- Joined
- Jul 12, 2021
- Messages
- 137
- Points
- 143

@Waldemar,
This is a very interesting idea. Another researcher who looked at this issue had suggested that the bilge and futtock sweeps were not only arcs of circles, but the same arcs over most of the length with adjustment of the overlap ("haling down"), which I did not find entirely convincing. I like the idea of the outer edge of the floor defined as a logarithmic curve.
How would this accommodate the widening of the hull, most likely by shifting the futtocks outward on the bottom? The ship as built is about 4 feet wider amidships than the specification (17 aln/34 feet/10.098m).
Since I think that the transom shape up to the original wing transom is to the original specification, it might be possible to derive the original shape of the run from your curves.
Always good stuff from you.
Fred
This is a very interesting idea. Another researcher who looked at this issue had suggested that the bilge and futtock sweeps were not only arcs of circles, but the same arcs over most of the length with adjustment of the overlap ("haling down"), which I did not find entirely convincing. I like the idea of the outer edge of the floor defined as a logarithmic curve.
How would this accommodate the widening of the hull, most likely by shifting the futtocks outward on the bottom? The ship as built is about 4 feet wider amidships than the specification (17 aln/34 feet/10.098m).
Since I think that the transom shape up to the original wing transom is to the original specification, it might be possible to derive the original shape of the run from your curves.
Always good stuff from you.
Fred

