This is a very interesting post, Jim. You have effectively shifted the driver of value away from the model itself to the interests of the collector. That certainly aligns with my (hopefully respectful) review of the model that prompted this thread. Personally, I value precision of executionThat raises an interesting discussion. Thanks, mon ami!
What makes a model valuable to the collector community isn’t a single, fixed standard, because every collector brings their own priorities to a collection. For some, historical importance or rarity is paramount; for others, it’s the level of craftsmanship, accuracy, or faithfulness to original plans. Provenance, the builder's reputation, or even a personal connection to the subject can also play a decisive role. Ultimately, a model’s value often lies in how well it aligns with a collector’s own vision and tells a story that resonates with them, rather than in any universally agreed metric.
(how 'well' the model has been made) over-against other standards of 'collectability'. In other words, my perception of the value of this model has been biased by what I think a model should be - but my measure is understandably not the only measure.











