Not a chance.I did say “And counting” no avoiding the spotlight.
Paul, I'd certainly like to follow your new build even though the workmanship and nautical terms will fly straight over me head. Best of luck I will lurkIn January of 1766 the Royal Navy ordered two ships to be built conforming to a new design developed by the Surveyor of the Navy, Sir John Williams. The first of these was launched in November 1767 (Swan) and the second (Kingfisher) was launched in July of 1770 (but not completed until November 1770). As a curiosity many English records show the name of this second ship as Kings Fisher (or Kingsfisher).
Twenty-three more ships were ordered to the same design between 1773 and 1779. You are probably familiar with some of them: Fly, Pegasus, Swift (Vulture, Atalanta, Thorn) as they have appeared on this forum and others as kit or scratch builds.
Swan-class sloops were rated at 14 guns though from the very beginning they were designed with 16 gunports. In time, the additional two guns were added but the nominal rating was left unchanged.
Swan-class sloops were the ‘standard’ ship design of the British Navy during the American Revolutionary War during which eleven of them were lost (including Kingfisher). Surviving vessels went on to serve during the French Revolutionary War and the Napoleonic War.
It is necessary to identify this ship as the Kingfisher 1770 because there are at least 13 additional ships of this name listed in the records of the Royal Navy. There is even a Kingfisher class of ship built during the 20th century.
The Kingfisher 1770 was built by master shipwright Joseph Harris at the Chatham Dockyard, sailed for America in August of 1771, and notably participated in the blockade of Delaware Harbor and the Battle of Turtle Gut Inlet. She was burned by her own crew to avoid capture (by the French) on 7 August 1778 in Narragansett Bay during the Battle of Rhode Island.
Here are her vitals:
Wikipedia says this: The Swan class sloops were unusually attractive for the type of vessel. Not only did they have sleek hull lines, but they also carried an unusual amount of decoration for their size. They were built just before the Admiralty issued orders that all vessels (especially lesser rates and unrated vessels) should have minimal decoration and carvings to save on costs.
- Length: 96 ft 8 ½ in (29.5 m) (gundeck), 78 ft 10 ½ in (24.0 m) (keel)
- Beam: 26 ft 10 in (8.2 m)
- Depth of hold: 12 ft 10 in (3.91 m)
- Tons burthen: 302 bm
- Complement: 125
- Armament: 14x 6 Pound Guns, 16x ½ Pound Swivel Guns
View attachment 348679
View attachment 348680
Attribution: Painting. [Model of HMS] KINGFISHER, Sloop 14 Guns. Model made by Joseph Williams; Painting by Josh Marshall - 1775. Oil on panel in gilt frame. Perspective paintings at 45 degree angle from Navy Board original plans. Commissioned by King George III as part of a series of paired bow and stern paintings of British warship models, one example of each class of ship in the naval establishment.
Construction will begin in a few weeks. I have been reorganizing my workspace, reading everything I can find on swan class ships, ordering supplies to supplement the build, and adding some needed tools to my workshop.
You are all welcome to pull up a chair and join me on this multi-year project. It's going to be a blast!
Welcome Peter!There is no plank glued, not 1 drop of glue spilled and we are allready on page 3 of this topic. The bar is open!
I must say your Vasa is a masterpiece and I'm sure this "saved" Kingfisher kit of LSS will be another one. Good luck Paul and count me in.
I would have waited for you...Hello Paul! I've been running down the dock and just jumped aboard your build here before she takes off. I'm excited and looking forward to watching your new build. I know you will enjoy this, especially at 1:48.
Enjoy the lurking! I hope to provide something worth looking at.Paul, I'd certainly like to follow your new build even though the workmanship and nautical terms will fly straight over me head. Best of luck I will lurk
Yes. Largely unobtainable. I was fortunate I think...Well Paul, just a matter of time before you started a new "affair" with pretty ship class. If I were to build a kit, one of Bob's would rank very high on my list. Albeit, they are unobtainable. I am looking forward, to seeing you put the Paul signature on an already first class kit, AND in Boxwood. I'm on board mate!
Glad to have you here Vic!Following with baited (bated?) breath.
Hmm... no pressure would be good. Perhaps if I completely botch the first few steps people will quit me and I can work quietly in obscurity. In truth this is all just a hobby for me so I can live with disappointing the followers, but I'll try not to.33 followers and you haven't struck a bat yet Paul
No pressure ......
Kind Regards
Nigel
Looking forward to benefitting from your guidance, Ted. For folks who have not seen Ted's magnificent Kingfisher:Looks like you've generated a lot of interest Paul!
So pleased another of Bob's Kingfisher has been started - welcome to the club.
Ted
LSS now provides tutorials and such. I'm told they are excellent though I have no first-hand knowledge.Ignorant me, I've never heard of Lauck Street Shipyard, but I have heard of the Kingfisher. I can't wait to see your version of this beautiful sloop! Good Luck, & I wish you the best in this new year! Rick1011
You must get ready, you never know what gonna happenedAs we all gather with our chairs, including Jim’s @Jimsky portable one, this is like the “Kattner Conference” but the Speaker has yet to turn up .
We don't buy those excuses, and don't give credits upfront!As I have studied this LSS kit more soberly I've come to realize that it is really just a starter kit for a scratch build. I don't mean this is a negative sense - but this is not a kit in the same way that some of the recent high-end kits coming out of the east are. While I don't need to trace out frames and cut them from dimensional stock - everything after that looks and feels like a scratch build. This kit is a set-up for a true craftsman style build. I'm rather happy with this as it affords me the opportunity of a rich learning experience in a controlled environment.
Don't worry, we are only on page 3 of your build log. Oh...BTW, we don't limit pages per single log...Bottom line: I need to spend a bit more time studying the workflow (techniques and practices) of a scratch-built model...