Daniel20 – No I thought that the two heads (seats of ease) were actually too large – when visually glancing at, And comparing them to the stairs.
PT-2 as always thanks! You are much too kind - Much appreciated.
Grant: Big thanks as well – thanks for your interest in this project.
Kurt: Yes, indeed those deadeyes and their lashing will be resurrected in the upper masts lol….
I am re-visiting the belaying pins “issue” especially at the forecastle deck. The Sergal kit also does not allow for lashing ropes at forward forecastle railings. My work around will be to add a cross timbers above all railings. This would preclude adding pin rails as much as possible.
In any case, its clear to me from other sources that I use, including McKay that the Sergal rigging plans are very inaccurate. And they don’t include running rigging plans for adding sails. The end results will probably be a hybrid, Vasa (similar vintage), McKay and Anderson Frankenstein monster rigging effort.
Also given that no empirical rigging data are available for ships of that vintage, adds to the conundrum.
I remember being so “obsessed” with the Vasa trying to very correctly pin all ropes to their historically accurate place…hmmm???. its been FIVE years and builders are still waiting for Vasa II rigging book…..
Now, when I look at the Vasa I have very little idea looking at that jungle of lines, if in fact they are placed correctly. Looks ok – so all good…
View attachment 265114View attachment 265115View attachment 265116View attachment 265117View attachment 265118View attachment 265119View attachment 265120As always thank for comments, likes and just dropping by. PS: rigging image is from McKay.