Hi Gary,Bob Cleek, that is the best analysis of the application of scale to modelling that I have read. Ever. Thankyou! I have saved it for reference.
I would add a small comment.
I made a 1:93 model of Constitution, and did not add anything to mark the presence of deck securing nails or trenails, on the grounds that the scale size of the visible parts on the deck would have been only microns. But the deck looked a bit bland, naked even. A bit fake and toylike.
Currently I am making a scratch 1:72 HMS Bellerophon/Elephant (not decided which yet). I calculated the size of the trenails at deck level to be 0.25mm diameter at the scale. To avoid repeating the nakedness I lasered marks for the trenail "heads" and plank edges and end joins. Photos at different distances are attached. I think that the nakedness has been avoided but would be interested in opinions from others.
When showing the model to other modellers I have noted that they do tend to inspect the deck at a distance, then come in for a closer inspection.
Bob, do you think that while the model size of each trenail is minute, perhaps we should consider acknowledging the visual effect of the sheer number of those trenails?
trenails View attachment 594952View attachment 594953
Don't know which "26" you are referring to.
The close up photo probably equates to viewing the full size Bellerophon deck from about 15'/4.5m above. The model deck planks are 3.1mm wide; x72=220mm/9". The wooden trenails in British ships of the era were typically 1.5" diameter at the deck. So yes, I think that the model trenail dots are about the correct diameter. Maybe a little darker than required, but pretty close.
Where in Oz are you located?
Johnv




