HIGH HOPES, WILD MEN AND THE DEVIL’S JAW - Willem Barentsz Kolderstok 1:50

I agree. She is taking the rigging very seriously and is a stickler for detail. She has already told me though that the next build has to be in a considerably bigger scale so that I wouldn't need her help and could do everything myself! ROTF
Don't know you well enough, but I think your Admiral is way too good for you.
You should cater her to every whim...
 
rat lines.JPG
above is the technique I showed you

1675273555585.png

Above is the example you showed, and claimed was like Franks suggestion... :p

Looks exactly like what I showed you!

1675273679782.png

Above is Franks suggestion, like an actual ship was done...

Screenshot 2023-02-01 113601.jpg

Instructions you showed, not like Franks suggestion or mine. Note the smaller rope wrapped around the line inside of the shroud.

In conclusion,
I am not sure which way you deem is the right way, but it's your ship. I only showed a common way of doing them, which is used by many. ;)
 
Last edited:
For clarification...
Screenshot 2023-02-01 113601.jpg

Rigging instructions you said you are going to follow above...

1675274466606.png

Franks suggestion above...not like the instructions either!
The rope is made into an eye and served. Then it is tied to the shroud. Very labor intensive method, easier done on a large scale model.
 
Last edited:
Hi Dean. If I have not expressed myself well/clearly, I apologize. The correct way is obviously the way that Frank showed in his first and later two pictures. I asked Frank if the Kolderstok instructions were the same as his and he replied in the affirmative. The Zhdan version (in the actual photograph) may well be exactly like yours - in fact, now that I have looked again, I agree with you.

I will probably use the version as shown in the Kolderstok instructions or your suggestion. I will test both and see which one looks the best and is the most feasible. As I mentioned to Frank, I am going to run out of space near the mast tops if I try to follow the "correct" way.

Once again, my apologies If I have been unclear.
 
For clarification...
View attachment 354966

Rigging instructions you said you are going to follow above...

View attachment 354968

Franks suggestion above...not like the instructions either
Absolutely correct Dean. On Frank's second illustration it is very clear that the correct way is not like the instructions. I think my first comment was merely based on a misunderstanding of Frank's first response.
 
Absolutely correct Dean. On Frank's second illustration it is very clear that the correct way is not like the instructions. I think my first comment was merely based on a misunderstanding of Frank's first response.
No worries, I was just trying to make clear to you the options, and the pros and cons of each.
It is usually not feasible to do it as Frank has shown, and thus the common method is what I showed (that is a compromise at scale) yet still yields a nice end result. I am sure whatever you choose will be done well by your better half! ;)

Ps - as you know, I don’t think there is a right or wrong way…just the builders way! :p
 
Don't know you well enough, but I think your Admiral is way too good for you.
You should cater her to every whim...
I couldn't agree more Johan. She deserves far better!

Makes me think of a true story in my life when I was a first grader. My father was a manager at the then Trust Bank in South Africa (@GrantTyler ; @Nomad Grant and Mark may recall the good ole days of Jan Marais and Trust Bank) and he got given a Mercedes-Benz as a fringe benefit. Our next-door neighbor's son (same age as me) always used to catch a lift with me and my father to school in the mornings (on my father's way to work) and then his mother would pick us up from school in the afternoon. During the first week after my father was driving the MB, my next-door friend remarked to me that the only way we could be driving a Mercedes-Benz was by being given one.

Now you know what they say about youngsters - from the mouth of a child, you will often hear the truth (uit de mond van de suigeling ...). Obviously, this was something that came from his parents. When I mentioned this to my father (a dry-witted man who sometimes produced some gems), he smiled and responded as follows:

"That is true my son. I cannot afford a Mercedes-Benz, but at least my work thinks I am good enough to give me one." ;)
 
No worries, I was just trying to make clear to you the options, and the pros and cons of each.
It is usually not feasible to do it as Frank has shown, and thus the common method is what I showed (that is a compromise at scale) yet still yields a nice end result. I am sure whatever you choose will be done well by your better half! ;)

Ps - as you know, I don’t think there is a right or wrong way…just the builders way! :p
I agree fully, Dean. Thank you for pointing out my misinterpretation. Thumbsup
 
No worries, I was just trying to make clear to you the options, and the pros and cons of each.
It is usually not feasible to do it as Frank has shown, and thus the common method is what I showed (that is a compromise at scale) yet still yields a nice end result. I am sure whatever you choose will be done well by your better half! ;)

Ps - as you know, I don’t think there is a right or wrong way…just the builders way! :p
Good evening, the images I post are only to clarify how the details are in real life, each model maker does what he likes best. Precise, before I made some observations and they weren't good now I also avoid some images. Good evening Frank
 
Good evening, the images I post are only to clarify how the details are in real life, each model maker does what he likes best. Precise, before I made some observations and they weren't good now I also avoid some images. Good evening Frank
Frank, I am very glad that you posted the pictures and appreciate it. That gives me a goal to strive for, and more importantly, shows the historically correct and accurate way of doing things. For about half of the ratlines, I would be able to do it like that, but then I am going to run out of space the higher I go.

Please keep on posting EXACTLY in the same way that you have done before. :)

Frank, sono molto contento che tu abbia pubblicato le foto e le apprezzi. Questo mi dà un obiettivo per cui lottare e, cosa più importante, mostra il modo storicamente corretto e accurato di fare le cose. Per circa la metà delle ratline, sarei in grado di farlo in questo modo, ma poi finirò lo spazio più in alto vado.

Per favore continua a pubblicare ESATTAMENTE nello stesso modo in cui hai fatto prima. :)
 
Frank, I am very glad that you posted the pictures and appreciate it. That gives me a goal to strive for, and more importantly, shows the historically correct and accurate way of doing things. For about half of the ratlines, I would be able to do it like that, but then I am going to run out of space the higher I go.

Please keep on posting EXACTLY in the same way that you have done before. :)

Frank, sono molto contento che tu abbia pubblicato le foto e le apprezzi. Questo mi dà un obiettivo per cui lottare e, cosa più importante, mostra il modo storicamente corretto e accurato di fare le cose. Per circa la metà delle ratline, sarei in grado di farlo in questo modo, ma poi finirò lo spazio più in alto vado.

Per favore continua a pubblicare ESATTAMENTE nello stesso modo in cui hai fatto prima. :)
I agree, the information provided by Frank is good and accurate. Grazie Frank!
It is always good to know how things were actually done, and if feasible to duplicate that as best as possible. But on a model, at scale some of the tiny ropes and blocks (and how they were served) can be a real challenge. Who actually serves a rope back onto itself to make an eye? I have seen it, but very few do it. So often a representation of what was done is sufficient.
But as always, it is the builder who decides which path to take, based on feasibility and personal skill set. ;)

What I will never agree with, is imposed goals and standards set by one builder upon another builder. Because we all have different goals and skills. So it is never bad to show how things were done historically for educational purposes. But that should never be forced upon a builder, as what they have to do on their model. ;)
 
Last edited:
Now it is, of course, very interesting to compare the existing drawings/plans that I have of the WB to those of the Russian model builders.

Let's just look at the top views of the hull shapes.

View attachment 354398
Hoving

View attachment 354399
De Weerdt

Let's compare the above two Dutch versions to the Russian interpretations.

View attachment 354400
Captain Naumenkov

View attachment 354401
Half-Breadth drawing by Vladislav Zhdan.

You will see that the Russian drawings show a much wider hull amidships than the Dutch ones. And even here, the puzzle makes sense. You will recall that the 2012 expedition salvaged 4 frame parts of the ship (probably from what I can gather) the futtocks.

View attachment 354406
The above frame is borrowed from my Bluenose box, the futtocks are indicated by the black lines.

Now let us assume that these futtock parts were in actual fact longer than originally thought, that would explain the wider hull amidships. Also, we are no longer talking about a ship of 30 last, but of 50.

And this is another Russian interpretation of a full POF build of the Mercurius. (Unfortunately, I do not know the name of the modeler, nor do I have any other information about him.

View attachment 354412
View attachment 354413
View attachment 354414
View attachment 354415
Interesting model. What confounds me, however is the Bowsprit. Was it common in that time period to have the bowsprit unmasted?
 
View attachment 354974

Jan and Dan, @Daniel20 & @Pathfinder65

I think the clue is what Frank showed... illustration 7 -10.
Now imagine serving the eye at each end, and then tying the eye to the shroud with a smaller rope and tying it as shown above! Then do that a thousand or more times on a war ship! That would be commendable! ;)
And do it at scale!!
 
Back
Top