BEST WISHES KEN
WOW! Both Ken has a birthday today!! @Ken and @Bluebeard Guys Enjoy your special day, lot's of fun and happiness!!Thank you Jimsky.
This last year has been great since I started participating in this forum.
I have learned with you guys building logs like never before.
This question of scale is one I struggle with. Not only is making tiny things tiny enough difficult - but they sometimes seem too small in the end. What are your thoughts on this? How do you determine what can be done or what should be done?Hello Everyone. Thank you all for your kind comments and best wishes. This old man got down to finishing off the head area with the addition of the grating. It's pretty close to the plan, just one less rung. The plan required about .8 square rails, as they were going to be butt jointed I thought that this would make them too frail so I used 2 x 2mm and after sanding down a bit they looked ok.View attachment 218866
View attachment 218915View attachment 218917View attachment 218918Well my friend, you know that I probably don’t have as much experience as you. So based in that, now I recognize my limits and I don’t try to build small. Also when I’m working on a specific part of a specific ship I ask myself, How much will people notice this 3 hour task piece I’m doing here?
Yes I also understand we build for our own satisfaction and not for others.
Here is a sample of the head of a model that Im working on that took me an entire day to get it done and I know is not even close to what other guys can do in this forum.
Hi Paul. Thanks for thinking that I could give an answer to this often asked question but I must disappoint you, I’m not the chosen one. I said at the start of my log that I wasn’t concerned with scale and historical accuracy and that is my philosophy, it is for others to achieve it if they want. My opinion is that within reason if it looks right, is a good match for other components and your happy with it then it’s fine. I see builders use blocks for canons that look so obviously out of scale, they add them because they are part of the detailing but instead of looking better they do more to spoil the look. I have an excuse for not tackling tiny parts because of my missing fingers, but less is often more. On my canons instead of some blocks I just use eyelets and thread the ropes through these, if you look at my Victory and Royal William you’ll see this, it’s often been said to me that until I pointed it out on my logs that it wasn’t noticed. I think that the eye often sees what it expects and not what is actually there so some of these details are lost unless you are actually looking for them. Anyway that’s just my opinion and I respect everyone’s personal goal in modelling, its good to have a broad spectrum.This question of scale is one I struggle with. Not only is making tiny things tiny enough difficult - but they sometimes seem too small in the end. What are your thoughts on this? How do you determine what can be done or what should be done?
I always say, do what looks good to you. That’s what I do on my ships. I’m not worried about historical accuracy. I build for enjoyment and to make something that I like. I am the one who will see it long after the build log is finished.Hi Paul. Thanks for thinking that I could give an answer to this often asked question but I must disappoint you, I’m not the chosen one. I said at the start of my log that I wasn’t concerned with scale and historical accuracy and that is my philosophy, it is for others to achieve it if they want. My opinion is that within reason if it looks right, is a good match for other components and your happy with it then it’s fine. I see builders use blocks for canons that look so obviously out of scale, they add them because they are part of the detailing but instead of looking better they do more to spoil the look. I have an excuse for not tackling tiny parts because of my missing fingers, but less is often more. On my canons instead of some blocks I just use eyelets and thread the ropes through these, if you look at my Victory and Royal William you’ll see this, it’s often been said to me that until I pointed it out on my logs that it wasn’t noticed. I think that the eye often sees what it expects and not what is actually there so some of these details are lost unless you are actually looking for them. Anyway that’s just my opinion and I respect everyone’s personal goal in modelling, its good to have a broad spectrum.