• SUBSCRIBE TO SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!

    The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
    Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.

    NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE MARCH/APRIL 2026
  • Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.

Brilliant 64 Gun Ship 1690 3d Project

Joined
Jan 21, 2022
Messages
953
Points
403

Hi

I would like to present you my latest project Le Brilliant 1690. Subject is challenging as original plans haven't survived till today. Fortunetly we have plans taken form
Tanneron's model in Musée de la Marine de Paris which is much better situation then Soleil Royal model. Another positive thing Brilliant model looks much less questionable and there's not a debate how much Tanneron changed in it in a way that can't fit historical period of ship. However, there are still some differences between the model and Berain's sketches which I intend to fill in.


I deliberately named this thread as a 3D project and not a model because I don't want to limit myself to just visualizations. Just like with Renommee, I want to create the whole ship, not just the decorations. This creates a much greater difficulty because there are no drawings of the weapons or equipment, let alone the planking.
After studying a large amount of materials and consultations, and especially thanks to @GuyM and @Hubac’s Historian who were patient in answering all my questions, I believe I will be able to fill in these gaps.


Moving on to the practical aspect of the project, I should point out something that affects the historical accuracy of the model being built. In the case of plans from the NMM or the Danish archives, ornamentation and decorations are often superimposed on the plans. In this case, for the reasons mentioned above, I am more inclined to capture the appearance of the vessel than to reconstruct it.


The easiest way to explain this is with an example.
These are the sketches of the Renommee’s ornaments,


Renome Stern Caffieri.jpg

and this is the actual structure of the ship.

Renome Stern Caffieri-blend.jpg

I'm left with this
Souvenir de Marine-139 Briliant.jpg

and this to merge

IMG_2950.jpeg.3c3fe00621320dd3c598091e3491d699.jpeg


Without further ado, here’s what Brilliant looks like today. I hope this unique project will be interesting to others as well as to me. I’m also open to any feedback—if you spot any errors or inaccuracies, I’ll definitely try to fix them. To be honest, the hull still needs some work, but I needed a base from which to work on the stern​


Briliant 1.jpg
Briliant 2.jpg
Briliant 3.jpg
 
Hi WojtasS,
Very impressive! Do you have a resin printer yourself?
Thanks. Yes and a laser cutter too.
Check out my other tread where I designed La Renommee. You'll find much more explanation how I build the hull

 
Hi

I would like to present you my latest project Le Brilliant 1690. Subject is challenging as original plans haven't survived till today. Fortunetly we have plans taken form
Tanneron's model in Musée de la Marine de Paris which is much better situation then Soleil Royal model. Another positive thing Brilliant model looks much less questionable and there's not a debate how much Tanneron changed in it in a way that can't fit historical period of ship. However, there are still some differences between the model and Berain's sketches which I intend to fill in.


I deliberately named this thread as a 3D project and not a model because I don't want to limit myself to just visualizations. Just like with Renommee, I want to create the whole ship, not just the decorations. This creates a much greater difficulty because there are no drawings of the weapons or equipment, let alone the planking.
After studying a large amount of materials and consultations, and especially thanks to @GuyM and @Hubac’s Historian who were patient in answering all my questions, I believe I will be able to fill in these gaps.


Moving on to the practical aspect of the project, I should point out something that affects the historical accuracy of the model being built. In the case of plans from the NMM or the Danish archives, ornamentation and decorations are often superimposed on the plans. In this case, for the reasons mentioned above, I am more inclined to capture the appearance of the vessel than to reconstruct it.


The easiest way to explain this is with an example.
These are the sketches of the Renommee’s ornaments,


View attachment 601119

and this is the actual structure of the ship.

View attachment 601120

I'm left with this
View attachment 601131

and this to merge

View attachment 601132


Without further ado, here’s what Brilliant looks like today. I hope this unique project will be interesting to others as well as to me. I’m also open to any feedback—if you spot any errors or inaccuracies, I’ll definitely try to fix them. To be honest, the hull still needs some work, but I needed a base from which to work on the stern​


View attachment 601128
View attachment 601129
View attachment 601130
Hi; it looks really good:) I did some adjustments on one of your pics showing the top part of the decor; I put in yellow what I found from the original drawing; there's a ''doubling of the top contour of the stern board carving (in orange), I also thinned out the ''spinnes'' on the right side (in orange) and, on the drawing there are ''sunrays'' which seem like being of an altering different textures....I put rays in orange, but I'm not sure whether it is in fact a wave type of carving ( doubtful) or that texture alternation to separate the sunrays ( most likely)....

There is also an alternate drawing of the Brillant's decor with different balcony posts designs....Have a look at all of that:)

brillant d1.jpg

brillant6.jpg

brillant7.jpg
 
Hi; it looks really good:) I did some adjustments on one of your pics showing the top part of the decor; I put in yellow what I found from the original drawing; there's a ''doubling of the top contour of the stern board carving (in orange), I also thinned out the ''spinnes'' on the right side (in orange) and, on the drawing there are ''sunrays'' which seem like being of an altering different textures....I put rays in orange, but I'm not sure whether it is in fact a wave type of carving ( doubtful) or that texture alternation to separate the sunrays ( most likely)....

There is also an alternate drawing of the Brillant's decor with different balcony posts designs....Have a look at all of that:)
Thank you. I missed this contour, I'll add it for sure. I refrained from adding the rays because I think they'll only be visible in the visualization. They will be barely visible on the 3D print, I think, unless I make them much thicker than in the sketch, but I'll test it. Thanks for pointing out such details. I rejected the alternative version of the decorations due to their very low quality. In addition, the plans are based on the Tanneron's model, which makes the already complicated work much easier.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. I missed this contour, I'll add it for sure. I refrained from adding the rays because I think they'll only be visible in the visualization. They will be barely visible on the 3D print, I think, unless I make them much thicker than in the sketch, but I'll test it. Thanks for pointing out such details. I rejected the alternative version of the decorations due to their very low quality. In addition, the plans are based on the Tannerono model, which makes the already complicated work much easier.
Yes, of course the ''sunrays'' can be added in other ways, whether through texturing after, or using thicker coats of paint and dabbing them with the handle end of a paint brush when the top surface of the paint has barely hardened while drying; as for the alternate drawing, I sent it to illustrate some design possibilities you could use if you think it would be of a better effect:)
 
I'll think how to get the sunrays somehow. The alternative is illustration is very tempting, but I think I'm going to stay consistient with one vison. Thanks for interest in subject I'm always happy to hear your insights
 
Back
Top