• Ships of Scale has incorportated an extra level of security when you log In. Please follow on-screen prompts to acknowledge that you are not a robot via a "Check Box" or a "Pictorial Check Box Puzzle". This is needed due to higher level of AI Activity Security.
  • SUBSCRIBE TO SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!

    The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
    Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.

    NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE July/August 2026
  • Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.

Soleil Royal by Heller - an Extensive Modification and Partial Scratch-Build by Hubac’s Historian

Thinking back to WojtasS’s question about what to model next, I remembered this model of a hoy that exists in the NMM colkections:

View attachment 640285

This is such a lovely little ship. I may be wrong, but doesn’t this exist in kit form from some manufacturer?
Looks like a fun little ship to make. It's just a matter do you want that exact model or only type of vessel. From what I see those from Paul's link is different

 
I see that Drydock offers a nice kit of the Hayling Hoy:


I do, however like the particular sheer and half oval ports of the NMM model. Anyway, food for thought.

And, yes Chris, I am a fan of L’Amarant. There’s a beautiful German build from the monograph, out on the web.
 
greetings...just taking a quick peek at your miracle build, then running away, cause it's just too painful for me to watch....simply amazing is all i can say....cheers to you always.....
 
I have to say that I’ve really enjoyed myself the past two weeks. I’ve managed to turn-out all of the yard arms, with the exception of the fore and main t’gallant yards. I was hoping to recover those yards from off-cuts of the topmast and t’gallant mast fabrication. I also roughed out the main topmast, and this has me really excited!

Here are the yard arms. From left to right, you have the sprit-mast through the mizzen mast:

IMG_1497.jpeg

As with everything, I got better and faster at this, as I went. The third yard from the left is the fore topmast yard. I was a little over-zealous in my initial planing of the central octagonal flats, and I removed too much material on one flat. As I will paint these yards black, I decided to recover the piece with a little BONDO. The repair isn’t perfect, but it’s good enough and I can conceal it aft, and facing toward the deck. I don’t have a lot of this clear cherry, and I didn’t want to waste any.

Along those lines, the mizzen lateen yard is a little ovoid, in cross-section, for the middle third of the yard. Otherwise, though, the yard has no shadow-revealing hollows or bumps, so I decided to keep it. Again, I can orient the yard in a way that displays its correct maximum breadth.

The scaling of the upper masts is a direct take-off from the St. Philippe 1:48 plan-set, which I have reduced by 50% to 1:96. If I were a math-brain, I would not be impressed at all that the actual 1:48 length of topmast (17”), reduces perfectly to 8 1/2”, at 1:96. It does, naturally, and there is something magical about that to me. Perhaps it is because I can actually understand the simple math in my head :)

I honestly can’t remember whether I lengthened the lower main mast section, above the main deck, by 1/2” or 3/4”. The overall objective was to make it plausible for the topmasts to be lowered through the main tops and removed. As Heller has designed this kit, that is not remotely possible. Weirdly, the Heller fore topmast is a solid 1/16” LONGER than the main topmast. At scale, the Heller main topmast is 7/8” (7 scale feet!) longer than that of the SP. It actually works out perfectly that the 8 1/2” SP topmast can be perfectly maneuvered around the main bitts.

Anyway, it was fun to rough out the topmast, and in the pictures below, you can begin to get a sense of the overall height of the model. Keep in mind, that part of my calculations for the mast height factored-in the shorter than Heller t’gallant masts. Significantly shorter.

IMG_1495.jpeg
IMG_1496.jpeg
IMG_1498.jpeg
IMG_1499.jpeg

The net result of widening the lower fore and main tops, as well as shortening the fore and main topmasts to plausibly workable dimensions, will be a visually credible spread of the topmast shrouds. As Heller has modeled it - it is nearly a vertical climb.

Anyway, little by little, we are getting there! Thank you for your interest and for stopping by.
 
Back
Top