- Joined
- Apr 20, 2020
- Messages
- 5,735
- Points
- 738
Dear friendDear Friends
Let's start:
RESEARCH RESULTS - PART 1 THE FIRST EXPEDITION TO THE NORTH 1594
The following extract is from the 1598 journal of Gerrit de Veer
Eerstelijck zijn inden jaere 94. vier schepen toeghemaeckt, twee tot Amstelredam (2) een in Zeelandt (3) ende een tot Enckhuysen (4), om op te doen de gheleghentheyt ende streckinghe na de landen ende Conincrijcken van Cathay ende China. Willem Barentsz. een cloeck vermaert ende versocht stuerman, beleyder is gheweest vande schepen van Amstelredam.
(2) De namen dier schepen zijn niet bekend.
3) De „Zwaan" onder Cornelis Cornelisz. Nay.
4) De „Mercurius" onder Brandt IJsbrandtsz Tetgales, alwaar Jan Huyghen van Linschoten geembarkeerd was.
Translated to English
In the year 1594, four ships were equipped/prepared (toeghemaeckt) - two from Amsterdam (Amstelredam) (2), one from Zeeland (Zeelandt) (3) and one from Enkhuyzen (Enckhuysen) (4) to embark on an expedition to find the kingdoms of Cathay and China via a Northern Passage. As navigator and leader of the Amsterdam ships was Willem Barentsz a very experienced and competent helmsman.
(2) The names of these two ships (the ships from Amsterdam) are not known.
(3) The Swan under the captaincy of Cornelis Corneliszoon Nay.
(4) The Mercurius/Mercury under the captaincy of Brandt Ijsbrandysz Tetgales on which Jan Huygen van Linschoten was also embarked.
This does not surprise me in the least. It is important to note that De Veer did NOT GO on the first expedition. It is believed that he gleaned his information which he used in his report of the journey from the journals of Van Linschoten and Barentsz himself.
Van Linschoten's journal though, does not offer any more information of the ships that embarked on the first trip. He writes:
De Schepen in Texel ghecomen zijnde, te weten, de drie in de Voorreden verhaelt, als namelicken, t'Boot ghenaemt de Swane van der Veere in Zeelant, de Mercurius van Enchuysen, ende t’Boot van Amsterdam. Op ’t schip van Amsterdam was Schipper en Stuerman Willem Barentsz van der Schelling, Borgher t'Amsterdam, een seer ervaren ende bedreven Man in de const van de Zeevaert, hebbende by hem een Schellinger Visschers jacht *), om hem in sijn voorghenomen Reyse (van ons afscheydende) gheselschap te houden.
Translated to English
The three ships that arrived in Texel were the same ones mentioned in the prologue namely a boat, the Swane from Ter Veere in Zeeland, the Mercurius of Enkhuyzen and a boat from Amsterdam. On the ship of Amsterdam, the captain and helmsman was Willem Barentsz a very experienced and knowledgeable seafarer. With him he took a fishing smack from Terschelling to accompany him when the expedition embarked on their separate courses.
This I do find somewhat surprising as Van Linschoten's journals (he also went on the 1595 expedition) are generally more comprehensive than those of De Veer. The fact that he did not mention the Amsterdam ships' names might be indicative of the rift that existed between Zeeland/Enkhuizen and Amsterdam. This was not only the political rift that existed between the states of the Netherlands at that time, but also a difference of opinion as to which route to follow. That is why Barentsz followed a different route to Nay. Van Linschoten often refers to Barentsz as "the Amsterdammer" not even mentioning him by name. However, be that as it may, the important thing is that we still do not know the names of the Amsterdam ships.
BUT THEN ...
I made the following discovery courtesy of the Hakluyt's Society's English translation in which Dr. Beke (who edited the edition) confirms the entries about Zeelandt's "The Swan" and Enkhuyzen's "Mercurius" and then writes nonchalantly:
View attachment 353347
A third vessel was accordingly fitted out by the merchants of Amsterdam. It was of the same size and character as the other two, and like Tetgales's vessel was named the Mercury (Mercurius); its command being entrusted to William Barents (sic) who took with him also a fishing-boat belonging to Ter Schelling.
For sure this had me very excited but without corroboration, it meant nothing. Corroboration came in the form of a footnote supplied by Beke in which he mentioned the works of JH Forster and Admiral Litke.
The following extract is taken from Viermalige Reise durch das nördliche Eismeer: auf der Brigg Nowaja Semlja in den Jahren 1821 - 1824 Ausgeführt von Kapitain-Lieutenant Friedrich Litke (Edition Erdmann) (German Edition)
View attachment 353348
Litke thus confirms Zeelandt's "The Swan" and Enkhuyzen's "Mercurius", but he calls Barentsz's ship "der Gesandte".
This was not what I had hoped for, so on to Forster.
History of the Voyages and Discoveries made in the North. Translated from the German of Johann Reinhold Forster and elucidated by a New and Original Map of the Countries situated about the North Pole. Printed for Luke White, Dame Street, and Pat Byrne, Grafton Street, Dublin, 1786.
View attachment 353349
For the fourth time I had confirmation of The Swan and Mercurius, but to confuse everything Forster called Barentsz's ship
"The Boot / Messenger"
If you had been bored to death at this point and fell asleep earlier ...
View attachment 353350
Thus, I had three possibilities for the name of Barentsz's ship on the first expedition:
View attachment 353351
"Der Gesandte" translated into English gives the following options:
View attachment 353352
And the moment that I saw that one of "Der Gesandte"'s translations was "MESSENGER" the lights came on, big time! Now I had Mercury/Mercurius (Messenger of the Gods in Roman Mythology; Messenger and Messenger, but what about "Boot"?
The explanation came via the Hakluyt's Society Second Edition and another footnote.
View attachment 353354
And of course, the moment that I translated "Bote" into English, the answer was:
View attachment 353355
BINGO - Four out of four corroborations: The Hakluyt's Society's Two English translations, the work of Forster and the work of Litke.
I can state categorically and without any shadow of doubt that the name of Barentsz's ship during the First Expedition was "DE MERCURIUS".
Your research is extremely thorough and a pleasure to learn from, your research expertise is reflected in the quality of this beautiful model .
Glad you found an established reference for the ship's name