Thanks, Dean. I started on time with working out sone ideas.Peter, I think the idea of adding a diorama with stones, etc. is going to really enhance the display of your ship. Excellent work as usual.
Regards, Peter
![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE July/August 2026 |
![]() |
![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
Thanks, Dean. I started on time with working out sone ideas.Peter, I think the idea of adding a diorama with stones, etc. is going to really enhance the display of your ship. Excellent work as usual.
I ordered the 'architectural style' lamp on --> Amazon <-- and this afternoon it arrived.Hi mates,
Sharing a personal work area improvement - as is often said, “what a difference a day makes”. Hope that you don’t mind my brief indulgence….
My cluttered work table was annoying - lighting(s), and the much needed magnifying lamp that was too heavy and bulky also needed an upgrade.
Amazon (as always) delivered. A delightful improvements!!
Regards,
View attachment 617734

Good morning Peter. Ha, that looks awesome....the crew must have enjoyed your "little Balder". Cheers GrantYesterday and today the 1:50 Balder is /was on board of the 1:1 Balder.
View attachment 618182
It’s again “sHaring the City” in Vlaardingen:
View attachment 618181
Regards, Peter
You are right, Grant. We had animated conversations again. Especially with a former volunteer who had worked on the plan for the 2nd restoration in Vlaardingen. He sat looking at the model for a while and said: "I can't find anything that isn't right." And in 2025 he did that also and told the same to his Admiral!Good morning Peter. Ha, that looks awesome....the crew must have enjoyed your "little Balder". Cheers Grant
Now to me that is incredible, to catch that difference at 1:50. Outstanding!So that is 43.5 cm too much missing, and it explains the differences we observed.
Hi Peter, yes! The less than exact lines and varying shapes look fantastic and what most would expect to see at a seaside yard. Well done!With stones of slightly varying sizes, it gets quite an old-fashioned look.
That in itself isn't very special, Daniel. To scale, 43.5 cm is still 8.7 mm. If a hatch is 16 mm long, then you miss the dimension of slightly more than half a hatch. And that does stand out.Now to me that is incredible, to catch that difference at 1:50. Outstanding!
Thanks, Bill. I like your reference with ‘a seaside yard’.Hi Peter, yes! The less than exact lines and varying shapes look fantastic and what most would expect to see at a seaside yard. Well done!




True storyNow to me that is incredible, to catch that difference at 1:50. Outstanding!
Thanks for this picture, Maarten. I think it will be a combination of stones and wood. So far, I have glued the stones onto thick paper, so nothing is final yet.Hi Peter,
Great work again.
Regarding the wharf floor for these fishing wharfes I am not sure about the choice for your stone floor, allthough it looks great. The old shipyards had mainly wooden floors as you can see here on the historic yard in Spakenburg.
View attachment 619348

'It's all in de details.'True story
That’s no problem, Shota. Can’t hear you from that distanceDear Peter
I'm speechless!
Thanks for this, Shota.it's a masterpiece![]()



