hmm.. matter of taste. An 18th century ship with a lady that looks like a cheap TikTok model..no thanks.Such a beautiful decoration, specifically the ladies, are you using the actual models to create a model?
Period figureheads reproduncing female silhouettes, when still existing or enough documented, look often grotesque and raw. Szkutnik's goddesses and nynphes are pleasantly smooth and posh.hmm.. matter of taste. An 18th century ship with a lady that looks like a cheap TikTok model..no thanks.
(sorry..just my impression)
..yes they are, and that is exactly why I think they don't fit a historic ship (again..just my opinion)Period figureheads reproduncing female silhouettes, when still existing or enough documented, look often grotesque and raw. Szkutnik's goddesses and nynphes are pleasantly smooth and posh.
In my humble opinion, given the fact that almost any ship of the line got gorgeous and exquisite carving works and figureheads, I guess that sculpture's quality could have been just a metter of money. Then why should vernacular figureheads have to be considered as the ones historically accurate? Is well knonw wealthy captains could buy themselves forniture, provisions, customize artillery, apply gold leaf here and there and even paint the ship to their own taste. So why not a beatiful piece of art on their ships' stern? I also consider that our models are going to be showed in our livings as pieces of forniture well before as accurate hystorical "documents"...yes they are, and that is exactly why I think they don't fit a historic ship (again..just my opinion)
the decorations look beautiful! But these sexyfied girls, modelled after present 'beauty standards'?.. no.
Of course..there is no right or wrong, as I said before it is a matter of taste (which is something you can not argue about).In my humble opinion, given the fact that almost any ship of the line got gorgeous and exquisite carving works and figureheads, I guess that sculpture's quality could have been just a metter of money. Then why should vernacular figureheads have to be considered as the ones historically accurate? Is well knonw whealty captains could buy themselves forniture, provisions, customize artillery, apply gold leaf here and there and even paint the ship to their taste. So why not a beatiful piece of art on their ships' stern? I also consider that our models are going to be showed in our livings as pieces of forniture well before as accurate hystorical "documents".
In this particular case I definitely quote you... . That level of explicity and even the standards of beauty do not belong to any of the past Centuries. Is altough a matter of historical accuracy more than a bad taste one.Of course..there is no right or wrong, as I said before it is a matter of taste (which is something you can not argue about).
This:...
View attachment 451595
..looks to me as something from a soft porno magazine. No way a captain in the 17-20th century would have this on his ship,
no matter the budget for carving.
Also, this is modelled after our current beauty standards.. 200 years ago these women would be considered malnourished;-)
The ornamental decorations look great, and the quality of the printing is fantastic.
Again, I don't want to be contrarian or start an argument..to my eyes it is just bad taste
@Jimsky - I don't use the actual models. My wife would be jealous. . When designing, We try to use shipyard documentation, various types of drawings and sketches from a given era of sailing ships, museum exhibits. Additionaly knowledge of history, architecture, sculpture, etc.Such a beautiful decoration, specifically the ladies, are you using the actual models to create a model?
, and yes - I agree with this, generally. Are the figures beautiful? Absolutely! Do they conform more to modern conventional beauty standards? Yes, I think so. If the Renaissance painters are to be believed, period models would have been less busty, in general, and less "fit," in a modern sense.Of course..there is no right or wrong, as I said before it is a matter of taste (which is something you can not argue about).
This:...
View attachment 451595
..looks to me as something from a soft porno magazine. No way a captain in the 17-20th century would have this on his ship,
no matter the budget for carving.
Also, this is modelled after our current beauty standards.. 200 years ago these women would be considered malnourished;-)
The ornamental decorations look great, and the quality of the printing is fantastic.
Again, I don't want to be contrarian or start an argument..to my eyes it is just bad taste
I can't say whether computer modeling is any easier than actual carving because I have no experience of the former.
... there is nothing wrong with any of the methods as long as you are comfortable, even if you purchased carved or 3D print parts, IMHO.Unfortunately, I cannot carve by hand. I have tried many times with poor results. That's why I took the easy way and started modeling on the computer.
A very interesting brickwork stove, this style I never saw before ..... is it french or british?Ahoy!
This time a 17th century GALLEY STOVE. If anyone needs for models? Please contact us by e-mail. All sizes are available.
View attachment 457239View attachment 457238View attachment 457240View attachment 457241
@Uwek - british for example sailing ship HMS TYGERA very interesting brickwork stove, this style I never saw before ..... is it french or british?