Sovereign of the Seas - Sergal 1:78 (with hopefully many added details)

Hey John, seems strange to be sorting out the stern at this late stage. Care to share your strategy??? Or maybe I misunderstand the proper workflow being new to this... Is this a product of revisiting something previously completed?
 
Hi all,
Minor starting area of pending work - I new that not following the kit's rounded stern tuck would poss. create later issues. Well they've arrived.
Need to really stress about this - could end up making a mess. Anyway here are some just starting preliminary FYI - images - As always thanks so much for dropping by....

View attachment 317735View attachment 317736View attachment 317737View attachment 317738View attachment 317739
Good morning John. Incredibly high modeling standards being set here. Your redo of beautiful gratings is a confirmation of this- respect. Cheers Grant
 
Daniel, Heinrich: thanks for your votes of confidence mates. – I’m actually enjoying the challenge that this has created (but the frustrations not as well).

Grant: as always thanks for your kind remarks…

Paul; No this area is not a revisit. I “trashed” for-all-intent-and-purposes Sergal’s instructions – Totally inappropriate. First image says it all IMO – Per their instructions booklet – the entire upper section including the stern, transom, and metal decorative bits should be installed – THEN the builder is expected to flip the ship over and continue with first hull planking - Yikes!!

1.jpeg

Followed by a few more of their order of instructions

2.JPG3.JPG4.JPG

It was always my intention to bash this kit as much as possible. Stern and transom detailing were a new area of thought that was not going to follow kit’s instructions. They were going to be all scratch built in any case – kit’s instructions became moot. Here are some preliminary ideas on how I want this to look.
Work so far - windows obviously just for the images..

5.JPG6.JPG7.JPG8.JPG9.JPG

on the "to fix" list - these will be much easier lol

11.JPG

10.JPG
 
Hi John. Just saw the image you posted on Paul's build. Another great build. Looking forward to going back to the start and working through it. The image you posted on Paul's build has so many loose lines. Why is this?
 
Hi lakedaisy, Thanks for the nice thoughts.

To your specific question. For me it seemed much easier to completely rig ALL needed lines to yards (leech, clew, bunt, sheet) with sails/blocks pre-installed before attaching any of the yards to their corresponding masts. Hence the mess that you asked about. The Vasa was my first attempt at fully rigging a ship including sails. So, all guesswork on my part. Then starting with the bowsprit, I would go through and loop ropes through appropriate pin rail holes.

Followed to the foremast (starting with its lower sail - and so on. In this way since all lines and all needed blocks had been pre-installed. No need to add lines or blocks to attached yards – Then going through the mess, I went through line by line and ran them to their pin locations.

My second build with sails (complete build log here as SoS) was the Santisima cross section. For that one I also pre-attached all needed lines to easily locate the correct pins for later. Obviously a much easier build to rig, but added the pin location numbers to the lines. Here are a few images of both...

Thanks for your interest. Much appreciated.


1.jpg2.jpg3.jpg4.jpg5.jpg6.jpg7.jpg8.jpg
 
Hi lakedaisy, Thanks for the nice thoughts.

To your specific question. For me it seemed much easier to completely rig ALL needed lines to yards (leech, clew, bunt, sheet) with sails/blocks pre-installed before attaching any of the yards to their corresponding masts. Hence the mess that you asked about. The Vasa was my first attempt at fully rigging a ship including sails. So, all guesswork on my part. Then starting with the bowsprit, I would go through and loop ropes through appropriate pin rail holes.

Followed to the foremast (starting with its lower sail - and so on. In this way since all lines and all needed blocks had been pre-installed. No need to add lines or blocks to attached yards – Then going through the mess, I went through line by line and ran them to their pin locations.

My second build with sails (complete build log here as SoS) was the Santisima cross section. For that one I also pre-attached all needed lines to easily locate the correct pins for later. Obviously a much easier build to rig, but added the pin location numbers to the lines. Here are a few images of both...

Thanks for your interest. Much appreciated.


View attachment 318445View attachment 318446View attachment 318447View attachment 318449View attachment 318450View attachment 318451View attachment 318452View attachment 318453
Good morning. You build quality ships/cross section John.
 
Daniel, Heinrich: thanks for your votes of confidence mates. – I’m actually enjoying the challenge that this has created (but the frustrations not as well).

Grant: as always thanks for your kind remarks…

Paul; No this area is not a revisit. I “trashed” for-all-intent-and-purposes Sergal’s instructions – Totally inappropriate. First image says it all IMO – Per their instructions booklet – the entire upper section including the stern, transom, and metal decorative bits should be installed – THEN the builder is expected to flip the ship over and continue with first hull planking - Yikes!!

View attachment 317863

Followed by a few more of their order of instructions

View attachment 317864View attachment 317865View attachment 317866

It was always my intention to bash this kit as much as possible. Stern and transom detailing were a new area of thought that was not going to follow kit’s instructions. They were going to be all scratch built in any case – kit’s instructions became moot. Here are some preliminary ideas on how I want this to look.
Work so far - windows obviously just for the images..

View attachment 317867View attachment 317868View attachment 317869View attachment 317870View attachment 317871

on the "to fix" list - these will be much easier lol

View attachment 317873

View attachment 317872

With a little bit of jiggling with the ornaments,I wonder if it is possible to increase the height of the lower row of arches John? It is the one thing that looks a little off on this kit.If the small openings were at the top and the larger on the row below, it would make more sense aesthetically

BTW,very early untouched version of this kit currently on Ebay with super crisp castings.Shame it would cost me over £2K by the time I got it to the UK as it is in Japan:rolleyes:

Kind Regards

Nigel
 
Nigel thanks for looking in and adding your always sage advice, Though I'm not quite sure what you're suggesting in this case?

Regards,
 
NIgel, Think that I understand. Here are the conunbroms however. I thought to add some 2mm framing around the kit provided windows.
But, that created problems that I did not foresee, as I will use the new kit provided bits that wrap around the galleries.
SO now removing these added frames fitting proportions become disabled -- and will also need to revisit the gold foil that has become damaged.
But now all will should "properly" fit together.
Also, these windows will be all but almost invisible after attaching the bits that cover almost all window details - Will also build four doors which
will further hide windows even more.

1.jpeg2.jpeg3.jpeg4.JPG
 
Hi all,
Very minor work in progress all thanks to Nigel; Yes, window openings (I plan to add "mika") will look much nicer larger framed for lower balcony/galleries – Thanks!!
Also, thanks to Nigel who sent me a very nice PM – I’m replacing all the previous out-of-scale gratings. I sort of new they were but ignored it lol

That said, I’ve looked through the reference books that I have, but can’t determine if there is a proper way to install gratings. Should the full-length looking timbers run longitudinally with the deck, or does it matter either way? Thanks for any advice.


1.jpeg2.jpeg3.jpeg4.jpeg
 
John

The "full length" battens run along the length of the ship, the ledges run perpendicular to the ship's centrelineThumbsup

The larger windows are a massive aesthetic improvement over stock IMHO
 
Morning,

Nigel as always - thanks again..

Just sort of “thinking to myself” here. Very tempted to add window "glass" to the outer gallery openings (both sides (upper and lower) as well as to the stern backside. That noted, just adding mica without any window frames would make each single window pane out of scale. So plans A-D in progress...

Plan “B” add house window screen material Hmmm?? Got a few samples from local hardware store.

Plan “C” – but glimpsing through the openings would reveal unfinished work on the inside – So now also attempting to fabricate an inner sleeve covering that will cover the cut mica and screens. Need to also think about small inner planking details?….

Plan “D” may just not add windows at all – will see how that first one I’m working on comes out. If I break the first very thin veneer – may give up on this bit…hahaha Here are a few images of my "thinking"

Cheers,


1.jpeg2.jpeg3.jpeg4.jpeg5.jpeg6.jpeg
 
My plan for these windows back in the day was to create a large glazing "sheet" to cut the windows from.Somewhere kicking about at home is an etched brass sheet of diamond mesh I planed to lay on a flat level surface covered with greaseproof paper.I then planned on covering the mesh in a thin layer of "clear as glass" casting epoxy.This will give crystal clear windows with a flat surface so you would not loose optical clarity through refraction.

The finished result was the mesh would be embedded in resin with a total thickness of around 1mm.As I stopped work on my build,I never got around to trying it but in theory it should work.I did plan on blackening the mesh first rather than painting it black as it is superfine and I would loose that with a layer of paint.

Just giving you another option;)
 
Nigel,
Your solution is certainly more accurate - allowing for the window panes to seem properly attached to their metal framings. Given that the
fiberglass window screen material (I plan on using) is so thin, as to be almost flat - I will try that first - I also purchased a bottler of Tamiya X-22 clear coat -
I will try to thinly brush some over the screen and mica mineral glass - maybe then the glass and frames will "appear" properly attached to the small window panes.

All to be determined - right now continuing work on the upper gallery deck framing, and planking (had to scratch build that frame as well)
Thanks for your interest as well as your always sage advice -

Regards,
 
Sort of back-to back postings. This is a fix that was so needed. All deck gratings were so out of scale. grrr...So replaced them.

Thanks to the so kind member that suggested that I fix this lol...that would be Nigel (NMBROOK) :)

1.jpeg2.jpeg4.jpeg5.jpeg

May leave this one as is - still thinking

6.jpeg



After spending north of $60 USD back and forth with Cornwall in the UK - had to settle for slight size variations. yikes.

I wanted to have them all of the size that is superimposed below (1.5)mm - but after several attempts to get the same 1.5 mm size gratings that would fit the existing openings from different vendors - turns out that 1.5mm from Amati and Caldercraft are actually not both the same 1.5mm that one would expect. had to give up, redundant orders and just settle for these 1mm bits that would cut to proper size for these four gratings. Oh well!!

7.jpeg9.jpeg


Nonetheless certainly an improvement - Nigel thanks for your advice lol

8.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top