- Joined
- Oct 1, 2023
- Messages
- 1,181
- Points
- 393
No apologies needed, Peter, my reaction was more to forewarn Ted that I didn't follow the YQ instructions, so while I might be able to answer some of Ted's questions, my build deviates too much in order for it to be able to help Ted out.My excuses, Johan. But also to Daniel. For pointing yours and Daniel’s as build-to-instruction. That’s the problem when you start typing BN builds. Won’t do it again.
Regards, Peter
Finally something went in perfect the first timeTed
View attachment 449486
Like Johan said no apologies needed here Peter. From the deck down mine was absolutely as per plan (Ha! with the exceptions of my foul-ups).My excuses, Johan. But also to Daniel. For pointing yours and Daniel’s as build-to-instruction.
Finally something went in perfect the first timeTed
View attachment 44948
Are the plans accurate enough for scaling. (Definitely verboten in my field of aircraft and construction.).
Maybe I'm looking for an easy way out when what I need is some trial and error experience.
The opening in deck sheet #127 will need to be directly over part 121 with their corresponding openings otherwise piece # 64 especially on the port side will not set down. This is why it is paramount you find the centerline as described by Johan and line up pcs 118-121 as well as the mast steps and all other deck penetrations.When I temp install main deck beam 126-11 and sight down it appears that part 121, figure 11, is1-2mm too far to starboard. If I am understanding figure p7, sheet 8-3 correctly the post from the geaar setup mounts into or on top of part 121.
Thank you. I moved part 121 over an into alignment. I will get the parts that penetrate out and check alignment as I install the deck beams (purlins?).The opening in deck sheet #127 will need to be directly over part 121 with their corresponding openings otherwise piece # 64 especially on the port side will not set down. This is why it is paramount you find the centerline as described by Johan and line up pcs 118-121 as well as the mast steps and all other deck penetrations.
Dry fitting was a must for me, and I still had to pull out my needle files for a little cutting here and there. For example, not only does piece # 64 need to hit two openings but it also has to sit plumb to the deck.
I found that part 62 also has a 3mm post but the corresponding (purlin) beam over head has smaller notches. Should these be enlarged at this point or should I wait until later for better accuracy. It seems that if the notch in the beam was larger than 3mm it will not show on the finished model but assure alignment with the lower level.What I did installing the deck beams was copying other builders...
I numbered all deck beams, 126-01, 126-02, etc, and pencil-marked the centerline of each beam. Next I marked the centerline of the keel, by drilling a small hole, dia 0,6mm, at both bow and stern and strung a thin line between to nails, inserted in the two pre-drilled holes. The line then was used the center the beams. This procedure can also be used for the below deck's beams.
Secondly, all parts for the bits and Samson posts should be centered at the keel's centerline as well. If you marked the keel's centerline with a line and the centerline of part 121, it's ever so easy to make sure part 121 is centered. (This also applies for the mast feet.)
Unfortunately, accuracy will yield the best results. Worse yet, unattended errors will create havoc in the next steps of your build.
Make use of every trick in the box to ensure your build is as close to specs as you can get it, dry fitting parts (pre-printed decks for instance) is very enlightening.
Waiting for your next update...I take that back about the notches on 126-56
Ted