Hi Heinrich. The combinatie of the different types off wood looks great. And that oak ………lovely! Take your time.
Regards, Peter
Regards, Peter
**VIEW THREAD HERE** |
Hi Heinrich. The combinatie of the different types off wood looks great. And that oak ………lovely! Take your time.
Regards, Peter
Agreed Daniel. That does look like pine!Interesting to me (on the last Picture) that the interior planks the knees go up against look like old growth pine of a grade of #1. The flat decking strip and the rest of the timbers look like oak though.
Exactly, Paul! Have a look at the picture of the cabin's cabin.What I find interesting is the various shapes/lengths of the knees. They apparently just used the available timber to its best advantage. @Maarten has often observed that the perfection we pursue in our models just didn't exist in the real world...
Jan, note the Pine is on the model - as far as I know, pine was not used on ships. The Dutch ships were built exclusively from oak while the deck was often from "Greine wood". Oak proved too slippery for the deck. Bear in mind that the average life expectancy of a ship was fifteen years.My curiosity bone has kicked in.” Oak on Pine, Oak on Oak, Oak on ?” Expansion - Contraction, Heat - Cold, Wet - Dry. It must have been constant maintenance to keep a ship afloat.
Re-do coin? I'm sure you'll get it sorted soon Heinrich. I am coming to accept that re-do's are a pivotal aspect of ship building. Everything happens for a reason kind of thing. By re-doing a task you are invariably equipped with more knowledge - and caution perhaps - the second time around. Looking forward to those three starboard planks looking better than their port side counterparts, who are probably having a bit of a giggle at the momentGood morning, everyone. I think I am going to retire from this business, and I take up gardening. Why gardening? Well, I don't have a garden so I cannot screw that up!
I finished laying the third plank on the Port Side yesterday.
View attachment 319324
Very happy with that.
View attachment 319325
And very happy with that too,
Then I finished the same 3 planks on the Starboard side.
View attachment 319326
And when looking at this picture, I was even happier ... until I saw this total mess.
View attachment 319332
Just look at the totally uneven and undulating line that the planks follow towards the bow. The reason? Pathetic fairing of the hull on the starboard side.
View attachment 319333
The graveyard!
View attachment 319334
A familiar sight, planks ripped of because of not being happy with them, I am sure you will find that happy place where it will be looking fantastic.Good morning, everyone. I think I am going to retire from this business, and I take up gardening. Why gardening? Well, I don't have a garden so I cannot screw that up!
I finished laying the third plank on the Port Side yesterday.
View attachment 319324
Very happy with that.
View attachment 319325
And very happy with that too,
Then I finished the same 3 planks on the Starboard side.
View attachment 319326
And when looking at this picture, I was even happier ... until I saw this total mess.
View attachment 319332
Just look at the totally uneven and undulating line that the planks follow towards the bow. The reason? Pathetic fairing of the hull on the starboard side.
View attachment 319333
The graveyard!
View attachment 319334
Hello Mark. I am so angry with myself, because this time there really is no excuse. I even reminded myself after I did the boxing of the hull, that I had to RE-CHECK the fairing above the wales. When the hull is only partially boxed as is the case affect the angles on the upper part the bulkheads. This I simply neglected. I was very lucky on the Port Side and assumed the starboard side would be ok too. And we all know "Assumption is the mother of all ..."Re-do coin? I'm sure you'll get it sorted soon Heinrich. I am coming to accept that re-do's are a pivotal aspect of ship building. Everything happens for a reason kind of thing. By re-doing a task you are invariably equipped with more knowledge - and caution perhaps - the second time around. Looking forward to those three starboard planks looking better than their port side counterparts, who are probably having a bit of a giggle at the moment![]()
Jan that is what is so frustrating this time. I knew exactly what I needed to do - and then didn't do it. Now I am paying the price.View attachment 319340
Heinrich, I would consider this to be just another lesson in the build saga. I'm positive the "Re-DO" will look exceptional.
You are right Richie. It almost seems mandatory on the WB for me to first strip a section of completed planking. Last time it was three planks below the wales, now it is three above the wales. Funny thing - both on the starboard side.A familiar sight, planks ripped of because of not being happy with them, I am sure you will find that happy place where it will be looking fantastic.
Thank you for the kind words Grant. Yes, I do try to set high standards, and that is why such an omission on my part is just unforgiveable.Good morning Heinrich. I disappear for 24 hours and I need 20min reading to catch up your log.I think everyone has said it- first class work on your wales and the oak looks stunning. Better to redo than live with disappointment. You set high standards Heinrich and it reflects in your WB. Cheers Grant
Hello Heinrich, in my book I call 'finding that planking error' a good catch. I would not have known to source the problem to improper fairing, so you have provided yet another learning opportunity at least for me. I understand the concept of fairing a hull support structure, I just find it difficult to actually do it because I only have my eyes and no other way to check its accuracy aside from laying a long plank down the whole side. Then having to replicate a mirror image for the opposite side seems impossible. Thanks for sharing this episode.Good morning, everyone. I think I am going to retire from this business, and I take up gardening. Why gardening? Well, I don't have a garden so I cannot screw that up!
I finished laying the third plank on the Port Side yesterday.
View attachment 319324
Very happy with that.
View attachment 319325
And very happy with that too,
Then I finished the same 3 planks on the Starboard side.
View attachment 319326
And when looking at this picture, I was even happier ... until I saw this total mess.
View attachment 319332
Just look at the totally uneven and undulating line that the planks follow towards the bow. The reason? Pathetic fairing of the hull on the starboard side.
View attachment 319333
The graveyard!
View attachment 319334
You are so right Daniel. For some or other reason I "read" the port side easier, but this time I was happy with my fairing. However, once the filler blocks had gone, the angles of the bulkhead frames on the starboard side changed - by a very small margin, buy just enough to cause chaos. And I reminded myself beforehand to check the fairing above the wales after sanding the blocks - but then didn't do it. So, I can only be angry with myself.Hello Heinrich, in my book I call 'finding that planking error' a good catch. I would not have known to source the problem to improper fairing, so you have provided yet another learning opportunity at least for me. I understand the concept of fairing a hull support structure, I just find it difficult to actually do it because I only have my eyes and no other way to check its accuracy aside from laying a long plank down the whole side. Then having to replicate a mirror image for the opposite side seems impossible. Thanks for sharing this episode.