- Joined
- Jan 9, 2020
- Messages
- 10,522
- Points
- 938

Happy Birthday @Kolderstok Hans!


I trust that it will be a wonderful day with your family and that the year ahead will be a healthy and successful one!






**VIEW THREAD HERE** |
Thank you so much Paul! It is sincerely appreciated - still battling with the front wall though!Heinrich, I am happy to see you accomplish what has been so long pursued! And it really does look marvelous!
Thank you very much for the very kind comments, Daniel - you know that I value it highly. The anchors are thoroughly discussed in Ab's books and on his plans so that should not be a problem. But to be honest - I have not yet studied that part.Fantastic picture of you and your wife on the water Heinrich. I love the look and location of the winch and the color of its cabling. Just curious, do you have a definitive reference of what the anchor looks like?
Thank you, cousin Heinrich!Happy Birthday @Kolderstok Hans!![]()
I trust that it will be a wonderful day with your family and that the year ahead will be a healthy and successful one!
View attachment 336071
Further to your question Daniel. Have a look at this!Fantastic picture of you and your wife on the water Heinrich. I love the look and location of the winch and the color of its cabling. Just curious, do you have a definitive reference of what the anchor looks like?
Thanks Heinrich,Further to your question Daniel. Have a look at this!
View attachment 336102
View attachment 336103
This gives you some idea of the remarkably detailed plans of @Ab Hoving. The WB had four anchors: a "plecht" (no idea of the English) anchor for use in bad weather, a daily anchor for normal conditions, a "tuin" (directly translated - garden) anchor and a werp (throw) anchor used on wind still days. What the "tuin" anchor was used for, I have no idea. On all of De Veer's drawings we see only one anchor on each side, which indicates that the others were probably stored below-deck to add to the ballast.
I can give you an answer on that too Daniel. It depends on whose formula you follow. If you followed Van Yk, then the WB would have had a cable with a circumference of 10 cm (approx 4-inches), according to Witsen, it was 8 cm (approx 3.1 inches).Thanks Heinrich,
Looks like basic anchor design doesn't change much over the ages of sail years. Since I happen to be working on the Vasa's anchor and am in discussions with @Frank48 about the cable sizes, I was curious about yours.
There is no mention of any protection, Jan.That begets an interesting question. How was the anchor raised. What protected the bulwarks while the anchor rope was winched in?
This is great information Mr. Hoving, the draw works required to grab set and stow the anchor now make complete sense for my Vasa.About anchors: plecht anchor = bow anchor. Tui anchor (not tuiN) is a second anchor after the daily one in case two are needed. (Tui = support).
When an anchor is hauled up and reaches the surface a block with a hook is immediately hooked in the ring and the anchor is raised until it hangs from the cat head, so that it can be stowed along the side. See John Harland- Seamanship in the age of sail.
Thank you very much for correcting my blunder, Ab.About anchors: plecht anchor = bow anchor. Tui anchor (not tuiN) is a second anchor after the daily one in case two are needed. (Tui = support).
When an anchor is hauled up and reaches the surface a block with a hook is immediately hooked in the ring and the anchor is raised until it hangs from the cat head, so that it can be stowed along the side. See John Harland- Seamanship in the age of sail.
Great Daniel. I am glad that Ab could give you the correct answer.This is great information Mr. Hoving, the draw works required to grab set and stow the anchor now make complete sense for my Vasa.
That looks better to me than the doorway.Open front wall
Thank you, Jan - much appreciated.That looks better to me than the doorway.
Open front wall.
Thank you very much my friend. Your input is highly valued. I am now just worried that everyone chooses the open canopy because of how terrible my front wall looks!the canopy without the frontwall seems a better idea to me Heinrich.
It looks a lot better![]()