- Joined
- Nov 13, 2025
- Messages
- 157
- Points
- 113

Three related thoughts:
1) Is the problem here actually about kit vs scratch, or is it about some posts being really condescending? I mean, maybe it's just me, but maybe the "special olympics" comments and the like are off-putting? There's certainly space for critique, but there are ways to be critical without being rude.
2) The way some write about the supposed "kit vs scratch divide" makes no sense to me. I have no idea where these ideas come from. To quote a recent post, "Somebody builds an indisputably uninteresting kit model and everybody is supposed to fawn all over them with complements." What are you talking about? Seriously, it's like making something up to get mad at. At most, I suppose that many builds get a number of friendly but generic "nice work!" comments, but I'm baffled by the idea that that's devaluing the art of modeling or something. If the only comments people posted on all but the most impressive builds were "meh, your work is mediocre, try harder," I think that very few people would want to post at all. (And if your perspective is that only "high quality" builds matter: some portion of those builders will eventually become very skilled scratch-builders). There's also a lot of comments suggesting some sort of conspiracy to devalue scratch building, which I haven't seen the slightest evidence for.
3) I think the best way to shape the direction of ship modeling is by posting and supporting the types of builds you want to see more of, rather than writing about how the unwashed masses are doing it wrong. I suppose one can try to brand oneself a "prickly truth-teller," but at the end of the day, I'd rather be branded "makes interesting builds" or "friendly and helpful."
1) Is the problem here actually about kit vs scratch, or is it about some posts being really condescending? I mean, maybe it's just me, but maybe the "special olympics" comments and the like are off-putting? There's certainly space for critique, but there are ways to be critical without being rude.
2) The way some write about the supposed "kit vs scratch divide" makes no sense to me. I have no idea where these ideas come from. To quote a recent post, "Somebody builds an indisputably uninteresting kit model and everybody is supposed to fawn all over them with complements." What are you talking about? Seriously, it's like making something up to get mad at. At most, I suppose that many builds get a number of friendly but generic "nice work!" comments, but I'm baffled by the idea that that's devaluing the art of modeling or something. If the only comments people posted on all but the most impressive builds were "meh, your work is mediocre, try harder," I think that very few people would want to post at all. (And if your perspective is that only "high quality" builds matter: some portion of those builders will eventually become very skilled scratch-builders). There's also a lot of comments suggesting some sort of conspiracy to devalue scratch building, which I haven't seen the slightest evidence for.
3) I think the best way to shape the direction of ship modeling is by posting and supporting the types of builds you want to see more of, rather than writing about how the unwashed masses are doing it wrong. I suppose one can try to brand oneself a "prickly truth-teller," but at the end of the day, I'd rather be branded "makes interesting builds" or "friendly and helpful."


