A classic Ken model- you have skills. Cheers GrantHello. Just some pictures today. The canons mounted on the fore deck and the mast collar.
View attachment 568237
View attachment 568238
View attachment 568239
![]() |
As a way to introduce our brass coins to the community, we will raffle off a free coin during the month of August. Follow link ABOVE for instructions for entering. |
![]() |
![]() |
The beloved Ships in Scale Magazine is back and charting a new course for 2026! Discover new skills, new techniques, and new inspirations in every issue. NOTE THAT OUR FIRST ISSUE WILL BE JAN/FEB 2026 |
![]() |
A classic Ken model- you have skills. Cheers GrantHello. Just some pictures today. The canons mounted on the fore deck and the mast collar.
View attachment 568237
View attachment 568238
View attachment 568239

Hi Grant, Thanks for the compliment. I don't know about skills, this was built some years ago well before I joined the forum and it proved to be my biggest learning curve. KenA classic Ken model- you have skills. Cheers Grant
















How did you do that, Ken?I copied the plan onto a piece of 1.5mm walnut ply

Hi Paul, It’s one of the very useful and easy tricks that I’ve picked up, I’ve explained the technique in detail on page three of the log. I’ve also shown how accurate I was able to transfer the gunport positions from plan to hull. KenHow did you do that, Ken?
Thank you, Ken. I am following your log but must have missed that posting. As I read it I seem to remember others showing something similar. My thanks!Hi Paul, It’s one of the very useful and easy tricks that I’ve picked up, I’ve explained the technique in detail on page three of the log. I’ve also shown how accurate I was able to transfer the gunport positions from plan to hull. Ken

























You are very productive with your build, Ken. And it’s all looking very nice.The channels were made up, fitted then painted. I also made up and fitted the support brackets. They are not accurate but just a simple generic version in keeping with the rest of the build. I thought that as they would be masked by the dead eye lanyards my eyes wouldn’t focus on them so they would look ok.
Next I made up and fitted the dead eyes. The material supplied with the kit was pretty good stuff, the dead eyes were very good quality, the ready made strops were nice to use, they were made from a very malleable copper wire and were a nice color, the eyelet straps were perhaps too thick if you were concerned about scale, I used them and thought that once in place they looked ok. Although I followed the plan I found that not all the strops cleared the gun ports and I had to fill in a few holes that I’d made in the channels and drill new ones to get a better fit. This was probably my fault, a little out with the ports plus a little out with the channel adds up. I think that if I were to do it again I would wait until the channels were in place before drilling the holes for the strops, or improve the accuracy of my building.
My next job will be to start making up the port lids.
Thanks for visiting.
View attachment 569825
View attachment 569826
View attachment 569827
View attachment 569828
View attachment 569829
View attachment 569830
View attachment 569831
View attachment 569832
View attachment 569833







Hi Allan. I’m impressed with your knowledge of these ships and the way that you are able to explain in a way that make sense of historical detail. Thanks for taking the time to comment on my humble build and for your liking. I must confess that my enjoyment in building models is in the actual making and not the historical accuracy, I build mainly out of the box using the plans and what’s supplied in a kit, just doing the best job that I can. I do however enjoy reading the logs of some very expert builders that post on this forum and often wish that I had the perseverance and patience to emulate their models.Your model is looking great.
Not sure if it matters to you but gangboards were not used until about 1740 which I believe and skid beams to support the boats came about around the end of the century. Prior to that spare spars were laid across the waist opening from the gallows or, in some cases the QD, to the forecastle and the boats rested on these. When skid beams were introduced, they sat in cradles that were inserted into the gangboards as they were not permanent. They did become a permanent feature by 1800 when the crutches or cradles were as shown below. I am guessing this is a kit idea, but in reality they were never done as in the photo in post #130. Look at the scantlings of the Establishments and there is nothing about the gangways or skid beams. On the other hand the Shipbuilder's Repositoy 1788 and Steel's The Elements and Practice of Naval Architecture (circa 1795) list these and give dimensions.
A later model of Royal Willaim, around 1740 at RMG does show narrow gangways. When they came into use to replace ladders from the upper deck to the QD and FC they were as much as 48" broad on first rates (0,66"" at 1:72 scale) according to Peter Goodwin in The Construction and Fitting of English Ships of War) but there were no skid beams as they had not come into use until 25 years later.
Allan
View attachment 569847
The below pic is from page 210 of The Construction and Fitting of English Men of War by Peter Goodwin
View attachment 569848
Model at Preble Hall 1725
View attachment 569849
Model at Preble Hall of British 2nd rate 1720
View attachment 569850
Allan

