The Arizona 1/200. Trumpeter.

David that is EXACTLY what I meant Thumbsup

If you Guys look at photo 042 that David has posted and compare that with the kit hull, you can immediately see what I touched on the article I stumbled across a few years ago now. Trumpeter have far too much meat in the bow and it should be more slender. Trumpeter were also guilty of this on Scharnhorst. Check out Nigel's modelling bench on Youtube for all the hull errors on that kit, there are LOTS
 
no problem. my ships folder is 76.8Gb & 53,050 files. it has plans, drawings & pictures of real ships & of model ships including my own.
Nigel, most model ship have that bow thickness problem. some people will leave that alone but i don't as i fix them to as real as possible.
 
on the strips, what you are proposing is to thick & wrong shape. look at that picture closely & remember your model is 1/200 scale.
i presume your rudder is glued in place, correct?
 
on the strips, what you are proposing is to thick & wrong shape. look at that picture closely & remember your model is 1/200 scale.
i presume your rudder is glued in place, correct?

O.K , yes you are probably correct about the thickness. I will trim them down. Rudder has been glued so I am good with how it is.

Did the model builder above add docking keels to his model ? I would like to see how he did that modification.
 
do you have strips or can make that is .010" thick & they are flat not round or semi-round?
the reason for about the rudder was glued or not was to round over the edges of the skeg which is the section of the hull from the keel(flat bottom part of hull) to the rudder.
i don't think he did the docking keels but not certain.
looking at the last drawing in this post, the docking keel at it's thinnest part(vertical) at 1/200 scale is .44mm.

body plans - 1.jpg

body plans - 2.jpg

bow deck chain plates.jpg

Sheet 17 - Midship Section.jpg
 
Last edited:
O.K , yes you are probably correct about the thickness. I will trim them down. Rudder has been glued so I am good with how it is.

Did the model builder above add docking keels to his model ? I would like to see how he did that modification.
Hi Brian,
I initially used 1.0mm strips to create the blister detail in this photo and straight away I wasn't happy with it.

I'll be redoing the blisters with a thinner strip. I have some 0.5 x 0.5 mm so will see how that looks first. David's reference to scale is spot on and something I need to keep revisiting when scratching up details. :)
Blister detail.jpeg
 
Just been modifying the propeller shaft housing to a more tapered profile. I have marked out and removed the bulge on the hull with my Dremel.

I still have more sandpapering and filler to get things looking right.



View attachment 516074View attachment 516075
Brian,
How did you modify the prop shaft exit points? Just sanding and putty and mucho sanding?
 
Steve & Bryian, do you both have or can acquire both scotch tape & masking tape to do an experiment. the experiment involves cutting narrow width strips of tape to simulate the strips on the real ship's blisters to see which tape appears to have the right thickness at the approximate scale sight distance. if still to thick then can use paint done in layers to get the approximate correct thickness.
Bryian, don't do anymore painting of the kit til you get all the corrections that you want to do.
 
Steve & Bryian, do you both have or can acquire both scotch tape & masking tape to do an experiment. the experiment involves cutting narrow width strips of tape to simulate the strips on the real ship's blisters to see which tape appears to have the right thickness at the approximate scale sight distance. if still to thick then can use paint done in layers to get the approximate correct thickness.
Bryian, don't do anymore painting of the kit til you get all the corrections that you want to do.
I have seen that method used by other modellers to replicate the strips, but I feel it was on smaller scale models (1/350 perhaps). Not sure it would work on 1/200 scale without quite a few paint layers were applied; however, I stand to be corrected.
 
Back
Top