Erebus is much like cars of today - it's a 're-badged' Terror kit!

![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR FIRST ISSUE WILL BE JAN/FEB 2026 |
![]() |

Kuba91nt, I'm not sure if you're asking about differences from the actual ship to the model or in the build instructions. If it's the first my answer is, yes there are plenty as ones an actual working ship and the other is just a model. If it's the latter, I would say yes, but I'm just adding together everything I can find and doing the best that I can. As this is my first ship model build I can't really compare but so far I'm quite pleased with everything.
Thanks for the question, I hope this helps.

I am curious.....what details can't we discuss?These are the details we're not allowed to discuss...
To what extent was the ship actually adapted for the expedition?I am curious.....what details can't we discuss?
Thanks
Allan



They is much speculative documentation regarding the modifications to Erebus and Terror. But Erebus has less online than Terror.To what extent was the ship actually adapted for the expedition?
Documentation includes information that the upper deck received additional transverse reinforcement and insulation between it. This is included on the ship's occre, but it's not visible on the wreck.
The same applies to reinforcements, which are not recorded in the documents. It's possible that the workers added additional beams "on their own," without any documentation, which was not uncommon at the time.
I recommend delving deeper into the history of the ship and the falsification of documents by the Admiralty. This was too exclusive an expedition, it had to succeed.
The ship sank, but the documents remained...



They is much speculative documentation regarding the modifications to Erebus and Terror. But Erebus has less online than Terror.
Prior to the ill fated voyage, both ships had extensive remodeling for the stern/rudder area to accommodate the new retractable propeller. The decks were re re-enforced originally ( as these were "bomb" ships with heavy mortars on deck., but double planked prior to the voyage. The ship was a bomb vessel, with an extremely strong hull, built to withstand the impact of explosions. Iron plating was added fore and aft* on the ships' hulls to make them more resistant to pack ice, and their decks were cross-planked to distribute impact forces. For the Franklin Expedition, water tight bulkheads were installed, and a double lining of copper sheathing was fitted around the keel. ( if you have watched the Parks Canada footage, some details of the decking can be seen on Erebus )
In Scott Cookmans book, ICE BLINK, ( Really great book to read) he refers to Barrow and mandating other modifications. These included: " the ships sides which were 3" of English oak, were doubled with two layers of African oak, each 1 1/2 inches thick wrought diagonally against each other. In turn this weas overlayed with with two layers of Canadian elm, each 2 inches thick, again wrought diagonally.
By the way, the Terror OcCre kit did not include the stern water closets and curved davits as confirmed bt the underwater photos of Terror.( I fabricated those and added to my build)
Some remaining questions are: did the iron plating extend along the sides just below the ice channel? Were all hatches "doubled" Did Terror have 9 ships boats or 6.
Matthew Betts book, THE TERROR gives much good building information.
Haul away matey, I'm anxious to see the new Terror builds



Buenos días, negativo, el revestimiento de cobre en estos casos, Erebus y Terror se retiraron por ser necesario debido a las bajas temperaturas de las aguas por las que navegarían, el forrado solo es para aguas cálidas donde prolifera la broma. Aconsejo seguir o por lo menos leer el hilo de MattEn 1845, los cascos del Erebus y del Terror fueron pintados de negro con una franja blanca continua a lo largo del exterior, y los baluartes interiores fueron pintados de amarillo
Pinturas y bocetos contemporáneos de la época de la expedición, como los de Owen Stanley, confirman estos colores.
La parte submarina del casco habría estado cubierta con un revestimiento de cobre,
- Casco: Negro
- Revestimiento: Una sola franja blanca a lo largo de la cubierta del casco (la parte del barco por encima de la línea de flotación) que se extendía alrededor de la proa y subía por las cuadernas exteriores de popa. Los canales de hielo se muestran en muchas ilustraciones como blancos.
- Baluartes interiores: amarillo.
- La ilustración del kit Erebus OcCre muestra colores inexactos, consulte la foto adjunta.
View attachment 563733
modelshipworld.com










"Wallet Bashing" - A very realistic statement. My 'mind- wandering' the other day brought me to comparing prices thru the last half century:- in 1972 I bought a new Triumph Toledo for £945 - in 2001 a new Saab 9-3 cost me with p/ex £10k - in 2022 I sold it for £800, then in 2025 I bought Caldercraft's HMS Victory £951.01. It's sad mind boggling, what inflation does - it blows everything out of proportion. Look what happened to the Deutschmark after 1918!Not agree.
Kit bashing was when the company massively banned people for making unfavorable comments about this situation, and they still do. Now it's wallet bashing at best.

I've tried to suggest to OcCre that they use a poly based plastic small parts box instead of the fragile acrylic ones they insist on using. Maybe, one day when they realize the error of their ways, they'll condescend to change. Even packed & sealed in ziplock bags (as per Caldercraft kits).
My decision to order from Occre turned out to be a good one. They were very easy and actually quick to deal with. Given the fact that they’re in Spain and I’m not it worked out well. That is except for the shipping. Sure there were import charges and two week delivery’s. Both boxes (Terror and Erebus) arrived full of the scattered contents of the tiny parts that were once inside of the plastic parts container. A real mess. The smallest pieces I’ve ever seen all over. Hundreds of them. I knew it was bad so I took a couple jpgs and sent them to Occre. I asked for new parts and they showed up in two weeks. Along with new import charges, but I have to give Occre credit. They stood up and fixed it. Not too many company’s do that any more. In hindsight, I don’t think tiny parts should be shipped in plastic above 30,000 feet.
The online videos don’t match up with the instructions, but once you get used to it and look around for direction, take it all in and work with it. I’m not one who takes direction well anyways... so I’m making mistakes and learning from them.
Blunder number one was deciding to use permanent black Sharpie markers to outline the decking planks instead of pencil lead. It worked well, was quick and easy but turned blue a few weeks after I finished the deck with Minwax Polycrylic clear topcoat.
Number two was the armor. I dyed and finished it above the glue line hoping that it could be bent into place. It’s plywood and I’m new and I was wrong. Even thin plywood doesn’t bend much.

