HMS Diana 1:48 by Modelship Dockyard -Build log

The blackening of your guns is looking very good - very good appearance
 
Very good results with the carriages
Mabye only the axles are slightly too long - I would reduce by 50% (like shown with green line)
guns.JPG
How did you make the small nails in the wheels - looking very good
 
HMS Diana is a Artois Class fifth rate frigate built in 1794 at Deptford Dockyard, to cope with the out break of war with France.
She have with 38 nominal guns, however she have acturally 28 of 18 pounders (gun deck), 4 of 9 pdrs, and 14 32 pdrs carronades.
As a frigate she have been to service in England waters, Mediterranean, West Indies, and South America. And have capetured several ships that mainly privateers. She was sold to the Dutch navy after war period in 1815.
Kit designed by Modelship Dockyard, based on the NMM drawings of the Artois class. This kit is currently only avaliable for tailor made as being limited by the production capacity.
Hallo @fj3131030
we wish you all the BEST and a HAPPY BIRTHDAY
Birthday-Cake
Enjoy your special day
 
I just noticed you have brick work where the Brodie stove would sit. This brings up a question, hope someone has the answer...... At some point in the 18th century the stove sat on an iron plate or sometimes stone rather than on brick work. I know the modern-day Victory shows stone rather than brick or iron but is this how it was most commonly done in the late 18th and early 19th century or were iron plates used instead most of the time? There is a good discussion on this on HMS Fly's build log of Diana but there is nothing definitive as to when brick flooring was eliminated, and stone or iron came into use.
Allan
 
Last edited:
So David White shows stone and iron rather than brick for that time period. I would love to know his source. Many thanks Henslow
Allan
 
I understand your idea. In fact, I thought so before. It was not until I made Lexington that I changed my mind. The manufacturer's reply to me was very simple. If you want to restore it completely, why not make a POF model? Since POB has better effects, why not choose a simpler production method?

I initially shared @Submarinerblue ’s dislike of the ‘plastic kit’ aspects of the build but I can’t find a way to refute your manufacturer’s logic. If we allow plywood and resin glues, paint with acrylics and rig with polyester thread, why not make use of 3D mouldings underneath? Why on Earth would I want to make construction both more difficult and less accurate?

You have single-handedly dragged me into the 21st century.
 
Excellent work. I like it. neat and precise everything. One piece of advice, how to finish the process when you don't need to take the model in your hands - use a copper cleaner to remove fingerprints and stains. (first try it on a sample). This way the surface will be uniform and will darken evenly.
 
Back
Top