• Win a Free Custom Engraved Brass Coin!!!
    As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering.
  • SUBSCRIBE TO SHIPS IN SCALE TODAY!

    The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026!
    Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue.

    NOTE THAT OUR NEXT ISSUE WILL BE MARCH/APRIL 2026

L'Orenoque Mamoli 1:100 scale

Jerry!!! I knew someone would answer my plea to be stopped!:eek: Thank you! I guess I'll have to build the Royal Caroline at some point.ROTF

BTW - I'm about to be bitten by the scratch building bug - just between you and me and our shipmates - The Admiral recently gave me a bonus and I am about to pull the trigger on Blue Jacket's Kearsarge kit. That led me to look for plans. That led me to the National Archives which led me to the discovery of of the Civil War Kearsarge AND the predreadnought Kearsarge BB-5 with plans in 1/8 and 1/4 inch scales at the National Archives!!!! ALSO - when I was on the French plans website about a year ago I saw plans for a USS Missouri sidewheel frigate;) Also asked National Archives for those plans AND for the predreadnought USS Missouri BB-11!!! See, I was thinking to build the USS Susquehanna from scratch based on the plan set I bought of McCardle's model - But since Missouri is my adopted home state - you guessed it - 1/96 scale sidewheeler and predreadhought USS Missouri models!!!!

Yes. Lost my mind:p:p:pROTF

Blessings.
Chuck
I love the archives, especially in person, where I get to see and handle those original documents.

I think building a ship that has some meaning to you is always a good choice; a relative served on it; ancestors came over on it; or just named for a place meaningful to you. I chose Constellation because I spent years working in Baltimore harbor, right next to her, and she was a part of my regular scenery. Pride of Baltimore I helped build, and later crewed on. As a Hornblower fan I wanted to build HMS Lydia, (a fictional boat) but had no clue what plan to base her on, so I went with Macedonian as I had access to drawings, and she served in both with Britain and the US Navy. I basically wanted a British frigate. ;) I had planned to build another boat I worked on; Gazela Primeiro, but I've bitten off more than I can probably chew with the three I have already.
If Missouri touches your heart in some way, certainly, go for it!
 
Last edited:
I love the archives, especially in person, where I get to see and handle those original documents.

I think building a ship that has some meaning to you is always a good choice; a relative served on it; ancestors came over on it; or just named for a place meaningful to you. I chose Constellation because I spent years working in Baltimore harbor, right next to her, and she was a part of my regular scenery. Pride of Baltimore I helped build, and later crewed on. As a Hornblower fan I wanted to build HMS Lydia, (a fictional boat) but had no clue what plan to base her on, so I went with Macedonian as I had access to drawings, and she served in both with Britain and the US Navy. I basically wanted a British frigate. ;) I had planned to build another boat I worked on; Gazela Primeiro, but I've bitten off more than I can probably chew with the three I have already.
If Missouri touches your heart in some way, certainly, go for it!
The Lydia! Love it! My attachments are not as significant as yours, Jerry. Although I have had HMS Surprise in the back of my mind for a long long time. I learned a whole lot from those books over the years (1996 - present) and many readings of each one (10 times through). I just think it will be really nifty to build the predecessors to the Big Mo!

Thank you for sharing - I looked at your Lydia/Macedonian WOW!

Blessings. Peace. Gratitude.
Chuck
 
What ho, shipmates!

A more or less final detour into my scratch building plans - My friends at the National Archives got back to me. Apparently, if the plans are digitized it's up to the interested person to download them and deal with scaling them. If the plans are not digitized, the interested person can visit the archives and ask, in person, that certain plans be digitized-while-you-wait. I'm looking forward to my trip to College Park, Maryland! And if I get impatient, apparently, one can hire an experienced researcher to do the in-person leg work ROTF

Here's my thinking. I want to build 1/96 scale models. So If I find the length of the hull and multiply that by .125 the result will be my hull length in inches - right? So all I have to do is invest a few $ at Kinkos making copies until the copy arrives that fits the above length result - right?

Final question - when an authoritative source gives the hull length - where on the hull is the line for the length - waterline? the longest horizontal distance - ?

For example the Sidewheel Steam Frigate Missouri info from Naval History and Heritage Command gives these specs: (Steam Frigate: displacement 3,220 tons; length 229'0"; beam 40'0"; draft 19'0"; complement 257; armament: 2 X-inch Paixhan guns, 8 VIII-inch Paixhan guns; class Mississippi)

229 feet long and 40 feet beam at 1/96 scale is 28.625 inches long and 5 inches wide (not including the sponsons).

Looking forward to your thoughts!

Blessings. Peace. Gratitude.
Chuck
 
What ho, shipmates!

A more or less final detour into my scratch building plans - My friends at the National Archives got back to me. Apparently, if the plans are digitized it's up to the interested person to download them and deal with scaling them. If the plans are not digitized, the interested person can visit the archives and ask, in person, that certain plans be digitized-while-you-wait. I'm looking forward to my trip to College Park, Maryland! And if I get impatient, apparently, one can hire an experienced researcher to do the in-person leg work ROTF

Here's my thinking. I want to build 1/96 scale models. So If I find the length of the hull and multiply that by .125 the result will be my hull length in inches - right? So all I have to do is invest a few $ at Kinkos making copies until the copy arrives that fits the above length result - right?

Final question - when an authoritative source gives the hull length - where on the hull is the line for the length - waterline? the longest horizontal distance - ?

For example the Sidewheel Steam Frigate Missouri info from Naval History and Heritage Command gives these specs: (Steam Frigate: displacement 3,220 tons; length 229'0"; beam 40'0"; draft 19'0"; complement 257; armament: 2 X-inch Paixhan guns, 8 VIII-inch Paixhan guns; class Mississippi)

229 feet long and 40 feet beam at 1/96 scale is 28.625 inches long and 5 inches wide (not including the sponsons).

Looking forward to your thoughts!

Blessings. Peace. Gratitude.
Chuck
The thing with "length" is, where are they measuring? Taff-rail to the figurehead's eyebrows? Between perpendiculars? On deck, and which deck, spar, gun?
It's best when there's a scale on the drawing, usually right under the keel. American drawings often have something like "1 inch equals 8 feet" which is worthless unless you have a copy you know to be 1:1 with the original. You have no way of knowing if a digital copy is true to the original drawing or not.
I have 3D models of the Mississippi's 10in pivots, and 8" shell-guns ready to print ;)
mississippi_shell_gun.jpg pivot_gun20200713b.jpg 8inch_shell_gun20240306.png
 
I was under the impression that the stated size of the hull was a measurement of the waterline in three dimensions as it follows the curve of the hull, as opposed to a 2-D straight line from stem to stern. Of course, I might be completely wrong about that
 
From my understanding it would appear to be upper (or main) deck length if registered with lloyds . you can see it is marked here on the upper design of Campbells Cutty plans.cutty sark hullA.jpg
 
What ho, shipmates!

Thanks for the input on "length." Namabiiru, I like Martin's answer better ROTF ROTF ROTF . I can see it either way - back then, I suppose a designer could take the measurements between the hull profiles at the waterline level and have the 3D length. (See lower right hand corner of the Cutty plan Martin posted.) Occam' razor is telling me that length of deck makes more sense because it is the simple answer.

Since all I got in response to my math questions was Thumbsup - and thank you all for that, I Thumbsup you too ROTF - I am proceeding from the conclusion that my math and logic are, if not correct, at least Thumbsup.

Been a super busy week - BIG PLANS for time in the shipyard starting at cock crow tomorrow:p

I hope you all have, are having, will have your best day ever!

Blessings. Peace. Gratitude.
Chuck
 
What ho, shipmates!

Thanks for the input on "length." Namabiiru, I like Martin's answer better ROTF ROTF ROTF . I can see it either way - back then, I suppose a designer could take the measurements between the hull profiles at the waterline level and have the 3D length. (See lower right hand corner of the Cutty plan Martin posted.) Occam' razor is telling me that length of deck makes more sense because it is the simple answer.

Since all I got in response to my math questions was Thumbsup - and thank you all for that, I Thumbsup you too ROTF - I am proceeding from the conclusion that my math and logic are, if not correct, at least Thumbsup.

Been a super busy week - BIG PLANS for time in the shipyard starting at cock crow tomorrow:p

I hope you all have, are having, will have your best day ever!

Blessings. Peace. Gratitude.
Chuck
You only get a Thumbsup for maths in imperial because i can no longer follow it! I was schooled in it but it changed over to metric when i was about seven and that seems a long time ago now !
 
There are several definitions of Length depending on the situation:

Length overall- just that, measured from the bow to the stern.

Length on Deck- Again, as the name implies the length of the main deck.

Length between perpendiculars- The length between the Forward and After Perpendiculars shown in the vessel’s lines drawing.

Register Length- Used in the calculation of the vessel’s tonnage; it’s internal cargo carrying volume.

Don’t know which of these the Naval Historical Center is using, but the last two are unlikely. Of the first two I thin that it’s length on deck. Of course in no case do these measurements include spars such as the bowsprit.

Roger
 
What ho, shipmates!

Thanks for the input on "length." Namabiiru, I like Martin's answer better ROTF ROTF ROTF . I can see it either way - back then, I suppose a designer could take the measurements between the hull profiles at the waterline level and have the 3D length. (See lower right hand corner of the Cutty plan Martin posted.) Occam' razor is telling me that length of deck makes more sense because it is the simple answer.

Since all I got in response to my math questions was Thumbsup - and thank you all for that, I Thumbsup you too ROTF - I am proceeding from the conclusion that my math and logic are, if not correct, at least Thumbsup.

Been a super busy week - BIG PLANS for time in the shipyard starting at cock crow tomorrow:p

I hope you all have, are having, will have your best day ever!

Blessings. Peace. Gratitude.
Chuck
 
Back
Top