Hi Paul convinced you can.Just wonderful Maarten! Thank you for taking us on the journey with you. You made us almost feel like we could do it too!
Hi Paul convinced you can.Just wonderful Maarten! Thank you for taking us on the journey with you. You made us almost feel like we could do it too!
Hi Jim,Please do bother us with photos of the second one (if this is not too much ask ) I love those become live step by step. Will you add diluted bitumen Juda to visualise\deepen the dimples?
Good afternoon Maarten. Bravo. What a wonderful log about your carving of the Hoekman. Brilliantly executed Maarten. Cheers GrantThe first Hoekman is finished except for some brushing and buffing which I will do at home.
The second layer of hair is added and I fine tuned his body to give him more waist. His shoulders are lower and his chest is reduced. The lower and upper consoles will be cut when he is fitted on the ship.
The statue is all cut with chisels except for a slot between his legs and the top of his head which were done with a rotary bit.
See below.
View attachment 390548
View attachment 390543View attachment 390544View attachment 390545View attachment 390546View attachment 390547
I won t bother you with cutting the second one
Hello Maarten,Thx gents again for comments and likes.
And although work on the second hoekman is going on in the background I am back in my workshop and continue with the hull.
After a lot of the hull design tutorials of @Waldemar I decided to do a little fine tuning on my main frame design and came up with the following design in blue compared to the prevous in black.
View attachment 392203
If I project this on a 3D sonar scan of the wreck it perfectly fits.
View attachment 392204
And below in blue comparing with the ralamb fluyt which seems to have far less tumble home then the ghost ship but is of a slightly later period.
View attachment 392202
The new main frame design now allows me to continue with the first floor and bilge frame to continue on the 3 bilge planks of the ship.
I also found data of a new wreck in Dutch waters which is mentioned as a straatsvaarder, which means a ship sailing to the mediterranean typpically a fluyt.
This ship seems to have a complete flat bottom.
Oostvoornse Meer 8 (OVM 8), Netherlands - 3D model by waterduvel
South of the port of Rotterdam lies a lake which used to be the river outlet of the Brielse Maas. This was the main shipping lane to the port of Rotterdam from the 13th until the 18th century. In 2014, the Dutch Cultural Heritage Agency (RCE), conducted an archaeological assessment of the OVM 8...sketchfab.com
So I will keep the flat bottom for my hull.
Yes, the sharp edge is a common part of the design of a lot off shell first hulls. I want to experiment with this so put it into my design. I think it will also help me to close the first bilge plank around the bow. We will see.Hello Maarten,
Two questions, based on your sketches:
1) Will you corner the sharp edge between the hold's plane and the R=1/4W?
2) How will you configure the hold's plane and the rebate in the keel? I've seen examples where the garboards are angled to meet the rebate in the keel:
View attachment 392211
, thanks for your reply.Yes, the sharp edge is a common part of the design of a lot off shell first hulls. I want to experiment with this so put it into my design. I think it will also help me to close the first bilge plank around the bow. We will see.
My garboard stroke is already angled creating space for the pumps, but I don t draw this as it is not controlled by the frames but by the rabbet.
I am curious which discussion you found, most probably Waldemar s. The radii used are not fixed by rules. I used the radii which fitted my design which came from the wreck drawings except for the lower hull which is sunken into the sea bed., thanks for your reply.
In the mean time, I'm still curious about the frame radii you used, as I came across another discussion on this particular topic, but I'm having difficulty tracing back what and where. To be continued
If I recall correctly it was Hoving comparing Witsen's publication with the publication of a French author. It might take me a while; there's so much (conflicting) information floating about...I am curious which discussion you found, most probably Waldemar s. The radii used are not fixed by rules. I used the radii which fitted my design which came from the wreck drawings except for the lower hull which is sunken into the sea bed.
For this I used the ratios as mentioned by Witsen for the floor and bilge, these points are crossed by this pair of radii. Secondly I have choosen radii which have plain fractures of the vessels width, as there was no decimal system in the 17th century.
Most probably these radii were the shipwrights experience and craftmanship.
Haha, most probably because the reality is just unknown.If I recall correctly it was Hoving comparing Witsen's publication with the publication of a French author. It might take me a while; there's so much (conflicting) information floating about...