with fixing all this, it will take a lot of time. But if so, then this is a big miscalculation of the manufacturer, but as it is. continue on.
View attachment 523881
...
But unfortunately I can't say for sure that my version is reliable, but logically and in my opinion it is quite possible. I have already done so and there is no way backSorry, now I got it. In that case you are totally right. Anyway I agree no real shipwright of the XVIII century could be so dumb to nail a beam right into the celling alone. Smart recovery, though! Cheers
Thanks a lot, BillHappy birthday Sergey!
Bill
Thanks for the congratulations, Great! Yes, it was a great day. And thanks for the praise of my review. I hope I am doing everything right and not misinforming anyone, but I try to make the work at least beautiful.Good evening Sergey. Firstly a big happy birthday for yesterday. I hope you had a wonderful day.
Wow. What brilliant modelling. Thank you so much for sharing in detail your process. I am going to go back and re read some sections- I love the way you sand and polish the wood it gives a wonderful finish. Cheers Grant
Thank you for your congratulations and your assessment of my review.Happy belated birthday! Your build is looking very good!
Thank you very much for the congratulations and kind words about my build. Most likely my answer got lost. To your question, how long have I been working on the ship, and you can read it at this link.Hello Sergey.
Firstly, happy birthday yesterday. I hope you had a great day and were able to enjoy it with your loved ones.
Your model is really beautiful and the way you worked the wood is world class. May I ask how long you spend on your model each day? What a brilliant model! I really like the way you build and explain things to us. I can only learn from you.
I'm always happy to see your progress.
Best regards
Günther![]()
Dziękuję bardzo za gratulacje, Mirek!Witaj
Wszystkiego najlepszego Sergey spóźnione ale szczere życzenia urodzinowe. Pozdrawiam Mirek
She's coming along so nicely. I like your "faux nailing work" as well. I read that some fear the moment you would go with oil or other finishing treatment, but in that case, untill the moment you won't be able to reach the hold due to the upper structures, you can dye nail heads in black. Cheers!... continuation of the previous post, some macro and beautiful angles...
View attachment 524627
View attachment 524628
View attachment 524629
View attachment 524630
View attachment 524631
View attachment 524632
View attachment 524633
View attachment 524634
View attachment 524635
View attachment 524636
View attachment 524637
View attachment 524638
View attachment 524639
View attachment 524640
View attachment 524641
On this I would like to say that with the lower deck everything... but there are still two stairs left... I have already started doing them, I will show the result soon...
![]()