Hi Rick,I just shake my head every time I log onto your thread. I do have a question? You apparently know a great deal about the vessel. I was reading a thread on a Germany Form of another outstanding build, and the guy moved the Bow Sprint from center to the right. I have not seen anyone else do this. Have you seen a detail like this? As always impressed with this build.
Rick
Thank you for your input.Hi Rick,
The kit you show is the totaly reworked deagostini kit, it is posted on the Wertringer modellbau forum. We have a post on that model here also by Nigel @NMBROOK with some fantastic work.
Sovereign of the Seas-Deagostini Partwork-1/84 TOTALLY Reworked
Hello Everyone Firstly,a few of the longer standing members will remember this log before the crash.Unfortuneately my images were lost when my laptop harddrive fried so I was unable to repair the log. I am going to attempt to present a sequence of pictures that show the best I can,the progress...shipsofscale.com
The reason for moving the bowsprit is correct. The older ships had a stem with a far less gradient angle, the fwd wast was more to the front leaving less space for fixing the bow sprit. The bow sprit was attached along side the fwd mast and there for off centre. However the tip of the bow sprit was in line with the other masts.
See below this bow sprit passing by along the stem and not on top of the stem as in English ships later in the 17yh century. This is a contempory van de Velde drawing of the ship, you clearly see a lion carving on top of the stem with the bow sprit passing behind it.
View attachment 107888
So you be the fella that took this kit to a whole different level. I spent 8 years in Germany and do speak or I will say tried to speak the language. Enough to order a beer anyway. I saved your build log from the German Forum and have looked at the photos repeatedly to glean from your mad skills. Now that I know you are here, I will follow along.Thank you for the detailed explanation Maarten.
I really love the drawing of van de Velde. There you see that the kit is only halfway accurate. But I have to admit that I am building my Sovereign more for looks than to make a historical accurate model.
By the way I also made a small progress. I continued with the railing on the bow castle and also added some decoration to the bow area. There you also see on of my problems. The bow is to small to fit two rows of decoration. So I decided to stay with one (picture will be uploaded when I have finished it). I know it is not historically correct, but as I have written before if I have to choose I go for the look. Hope you understand my decision.
View attachment 108133
Hi Wolfgang
The bowsprit discussion is something that was covered a few years ago now on a forum I was a member of when I started my build.Basically it was decided that the offset bowsprit design was the only feasible option given the proximity to the foremast which is further forward than later vessels in relation to the foremast.The only way for a solid anchor for the bowsprit was to run this along side and past the foremast.However the foremost tip of the bowsprit would still fall on the centreline of the ship.
This detail also featured on Revenge if memory serves me right.
This is by no means a criticism of your build and I defy anyone to make a historically accurate model of this vessel.Two years of research have been expended on my model and still there are many grey areas and many areas open to builders interpretation.
Bottom line is build what makes you happy,either path you follow,Sovereign can build into a stunning model.
Kind Regards
Nigel