- Joined
- Oct 17, 2020
- Messages
- 1,444
- Points
- 393
Hi Enrico, see MPI absolutely agree, Paul. It is so nice to have someone to share the whole process with. That lends a dimension to the build that I wouldn't change for anything in the world.
Hi Enrico, see MPI absolutely agree, Paul. It is so nice to have someone to share the whole process with. That lends a dimension to the build that I wouldn't change for anything in the world.
Thank you very much, Frank! That is a most informative source!Hi Enrico, see MP
Don't know you well enough, but I think your Admiral is way too good for you.I agree. She is taking the rigging very seriously and is a stickler for detail. She has already told me though that the next build has to be in a considerably bigger scale so that I wouldn't need her help and could do everything myself!
Absolutely correct Dean. On Frank's second illustration it is very clear that the correct way is not like the instructions. I think my first comment was merely based on a misunderstanding of Frank's first response.For clarification...
View attachment 354966
Rigging instructions you said you are going to follow above...
View attachment 354968
Franks suggestion above...not like the instructions either
No worries, I was just trying to make clear to you the options, and the pros and cons of each.Absolutely correct Dean. On Frank's second illustration it is very clear that the correct way is not like the instructions. I think my first comment was merely based on a misunderstanding of Frank's first response.
I couldn't agree more Johan. She deserves far better!Don't know you well enough, but I think your Admiral is way too good for you.
You should cater her to every whim...
I agree fully, Dean. Thank you for pointing out my misinterpretation.No worries, I was just trying to make clear to you the options, and the pros and cons of each.
It is usually not feasible to do it as Frank has shown, and thus the common method is what I showed (that is a compromise at scale) yet still yields a nice end result. I am sure whatever you choose will be done well by your better half!
Ps - as you know, I don’t think there is a right or wrong way…just the builders way!
Good evening, the images I post are only to clarify how the details are in real life, each model maker does what he likes best. Precise, before I made some observations and they weren't good now I also avoid some images. Good evening FrankNo worries, I was just trying to make clear to you the options, and the pros and cons of each.
It is usually not feasible to do it as Frank has shown, and thus the common method is what I showed (that is a compromise at scale) yet still yields a nice end result. I am sure whatever you choose will be done well by your better half!
Ps - as you know, I don’t think there is a right or wrong way…just the builders way!
Frank, I am very glad that you posted the pictures and appreciate it. That gives me a goal to strive for, and more importantly, shows the historically correct and accurate way of doing things. For about half of the ratlines, I would be able to do it like that, but then I am going to run out of space the higher I go.Good evening, the images I post are only to clarify how the details are in real life, each model maker does what he likes best. Precise, before I made some observations and they weren't good now I also avoid some images. Good evening Frank
I agree, the information provided by Frank is good and accurate. Grazie Frank!Frank, I am very glad that you posted the pictures and appreciate it. That gives me a goal to strive for, and more importantly, shows the historically correct and accurate way of doing things. For about half of the ratlines, I would be able to do it like that, but then I am going to run out of space the higher I go.
Please keep on posting EXACTLY in the same way that you have done before.
Frank, sono molto contento che tu abbia pubblicato le foto e le apprezzi. Questo mi dà un obiettivo per cui lottare e, cosa più importante, mostra il modo storicamente corretto e accurato di fare le cose. Per circa la metà delle ratline, sarei in grado di farlo in questo modo, ma poi finirò lo spazio più in alto vado.
Per favore continua a pubblicare ESATTAMENTE nello stesso modo in cui hai fatto prima.
An excellent question, I run into this way too often!A curiosity question. I can see that there would be splices in smaller and larger ropes (blue circle) but how is the smaller rope free end tied off.
View attachment 354971
Jan
Interesting model. What confounds me, however is the Bowsprit. Was it common in that time period to have the bowsprit unmasted?Now it is, of course, very interesting to compare the existing drawings/plans that I have of the WB to those of the Russian model builders.
Let's just look at the top views of the hull shapes.
View attachment 354398
Hoving
View attachment 354399
De Weerdt
Let's compare the above two Dutch versions to the Russian interpretations.
View attachment 354400
Captain Naumenkov
View attachment 354401
Half-Breadth drawing by Vladislav Zhdan.
You will see that the Russian drawings show a much wider hull amidships than the Dutch ones. And even here, the puzzle makes sense. You will recall that the 2012 expedition salvaged 4 frame parts of the ship (probably from what I can gather) the futtocks.
View attachment 354406
The above frame is borrowed from my Bluenose box, the futtocks are indicated by the black lines.
Now let us assume that these futtock parts were in actual fact longer than originally thought, that would explain the wider hull amidships. Also, we are no longer talking about a ship of 30 last, but of 50.
And this is another Russian interpretation of a full POF build of the Mercurius. (Unfortunately, I do not know the name of the modeler, nor do I have any other information about him.
View attachment 354412
View attachment 354413
View attachment 354414
View attachment 354415
View attachment 354900
The Admiral scrutinizing the job at hand. This picture also gives you a good indication of the size of the WB - she is tiny!
And do it at scale!!View attachment 354974
Jan and Dan, @Daniel20 & @Pathfinder65
I think the clue is what Frank showed... illustration 7 -10.
Now imagine serving the eye at each end, and then tying the eye to the shroud with a smaller rope and tying it as shown above! Then do that a thousand or more times on a war ship! That would be commendable!