HIGH HOPES, WILD MEN AND THE DEVIL’S JAW - Willem Barentsz Kolderstok 1:50

Hello Heinrich, I've thoroughly enjoyed your log from this last week, especially the crow's feet interpretations ROTF. After rigging the Vasa my brain will never be the same Ha! I'm looking forward to your ratline endeavor and am excited for you on your potential visit back to your home country. By the way I am always in search of the perfect cup of coffee, it's very elusive.
Hi Daniel. Thank you for the nice words - I'm glad you enjoyed the build log. Yes, the ratlines are looming so I will see how we go on those. That perfect cup of coffee is as elusive to next "perfect" ship we are going to build! ;)
 
So on the topic of crows feet, does your ship have them attached to the mast tops as well?
View attachment 352361
These types of "laughter lines" had a different purpose. These were to prevent the topsail getting stuck under the top so they won't got damaged. But this became only common use in the second half of the 17th century on Dutch ships. Before that, the sail had an extra reinforcement in the middle bottom section.
 
These types of "laughter lines" had a different purpose. These were to prevent the topsail getting stuck under the top so they won't got damaged. But this became only common use in the second half of the 17th century on Dutch ships. Before that, the sail had an extra reinforcement in the middle bottom section.
Thank you for that, Hans. As usual it is most interesting, and all adds up to the history. I have news that I cannot wait to tell you, but I am just getting lots of ducks in their rows.
 
These types of "laughter lines" had a different purpose. These were to prevent the topsail getting stuck under the top so they won't got damaged. But this became only common use in the second half of the 17th century on Dutch ships. Before that, the sail had an extra reinforcement in the middle bottom section.
I didn't know that. Thank you for the information. It's interesting how the crows feet evolved from not being there to being there to not being there again.
 
Dear Friends

First, let me start off by wishing everyone a very Happy Chinese New Year. The admiral is with her family and I'm on my own doing what I like most - researching the Willem Barentsz. Now just as it so happened, I have a lot of information that was previously unknown to me which has now come to light. Included in this is information, is a very special model of the Ship of Barents that was built in Russia by a Russian master. I call this section of my research. The first section of this post (I have divided it in two) has already been posted on my log, but because of the size of the log, it is much easier if I just repost it again.

THE RUSSIAN CONNECTION: (PART 1)


In 1979, Russian amateur archeologist, Dmitry Kravchenko, found the wooden construction as part of a ship’s hull while searching for artifacts in and around Het Behouden Huys. He produced a drawing of his find, but because of the extremely difficult circumstances under which he had to work, it could best be described as “rudimentary”. Kravchenko left behind everything that he had found, untouched and in their exact original location and positions. Seemingly, the “discovery” then went into a thirteen-year long hiatus in which no further mention of it was made. In 1992, a Russian expedition led by Peter V. Boyarsky of the Russian Research Institute for Cultural and Natural Heritage arrived in Nova Zembla.

Interestingly, Boyarsky’s research did not focus specifically on finding artifacts connected to the WB expedition – it was a comprehensive mission (which included archeologists, ecologists, geologists and representatives of various other disciplines) – aimed at achieving a global picture of Nova Zembla which they viewed as a National Park of sorts. Be that as it may, they “re-discovered” Kravchenko’s find and deemed it significant enough to take back with them to Moscow.

微信图片_20220804212002.jpg


The discovered hull portion of Willem Barentsz's ship.

Six months later, a Dutch delegation comprising of Henk van Veen (Chairman of the Willem Barentsz National Committee), Pieter Floore (an archeologist on behalf of the Institute for Pre-and Proto History of the University of Amsterdam) and Ab Hoving (on behalf of the Rijksmuseum) traveled to Moscow in an attempt to determine whether this “wooden construction” was indeed part of the ship of Barentsz.

微信图片_20220807215050.jpg


A drawing of the discovered hull portion by the Boyarsky Group.

And this my friends, is where the Dutch involvement as far as research of the WB goes, comes to a halt. In his book, Ab mentions plans for a third expedition to return, but also hastens to add that up to that point a third attempt has only remained a dream.
 
RUSSIAN CONNECTION PART 2:

A group of Russian scientists this week leaves for Novaya Zemlya to search for Willem Barentsz’ ship (NAME MENTIONED).
By
Trude Pettersen
September 26, 2012

VESTI and the Barents' Observer​

3.jpg


Well, the third expedition did eventually happen in 2012, but not through any doing of the Dutch. Once again, it was left to Russian explorers to find Barentsz's ship.

The scientists will leave Arkhangelsk on September 28 and sail for the Arctic archipelago of Novaya Zemlya to search for the legendary ship. “The aim of the expedition is not to raise the vessel, but to collect artifacts: cannons, cannonballs, anchor and weapons”, says Igor Ymelyanov, who will join the expedition as journalist and filmmaker, Vesti reports.

The expedition is led by a full member of the Russian Geographical Society - Historian and Arctic researcher, Dmitry Kravchenko. (Yes, the same Kravchenko who found the original parts of the ship in 1979. "Kravchenko is nothing short of a northern polar navigator!", says Igor Emelyanov.

Willem Barentsz stranded with his vessel and a crew of 16 persons on Novaya Zemlya on July 17 1596 in an attempt to sail through the Northeast Passage. After having spent nearly a year trapped in ice, Barentsz and his crew tried to escape from Novaya Zemlya on two small boats. Barentsz himself died only seven days after starting out. The 12 surviving crew members were rescued by a Russian vessel nearly two months later.
The wooden lodge where Barentsz’ crew sheltered during the year spent on Novaya was found undisturbed by Norwegian seal hunter Elling Carlsen in 1871.

So far nobody has managed to find Barentsz’ vessel (NAME MENTIONED).

Part 3 of the Russian Connection will deal with the results / findings of the expedition.
 
RUSSIAN CONNECTION (PART 3)

Unique artifacts transferred to the Arkhangelsk Regional Museum of Local Lore
Author: Project Press Secretary Aigul Bakiyeva


On the very last day of work, the expeditioners found four fragments of frames of the bottom part of Willem Barents's vessel.

On October 21, Dmitry Kravchenko's search expedition on the Ship Aldan returned to Arkhangelsk. The expedition, which included underwater archaeologists, divers and hydroacoustics, geophysicists and employees of the Russian Arctic Park, spent a month on the territory of the Russian Arctic National Park in the Ice Harbor Bay, near Cape Sporey Navolok. The purpose of the expedition was to confirm with the help of special instruments the presence of a natural geomagnetic anomaly a few meters from the shore, and to convince the scientific community that this anomaly is nothing else than part of the skeleton of the vessel of the Dutch skipper Willem Barents. Underwater archaeologist, historian, Dmitry Kravchenko has been looking for the famous Dutch ship for several decades. In 2012, the expedition entitled “The North is Ours!” was received financial assistance from the Russian Geographical Society and the Foundation for assistance to the northern and Arctic territories.

Dmitry Kravchenko: "The expedition faced an insurmountable challenge working against us – the elements. Snow drifts, wind up to 30 m / s, surge waves near the shore, and negative temperatures meant that we could not fully realize our plans. For example, due to the strong waves, it became more and more difficult to work with the magnetometer and side-scan sonar, which failed and gave erroneous readings. We had planned 11 studies, but we lost almost a full five days. However, luck still smiled on us: almost on the last day of work, we found 4 fragments of frames at the water's edge. And most importantly - they belonged to the bottom of Barents’s ship! Sections of each of the four fragments have been removed from the ocean bed and will be studied using radiocarbon analysis at the Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences."

Dmitry Kravchenko does not doubt for one second that the wooden fragments belong to the Dutch vessel. His arguments in favor of the articles founds being of Dutch origin are two-fold: Their composition is clearly from a deciduous tree - most likely oak. The Pomors of the region did not build their Kochi and Karbas from oak, it simply did not exist in the north. In addition, the method of fixing the nails and the nails themselves, according to Kravchenko, also testify to the Dutch origin of the artefacts.

Now the finds have been transferred to the Arkhangelsk Regional Museum of Local Lore. In total, the Kravchenko expedition transferred more than two thousand fragments of artifacts (weapons, tools, dishes, fabric, shoes, ceramics) belonging to the Dutch expedition of 1596-97 to the museum's funds. The historian's dream is to reconstruct the Barents’s vessel. The main conclusion that the expedition made after working in the Ice Harbor is that the vessel will not be found in the place where it was previously assumed to be.

"The fragments we have found were part of the frames (in all likelihood, the futtocks) at the bottom of the vessel. Due to their negative buoyancy, they will not be far from where the rest of the hull resides. Previously, we relied only on instrument readings to provide us with an approximate location, but now It turns out that our recent observations have given us a very good idea where the remains of the vessel lie.

Next year, we will start the expedition earlier in the year and our goals will be to detect the remains of the ship, determine the condition of the keel, and calculate the percentage of erosion that took place. Whether or not to raise the ship in the event of its detection, is still an open question. The director of the park, "Russian Arctic", Roman Ershov, suggested not to rush into this sensitive issue and to conduct only photo and video shooting to document the presence of a caravel at the bottom of the ocean. "We do not know how the hull components, which have been lying at the bottom for several centuries, will react," Roman Ershov explained his position. He thanked the participants of the expedition for their work in the Russian Arctic Park and the finds provided to the museum.
 
Fascinating!
I am glad you think so, Paul. This is a very important part of the research to me as the Dutch researchers remained completely stagnant as far as the WB goes. On the contrary the Russians continued the research and these four futtock frames that were discovered would play an instrumental role is determining the size of the ship and more importantly, the shape of the hull.
 
Interesting Heinrich, has it been 10 or 11 years since the results of the third expedition were published? I just want to be certain of the timeline here.
The last sentence of your narrative talks about "Next year we will start the expedition earlier".
 
Interesting Heinrich, has it been 10 or 11 years since the results of the third expedition were published? I just want to be certain of the timeline here.
The last sentence of your narrative talks about "Next year we will start the expedition earlier".
Absolutely correct Daniel - this discovery/expedition was in 2012. This is what makes the research difficult. I was only able to find this information 11 years after the fact, so I have no idea whether there were also other expeditions that had taken place in the meantime.
 
E
RUSSIAN CONNECTION (PART 3)

Unique artifacts transferred to the Arkhangelsk Regional Museum of Local Lore
Author: Project Press Secretary Aigul Bakiyeva


On the very last day of work, the expeditioners found four fragments of frames of the bottom part of Willem Barents's vessel.

On October 21, Dmitry Kravchenko's search expedition on the Ship Aldan returned to Arkhangelsk. The expedition, which included underwater archaeologists, divers and hydroacoustics, geophysicists and employees of the Russian Arctic Park, spent a month on the territory of the Russian Arctic National Park in the Ice Harbor Bay, near Cape Sporey Navolok. The purpose of the expedition was to confirm with the help of special instruments the presence of a natural geomagnetic anomaly a few meters from the shore, and to convince the scientific community that this anomaly is nothing else than part of the skeleton of the vessel of the Dutch skipper Willem Barents. Underwater archaeologist, historian, Dmitry Kravchenko has been looking for the famous Dutch ship for several decades. In 2012, the expedition entitled “The North is Ours!” was received financial assistance from the Russian Geographical Society and the Foundation for assistance to the northern and Arctic territories.

Dmitry Kravchenko: "The expedition faced an insurmountable challenge working against us – the elements. Snow drifts, wind up to 30 m / s, surge waves near the shore, and negative temperatures meant that we could not fully realize our plans. For example, due to the strong waves, it became more and more difficult to work with the magnetometer and side-scan sonar, which failed and gave erroneous readings. We had planned 11 studies, but we lost almost a full five days. However, luck still smiled on us: almost on the last day of work, we found 4 fragments of frames at the water's edge. And most importantly - they belonged to the bottom of Barents’s ship! Sections of each of the four fragments have been removed from the ocean bed and will be studied using radiocarbon analysis at the Geological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences."

Dmitry Kravchenko does not doubt for one second that the wooden fragments belong to the Dutch vessel. His arguments in favor of the articles founds being of Dutch origin are two-fold: Their composition is clearly from a deciduous tree - most likely oak. The Pomors of the region did not build their Kochi and Karbas from oak, it simply did not exist in the north. In addition, the method of fixing the nails and the nails themselves, according to Kravchenko, also testify to the Dutch origin of the artefacts.

Now the finds have been transferred to the Arkhangelsk Regional Museum of Local Lore. In total, the Kravchenko expedition transferred more than two thousand fragments of artifacts (weapons, tools, dishes, fabric, shoes, ceramics) belonging to the Dutch expedition of 1596-97 to the museum's funds. The historian's dream is to reconstruct the Barents’s vessel. The main conclusion that the expedition made after working in the Ice Harbor is that the vessel will not be found in the place where it was previously assumed to be.

"The fragments we have found were part of the frames (in all likelihood, the futtocks) at the bottom of the vessel. Due to their negative buoyancy, they will not be far from where the rest of the hull resides. Previously, we relied only on instrument readings to provide us with an approximate location, but now It turns out that our recent observations have given us a very good idea where the remains of the vessel lie.

Next year, we will start the expedition earlier in the year and our goals will be to detect the remains of the ship, determine the condition of the keel, and calculate the percentage of erosion that took place. Whether or not to raise the ship in the event of its detection, is still an open question. The director of the park, "Russian Arctic", Roman Ershov, suggested not to rush into this sensitive issue and to conduct only photo and video shooting to document the presence of a caravel at the bottom of the ocean. "We do not know how the hull components, which have been lying at the bottom for several centuries, will react," Roman Ershov explained his position. He thanked the participants of the expedition for their work in the Russian Arctic Park and the finds provided to the museum.
Excuse my ignorance, but why are the Russians so interested in this Dutch ship?
 
E

Excuse my ignorance, but why are the Russians so interested in this Dutch ship?
Hi Jack. That is an excellent question for which no apologies are needed. Actually, I have wondered about this myself. For sure there is the geographical fact that Nova Zembla (Novaya Zemlaya in Russian) belongs to Russia and thus we can explain the Russian interest from that angle. But there seems to be something more afoot here. The Russians seems to have an enormous affinity towards Willem Barentsz as a historical figure - regularly citing his feats of courage and fearlessness in combination with his pioneering spirit.

Conversely, one can also ask the question why the Dutch seem to have so little interest in their own maritime history. They showed great interest in Het Behouden Huys (the house where Barentsz and his crew spent the winter) - the great number of artefacts in Het Behouden Huys Museum Tercshelling and the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam bear testimony to this - but little interest in Barentsz's ship. So little, that they do not even know the name of the ship.
 
Back
Top